You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Correspondence response
Response to: ‘Is the PET/CT first choice for differential diagnosis of FUO/IUO?’ by Armagan et al
  1. Verena Schönau,
  2. Georg Schett
  1. Department of Internal Medicine 3, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitatsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Professor Georg Schett, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, University Clinic of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen 91054, Germany; georg.schett{at}uk-erlangen.de

https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212785

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We thank Dr Armagan and colleagues for their letter1 regarding our article entitled, ‘The value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in identifying the cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO): data from a prospective study’.2

    In their comment, Dr Armagan and colleagues ask whether a fixed cut-off level for the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) in the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

    • Contributors VS and GS wrote the letter.

    • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles