Communication Strategies in Computer-Mediated Communication

An Egyptian EFL Context

Authors

  • Hanaa Khamis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.35-48

Keywords:

Computer-mediated Communication (CMC), Synchronous CMC, Asynchronous CMC, Written Chat, Threaded Discussion, Communication Strategies, Task-based Interaction, Strategic Competence, English as a Foreign Language (EFL)

Abstract

This article reports the results of an exploratory study investigating the use of four communication strategies in synchronous written chat and asynchronous threaded discussion. Task-based interactions among 15 Egyptian university learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) were analyzed. The results showed that topic continuation was used in synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) at a significantly higher rate compared to the significantly low use of hypothesis testing. Several factors were identified as potential reasons for variation in communication strategy use. The data also indicated factors that closely related to low interactivity in asynchronous CMC. The findings of the study suggest that the nature of communication strategies, the nature of medium type, and/or intra-/interpersonal factors may (de-)activate communication strategy use. The study highlights the importance of studying learner interactions with a problem-free lens, focusing more on EFL learners' communicative successes than their linguistic and communicative deficiencies. The article concludes that further investigation is needed to study how interactivity relates to communication strategies, medium types, medium preferences, intra-/interpersonal factors, and task design.

References

Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake

Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.

Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4, 193-220. Retrieved from http://education.ex.ac.uk/download.php?id=103

Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81, 285-300.

Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260.

Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Introduction: Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rost, M., & Ross, S. (1991). Learner use of strategies in interaction: Typology and teachability. Language Learning, 41, 235-273.

Smith, B. (2003a). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.

Smith, B. (2003b). The use of communication strategies in computer-mediated communication. System, 31, 29-53.

Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/default.html

Tarone, E. (1983). Some thoughts on the notion of ‘communication strategy.’ In C. Færch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 61-74). London: Longman.

Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini

Vandergriff, I. (2006). Negotiating common ground in computer-mediated versus face-to-face discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 110-138. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num1/vandergriff

Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in interactive listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 494-505.

Yule, G., & Tarone, E. (1997). Investigating communication strategies in L2 reference: Pros and cons. In G. Kasper & E. Kellerman (Eds.), Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 17-30). London: Longman.

Zhao, Y. (1996). Language learning on the world wide web: Toward a framework of network based CALL. CALICO Journal, 14, 37-51. Retrieved from https://calico.org/page.php?id=5

Downloads

Published

2013-01-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Khamis, H. (2013). Communication Strategies in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Egyptian EFL Context. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.35-48

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>