To read this content please select one of the options below:

Paternalistic leadership, efficacy beliefs and followers' performance: testing a multilevel model

Simon C.H. Chan (Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

Leadership & Organization Development Journal

ISSN: 0143-7739

Article publication date: 19 January 2024

Issue publication date: 29 April 2024

96

Abstract

Purpose

Using a multilevel model, this study examined how paternalistic leadership behaviors, including authoritarianism, morality and benevolence, influence followers' performance.

Design/methodology/approach

A sample of 556 leader–follower dyads from 66 groups in a manufacturing firm in China was collected for analysis. Descriptive statistics and multi-level regression analyses were used to analyze the data.

Findings

The results indicated that group efficacy mediates the relationship between authoritarian leadership and followers' performance and that self-efficacy mediates the relationship between benevolent leadership and followers' performance. In addition, the positive relationship between self-efficacy and followers' performance is weaker when followers exhibit higher levels of group efficacy.

Research limitations/implications

The data were collected in a manufacturing firm in China, it is difficult to generalize the results to other settings.

Practical implications

Managers should use their abilities and skills to interpret which paternalistic leadership styles their followers prefer, so as to improve their performance.

Originality/value

This study developed a multilevel model to examine the mediating processes of group efficacy and self-efficacy in the effect of PL behaviors, including authoritarianism, benevolence and morality, on followers' performance.

Keywords

Citation

Chan, S.C.H. (2024), "Paternalistic leadership, efficacy beliefs and followers' performance: testing a multilevel model", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 442-460. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2022-0175

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles