Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Blood-based colorectal cancer screening in an integrated health system: a randomised trial of patient adherence
  1. Gloria D Coronado1,2,
  2. Charisma L Jenkins1,
  3. Elizabeth Shuster1,
  4. Cheryl Johnson1,
  5. David Amy1,
  6. Jennifer Cook1,
  7. Samantha Sahnow1,
  8. Jamilyn M Zepp1,
  9. Rajasekhara Mummadi1
  1. 1 Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
  2. 2 The University of Arizona Cancer Center - North Campus, Tucson, Arizona, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gloria D Coronado, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, USA; gloria.d.coronado{at}kpchr.org

Abstract

Objective We evaluated whether people who had not completed a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening would complete a blood-based testing option if offered one during health encounters. Blood-based screening tests for CRC could add to the total number of people screened for CRC by providing another testing alternative.

Design Study participants were patients aged 45–75 years at a large, integrated health system who were offered but did not complete an FIT in the prior 3–9 months and were scheduled for a clinical encounter. Individuals were randomised (1:1) to be offered a commercially available CRC blood test (Shield, Guardant Health) versus usual care. We compared 3-month CRC screening proportions in the two groups.

Results We randomised 2026 patients; 2004 remained eligible following postrandomisation exclusions (1003 to usual care and 1001 to blood draw offer; mean age: 60, 62% female, 80% non-Hispanic white). Of the 1001 allocated to the blood test group, 924 were recruited following chart-review exclusions; 548 (59.3%) were reached via phone, of which 280 (51.1%) scheduled an appointment with the research team. CRC screening proportions were 17.5 percentage points higher in the blood test group versus usual care (30.5% vs 13.0%; OR 2.94, 95% CI 2.34 to 3.70; p<0.001).

Conclusion Among adults who had declined prior CRC screening, the offer of a blood-based screening test boosted CRC screening by 17.5 percentage points over usual care. Further research is needed on how to balance the favourable adherence with lower advanced adenoma detection compared with other available tests.

Trial registration number NCT05987709.

  • COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING
  • CLINICAL TRIALS
  • COLONOSCOPY

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it published Online First. Figure 1 has been corrected.

  • Contributors GDC conceptualised the study, drafted the manuscript, and serves as the guarantor; CLJ provided administrative support; ES conducted analysis; CJ, DA, JC, SS ad JMZ enrolled study participants, RM provided clinical oversight. All coauthors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

  • Funding This study was funded by Guardant Health Incorporated; the funders processed the blood test for the trial.

  • Competing interests GDC has served as a scientific advisor for Exact Sciences.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.