skip to main content
article

Accommodating field-dependence: a cross-over study

Published:28 June 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In a previous study, it was found that field-independent learners performed significantly better than field-dependent learners in a web based and in a computerised text-based environment. It was decided to adapt both a web interface and a traditional text to accommodate the Field-dependent learner so as to try to reduce the disparity in performance with Field-independents. Seventy Information Systems students were initially assessed for Field-dependence/Field-independence cognitive style using the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT). The group of students was divided up randomly into two halves. In Session one, group 1 studied using a Web interface Modules 1 - 9 of an Introductory Course in Artificial Intelligence. Group 2 studied the same material in hard copy form only (Text). All studied the material for one hour per week for six weeks. They were then assessed in a one-hour exam. After a period of 7 weeks, in Session 2, Group 1 studied Modules 10 - 18 using Text while group two studied the same material using the Web interface. The results showed that the performance of Field-dependent individuals, be it in text or web, to be comparable to Field-independents.

References

  1. Adams, V.M., & McLeod, D.B. (1979) The interaction of field independence with discovery learning in mathematics. Journ of Experimental Education, 48, 32--35.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Altman, D (1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research Chapman & Hall.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Allport, G.W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York Holt and Co.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayersman, D.J., & Minden, A. (1995) Individual differences, computers, and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 11 (3/4), 371--390.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Data Desk V6 {Computer Software} 1980 -- 2001 Data Description Inc. PO Box 4555, Ithaca New York 14852.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ford, N. (1995) Levels and types of mediation in instructional systems: an individual differences approach International Journal of Human - Computer Studies 43, 241--259.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ford, N, Wood, F. & Walsh, C. (1994) Cognitive styles and online searching Online & CD-Rom Review 18 (2) 79--86.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ford. N. and Chen, S (2001) Individual differences, Hypermedia navigation and learning Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 2000, 9 (40, 282--311.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Grieve, T. D. and Davis, J. K. (1971) The relationship of cognitive style and method of instruction to performance in ninth grade geography Journal of Educational research 65, 137--141.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jonassen, D.M. & Grabowski, B.L. (1993) Handbook of individual differences: Learning and Instruction, Hillsdale, N.J. Laurence Erlbaum.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Joust (1999) The Outline Navigation System in Javascript www.ivanpeters.com.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Korthauer, R.D. & Koubek , R.J. (1994). An empirical evaluation of knowledge , cognitive style, and structure upon the performance of hypertext task. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6 (4), 373--390.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kim, K. S. (2001) Implications of user characteristics in information seeking on the World Wide Web International Journal of Human Computer Interaction 13, (3) 323--340.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lambert, T. (1981). Effects of structure in preinstructional strategies on memory for sentences in field dependent individuals (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California), Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 1063.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. McLeod, D.B., Carpenter, T.P., McCormack, R.L., & Romuladas, S.(1978). Cognitive style and mathematics learning: The interaction of field independence and instructional treatment in numeration systems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 163--174.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Parkinson, A & Redmond, James A., 'Do cognitive styles affect learning performance in different computer media?" Inroads - SIGCSE Bulletin Vol 34 No. 3 (pp 39-43) Sept 2002 ACM Press NewYork Association of Computing Machinery New York also in Proceedings of the 7th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education June 24-28, Aarhus, Denmark 2002 and in ACM Digital Library.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pask, G. and Scott, B. C. E, Learning strategies and individual confidence International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 4, 217--253.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Riding, R.J. & Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Jour. of Educ. Psych. 63, 297--307.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Witkin, M.A., Oltman, P., Raskin, E., Karp, S. (1971). A Manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Witkin, H. A., Price, W., Bertini, M. Christiansen, S., (1974) Social Conformity & Psychological Differentiation International Journal of Psychology 9.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Witkin, H. Cognitive style in academic performance and in teacher student relations in Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in Learning: Implications of Cognitive Styles and Creativity For Human Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yoon, G.S. (1994) The effect of instructional control, cognitive style and prior knowledge on learning of computer assisted instruction Journal of Educational technology Systems 22 (4) 357--370.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Accommodating field-dependence: a cross-over study

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
              ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 36, Issue 3
              September 2004
              280 pages
              ISSN:0097-8418
              DOI:10.1145/1026487
              Issue’s Table of Contents
              • cover image ACM Conferences
                ITiCSE '04: Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
                June 2004
                296 pages
                ISBN:1581138369
                DOI:10.1145/1007996

              Copyright © 2004 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 28 June 2004

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader