1. Charles Dickens, Bleak House 603-4 (Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin Books, 1971; original publication 1853).Google Scholar

2. Lenard R. Berlanstein, The Barristers of Toulouse in the Eighteenth Century, 1740-1793, at 12-13 (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

3. Kagan, Richard L., Law Students and Legal Careers in France, 68 Past & Present 38 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Louis-François de Jouy. Arrests de Reglrnent 26-28 (Paris: Durand & Pissot, 1752).Google Scholar

5. Berlanstein at 6–8.Google Scholar

6. Id. at 101–7.Google Scholar

7. Myriam Yardeni, L'Ordre des Avocats et la grève du barreau parisien en 1602, Rev. d'Hist. econ. & SOC. 481–507 (1966).Google Scholar

8. Alexis de Tocqueville, The Old Regime and the French Revolution 39-53, trans. Stuart Gilbert (New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1955).Google Scholar

9. l Roland Mousinier, The Institutions of France Under the Absolute Monarchy 1598–1789, ar 430-48, trans. Brian Pearce (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).Google Scholar

10. Edmond Seligman, La Justice en France pendant la Revolution, vol. 1: 1789–1792 (Paris, 1901).Google Scholar

11. 5 M. D. Dalloz, Repertoire de legislation, de doctrine et de jurisprudence 467–68 (Paris: Bureau de la Jurisprudence Generale du Royaume, 1847).Google Scholar

12. Archibald Young, Historical Studies of the French Bar 131–41 (Edinburgh: Edmonston & Douglas, 1869).Google Scholar

13. 5 Dalloz at 537–82.Google Scholar

14. 1 M. M. Dalloz, Supplement au Repertoire dc legislation, de doctrine et de jurisprudence 705 (Paris: Bureau de la Jurisprudence Generale du Royaume, 1887).Google Scholar

15. Sirey, Jurisprudence en XIX siècle, Table decennale 57, editor's trans. (Paris: Bureau de I'Administration, 1872).Google Scholar

16. Robert Jones, A History of the French Bar Ancient and Modern 131 (London: Benning, 1855).Google Scholar

17. Edmond Rousse, Lettres à un ami, vol. 1: 1845-1870; vol. 2: 1870-1880 (Paris: Librairie Hachette, 1909).Google Scholar

18. Emile Artaud, Le Barreau français au XIXième siècle (Marseille: Barlatier & Barthelet, 1889).Google Scholar

19. Marie-Oscar Pinard, Le Barreau au XIXième siècle (Paris: Paguerre, 1864).Google Scholar

20. George Laronze, Histoire de la commune de 1871 d'apres des documents et des souvenirs inedits, La Justice (Paris: Payot, 1928).Google Scholar

21. Jacques Dubosc, Evolution comparée des professions d'avocat de d'avoué (Paris: Montargis, 1960).Google Scholar

22. Association Nationale des Avocats, Report 73-79 (Paris: The Association, 1967).Google Scholar

23. Id. at 88-89.Google Scholar

24. Association de la Presse Judiciare, The Paris Law Courts: Sketches of Men and Manners 276, trans. Gerald P. Moriarty (London: Seeley, 1894).Google Scholar

25. W. Raymond Blackard. Requirements for Admission to the Bar in Revolutionary America, 15 Tenn. L. Rev. 116 (1940); Anton Herman Chroust, The Rise of the Legal Profession, vol. 1: The Colonial Experience (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1965) (“1 Chroust”).Google Scholar

26. Paul Hamlin, Legal Education in Colonial New York 128 (New York: Da Capo, 1970).Google Scholar

27. 1 Chroust (cited in note 25).Google Scholar

28. Stephen Botein, The Legal Profession in Colonial North America, in Wilfred R. Prest, ed., Lawyers in Early Modern Europe and America (London: Croom Helm, 1983).Google Scholar

29. Walter Mcllreath, A Treatise on the Constitution of Georgia (Atlanta, Ga.: Harrison, 1912); Kenneth Coleman, The American Revolution in Georgia, 1763-1789 (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1958).Google Scholar

