Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T01:27:04.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Affronting of the Uniform Guidelines: From Propaganda to Discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Kyle E. Brink  and
Jeffrey L. Crenshaw
Kyle E. Brink*
Affiliation:
St. John Fisher College
Jeffrey L. Crenshaw
Affiliation:
Personnel Board of Jefferson County, Alabama
*
E-mail: kbrink@sjfc.edu, Address: St. John Fisher College, 3690 East Avenue, Rochester, NY 14618
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 547 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Jr., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435–442. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.435.Google Scholar
Biddle, D. A. (2008). Are the uniform guidelines outdated? Federal guidelines, professional standards, and validity generalization (VG). The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 45, 17–23. Google Scholar
Biddle, D. A. (2010). Should employers rely on local validation studies or validity generalization (VG) to support the use of employment tests in Title VII situations? Public Personnel Management, 39, 307–326. Google Scholar
Brannick, M. T., Levine, E. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Job and work analysis: Methods, research, and applications for human resource management (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). Staffing twenty-first-century organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 133–165. doi:10.1080/19416520802211461.Google Scholar
Dierdorff, E. C., Rubin, R. S., & Morgeson, F. P. (2009). The milieu of managerial work: An integrative framework linking work context to role requirements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 972–988. doi:10.1037/a0015456.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2008). Commission meeting of March 17, 2008 on renewal of UGESP authorization under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/archive/3-17-08/transcript.html.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2011). Review of existing regulations. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/regulations/index.cfm.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, & Department of Justice. (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 43, 38290–39315. Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Office of Personnel Management, Department of Justice, Department of Labor, & Department of Treasury. (1979). Adoption of questions and answers to clarify and provide a common interpretation of the uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 44, 11996. Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Office of Personnel Management, Department of Justice, Department of Labor, & Department of Treasury. (1980). Adoption of additional questions and answers to clarify and provide a common interpretation of the uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Federal Register, 45, 29530. Google Scholar
Gatewood, R. D., Feild, H. S., & Barrick, M. (2008). Human resource selection (6th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western. Google Scholar
Gibson, W. M., & Caplinger, J. A. (2007). Transportation of validation results. In McPhail, S. M. (Ed.), Alternative validation strategies: Developing new and leveraging existing validity evidence (pp. 29–81). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar
Griggs v. Duke Power Company. (1971). 401 U.S. 424.Google Scholar
Heneman, H. G. III, Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). Staffing organizations (7th ed.). Middleton, WI: Mendota House. Google Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Kepes, S., & Banks, G. C. (2011). The Uniform Guidelines are a detriment to the field of personnel selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 494–514.Google Scholar
McKay, P. F., & McDaniel, M. A. (2006). A reexamination of black-white mean differences in work performance: More data, more moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 538–554. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.538.Google Scholar
McPhail, S. M. (2007). Development of validation evidence. In McPhail, S. M. (Ed.), Alternative validation strategies: Developing new and leveraging existing validity evidence (pp. 1–25). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar
Newman, D. A., Hanges, P. J., & Outtz, J. L. (2007). Racial groups and test fairness, considering history and contruct validity. American Psychologist, 62, 1082–1083. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.1082.Google Scholar
Outtz, J. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). A theory of adverse impact. In Outtz, J. L. (Ed.), Adverse impact: Implications for organizational staffing and high stakes selection (pp. 53–94). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
Pearlman, K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 373–406. Google Scholar
Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2012). Strategic staffing (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Google Scholar
Ployhart, R. E., & Holtz, B. C. (2008). The diversity-validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racioethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Personnel Psychology, 61, 153–172. Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529–540. Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274. Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP). (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author. Google Scholar
Stelly, D. J., & Goldstein, H. W. (2007). Application of content validation methods to broader constructs. In McPhail, S. M. (Ed.), Alternative validation strategies: Developing new and leveraging existing validity evidence (pp. 252–316). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar