To read this content please select one of the options below:

COSTS AND BENEFITS OF CASH FLOW ACCOUNTING: IMPLICATIONS FOR MALAYSIA

Neil Garrod (University of Glasgow Scotland)
Fatimah Shahman (Mara Institute of Technology Indonesia)

Asian Review of Accounting

ISSN: 1321-7348

Article publication date: 1 January 1996

500

Abstract

An issue which has received recent attention internationally is that of cash flow statements. In Malaysia members of the accounting bodies have been invited to present their comments and views on the possibility of adopting cash flow statements in Malaysia. Historical links with the United Kingdom mean that extant UK accounting standards usually find their equivalents in Malaysia sooner rather than later. The UK standard on cash flows requires a categorisation of cash flows which is different to the IASC and every other regulatory body except that in Hong Kong. On the other hand, Singapore, which has historically mirrored extant UK regulations quite closely, has decided to adopt the IASC model for cash flows. Thus the debate about whether, and how, to move from funds flow to cash flow reporting in Malaysia is tinged with an additional degree of complexity. By setting out a brief history of the transition from funds flow to cash flow reporting in the rest of the world and providing evidence from observations on the UK standard by preparers of accounts, it is hoped to contribute to the current debate in Malaysia.

Citation

Garrod, N. and Shahman, F. (1996), "COSTS AND BENEFITS OF CASH FLOW ACCOUNTING: IMPLICATIONS FOR MALAYSIA", Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 118-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060669

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1996, MCB UP Limited

Related articles