30. Robert L. Brunhouse, The Counter Revolution in Pennsylvania, 1776-1790, at 14-38 (New York: Octagon, 1971).Google Scholar

31. Gerard W. Gawalt, The Promise of Power: The Emergence of the Legal Profession in Massachusetts 1760-1840, at 61-69 (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1979) (“Gawalt, Promise of Power”).Google Scholar

32. Anton Herman Chroust, The Rise of the Legal Profession, vol. 2: The Revolution and the Post-Revolutionary Era 243-44 (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1965) (“2 Chroust”).Google Scholar

33. Richard E. Ellis, The Jeffersonian Crisis: Courts and Politics in the Young Republic (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

34. W. Raymond Blackard, Requirements for Admission to the Bar in Revolutionary America, 15 Tenn. L. Rev. 116 (1940); id., The Demoralization of the Legal Profession in Nineteenth Century America, 16 Tenn. L. Rev. 314 (1940).Google Scholar

35. Augustin Smith Clayton, ed., A Compilation of the Law of the State of Georgia, 1800-1810, at 331-32 (Augusta, Ga.: Adams & Duyckinck, 1813).Google Scholar

36. 2 Chroust at 267-70.Google Scholar

37. Alfred 2. Reed, Training for the Public Profession of the Law 86 (Bull. No. 15) (New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1921) (“Reed, Training”); 2 Chroust at 158-65.Google Scholar

38. William G. Bishop & William H. Attree, Debate and Proceedings in the New York State Convention for the Revision of the Constitution 72-73, 575-77, 647, 827 (Albany, N.Y.: Evening Atlas, 1846).Google Scholar

39. Gary Nash, The Philadelphia Bench and Bar 1800-1860, 7 Comp. Stud. in Soc'y & Hist. 203 (1965).Google Scholar

40. Reed, Training at 86-87.Google Scholar

41. John C. Bullitt, Some Recollections of the Bar of Fifty Years Ago, in Law Association of Philadelphia, Addresses Delivered March 13, 1902 and Papers Prepared or Republished to Commemorate the Centennial Celebration of the Law Association of Philadelphia 1802-1902 (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Bar Association, 1954; originally published 1902).Google Scholar

42. G. W. Pepper, Legal Education and Admission to the Bar (Philadelphia: Philadelphia Bar Association, 1895); Lawrence M. Friedman, A History of American Law 151-52 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1973).Google Scholar

43. Gawalt, Promise of Power 11, 109 (cited in note 31).Google Scholar

44. Reed, Training at 89-90.Google Scholar

45. Roscoe Pound, The Lawyer from Antiquity to Modern Times (St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co., 1953) (“Pound”).Google Scholar

46. Blackard, 16 Tenn. L. Rev. 314 (cited in note 34).Google Scholar

47. John P. Frank, Lincoln as a Lawyer 168-71 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1961).Google Scholar

48. Gawalt, Promise of Power 172-73 (cited in note 31).Google Scholar

49. Nash, 7 Comp. Stud. in Soc'y & Hist. 203 (cited in note 39).Google Scholar

50. Pound at 253-69.Google Scholar

51. Glenn R. Winters, Bar Association Organization and Activities (Ann Arbor, Mich.: American Judicature Society, 1954).Google Scholar

52. Lon L. Fuller, Legal Education and Admission to the Bar in Philadelphia, 25 Temple L.Q. 249 (1925).Google Scholar

53. Reed, Training (cited in note 37); Alfred Z. Reed, Present Day Law Schools in the United States and Canada (Bull. No. 21) (New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1928) (“Reed, Present Day Law Schools”).Google Scholar

54. J. Richard Woodworth, Some Influences on the Reform of Schools of Law and Medicine 1890 to 1930, 14 Soc. Q. 496 (1973).Google Scholar

55. Kevin Tierney, Darrow 165–66 (New York: Crowell, 1979).Google Scholar

56. Dayton David McKean, The Integrated Bar (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1963).Google Scholar

57. Theodore J. Schneyer, The Incoherence of the Unified Bar Concept: Generalizing from the Wisconsin Case, 1983 A.B.F. Res. J. 1, 6.Google Scholar

58. Martin Garbus & Joel Seligman, Sanctions and Disbarment: They Sit in Judgment, in Mark Green & Ralph Nader, eds., Verdicts on Lawyers 47-60 (New York: Crowell, 1976); Michael J. Powell, Professional Divestiture: The Cession of Responsibility for Lawyers' Discipline, 1986 A.B.F. Res. J. 31.Google Scholar

59. Jerome E. Carlin, Lawyers on Their Own: A Study of Individual Practitioners in Chicago (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1962) (“Carlin”).Google Scholar

60. Id. at 177-80.Google Scholar

61. John P. Heinz & Edward O. Laumann, Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar 374-76 (Chicago: American Bar Foundation; New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1982).Google Scholar

62. Godfrey Elton, The Revolutionary Idea in France 1789-1871 (London: Arnold, 1923).Google Scholar

63. Wilfrid R. Prest, The Inns of Court Under Elizabeth I and the Early Stuarts 1590-1640, at 52 (London: Longman, 1972) (“Prest, Inns of Court”).Google Scholar

64. Hugh H.L. Bellott, The Exclusion of Attorneys from the Inns of Court, 26 L.Q. Rev. 137 (1910).Google Scholar

65. Prest, Inns of Court at 196-219.Google Scholar

66. Id.; John Dykstra Eusden, Puritans, Lawyers and Politics in Early Seventeenth Century England (Yale Studies in Religious Education, vol. 23) (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1958).Google Scholar

67. 6 Sir William Holdsworth, A History of English Law (London: Methuen, 1924) (“Holdsworth, History”).Google Scholar

68. F. A. Inderwick, The Interregnum AD 1648-1660 Studies of the Commonwealth: Legislative, Social and Legal 155 (London: Sampson Low, 1891) (“Inderwick, Interregnum”).Google Scholar

69. S. E. Prall, The Agitation for Law Reform During the Puritan Revolution (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966).Google Scholar

70. Donald Veall, The Popular Movement for Law Reform 1640-1660 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970).Google Scholar

71. Id. at 77.Google Scholar

72. Id. at 209.Google Scholar

73. Mary Cotterell, Interregnum Law Reform: The Hale Commission of 1652, 83 Eng. Hist. Rev. 689 (1968).Google Scholar

74. Holdsworth, History at 142-63; Inderwick, Interregnum at 201-48; F. A. Inderwick, The King's Peace 206-12 (London: Allen & Unwin, 1895).Google Scholar

75. Sir Charles Firth, Oliver Cromwell and the Rule of the Puritans in England 341 (London: Oxford University Press, 1900).Google Scholar

76. Francis Cowper, A Prospect of Gray's Inn 61-68 (London: Stevens, 1951).Google Scholar

77. Reginald Fletcher, ed., Pension Book of Gray's Inn (London: Gray's Inn, 1901); Charles Henry Hopwood, ed., Middle Temple Records, Minutes of Parliament (London: Middle Temple, 1904); Inderwick, The King's Peace (cited in note 74); J. Douglas Walker, Records of the Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn, The Black Books (London: Lincoln's Inn, 1897).Google Scholar

78. 1 Sir George Clark, A History of the Royal College of Physicians of London 353-61 (London: Clarendon Press, 1964); Cecil Wall, H. Charles Cameron, & E. Ashworth Underwood, A History of the Worshipful Society of Apothecaries of London, vol. 1: 1617-1815, at 100-106 (London: Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

79. Raymond Williams, Culture and Society 1780-1950 (Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin, 1961); R.H. Tawney, The Acquisitive Society (London: Collins, 1961); Harold Macmillan, The Middle Way (London: Macmillan, 1938).Google Scholar

80. Paul Lucas, A Collective Biography of Students and Barristers of Lincoln's Inn 1680-1804: A Study in the ‘Aristocratic Resurgence’ of the Eighteenth Century, 46 J. Mod. Hist. 227 (1974); Daniel Duman, The English and Colonial Bars in the Nineteenth Century 28 (London: Croom Helm, 1983).Google Scholar

81. Brian Abel-Smith & Robert Stevens, Lawyers and the Courts: A Sociological Study of the English Legal System 1750-1965, at 68-70, 165-80 (London: Heinemann, 1967).Google Scholar

82. Royal Commission on Legal Services, Final Report (Cmnd. 7648) (London: HMSO, 1979) (“Royal Commission”).Google Scholar

83. Abel-Smith & Stevens at 32-35, 55-57, 142-46.Google Scholar

84. Id. at 215-20.Google Scholar

85. Lord Rawlinson of Ewell, chairman, Report of the Committee on the Constitution of the Senate (London: Gray's Inn, 1986).Google Scholar

86. Abel-Smith & Stevens at 226-36.Google Scholar

87. Id. at 177-82, 352-54.Google Scholar

88. 1 Royal Commission 613-18.Google Scholar

89. M. Miles, “Eminent Practitioners”: The New Visage of Country Attorneys, in G. R. Rubin & David Sugarman, eds., Law, Economy and Society: Essays in the History of English Law 1750-1914 (Abingdon, Eng.: Professional Books, 1984) (Miles, “Eminent Practitioners”).Google Scholar

90. Abel-Smith & Stevens at 380-91, 466-72.Google Scholar

91. Lawyers and the Courts: Time for Some Changes, Law Soc'y's Gaz. (Supp.), 22 Jan. 1986 (Discussion Paper issued by the Law Society's Contentious Business Committee) (London: Council of the Law Society, 1986).Google Scholar

92. France, I assume, is its closest rival. Andre Toulemon, Barreaux de Paris et Barreaux de Province (Paris: Librairies Techniques, 1966), estimated that 50% of French advocates were members of the Paris order in 1964, but 75% of all barristers and 33% of all solicitors practice in London in 1979.Google Scholar

93. See original manuscript page 103-note “36.”Google Scholar

94. Lord Chancellor's Department, Legal Aid in England and Wales: A New Framework (London: HMSO, 1987).Google Scholar

95. Quintin Johnstone & Dan Hopson, Jr., Lawyers and Their Work: An Analysis of the Legal Profession in the United States and England 475 (Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1967).Google Scholar

96. Hilton, W. Graham & Lerner, Shirley W., Apprenticeship to Affluence, 62 Law Soc'y's Gaz. 98 (1965).Google Scholar

97. Frances Kahn Zemans & Victor G. Rosenblum, The Making of a Public Profession 34 (Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1981).Google Scholar

98. Miles, “Eminent Practitioners” (cited in note 89).Google Scholar

99. Robert Robson, The Attorney in Eighteenth Century England (London: Cambridge University Press, 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

100. Sanctuary, Gerald, The Solicitor's Public Image, 70 Law Soc'y's Gas. 1458 (1973).Google Scholar

101. The Times (London), May 4, 1984.Google Scholar

102. Id May 30, 1985.Google Scholar

103. 1 Royal Commission 196-202 (cited in note 82).Google Scholar

104. Maxwell Bloomfield, American Lawyers in a Changing Society, 1776-1876 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

105. Gawalt, Promise of Power 187 (cited in note 31).Google Scholar

106. Abel-Smith & Stevens at 459-68.Google Scholar

107. Albert Beebe White, Self-Government at the King's Command: A Study in the Beginnings of English Democracy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1933).Google Scholar

108. John Philip Dawson, A History of Law Judges (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960); id., The Oracles of the Law (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1968).Google Scholar

109. Damaska's work tends to support this argument. However, he is more concerned to show how two types of state affect the status of legal counsel (among other things) rather than to explain or compare professional development in specific countries. Mirjan R. Damaska, The Faces of Justice and State Authority 140-45, 173-77 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

110. Dawson nowhere discussed the legal reforms of the English revolution in detail, but he observed that “it is difficult to imagine what this strong control from the center might have done to the justices if the contest between King and Parliament had had a different outcome in the wars of the seventeenth century and the King's men had prevailed.” Dawson, A History of Law Judges at 140. His estimate of the significance of the French revolution is implicit in the opening remarks of his 1968 lectures: “modern French theories of the role of judges are not a reflection of Roman law, but a reaction against the excessive power and pretensions of the French judiciary under the old regime.” Dawson, The Oracles of the Law at 270.Google Scholar