To read this content please select one of the options below:

Combining practice and theory to assess strategic thinking

Ellen F. Goldman (Department of Human and Organizational Learning, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA)
Karen S. Schlumpf (Department of Human and Organizational Learning, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA)
Andrea Richards Scott (Department of Human and Organizational Learning, Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA)

Journal of Strategy and Management

ISSN: 1755-425X

Article publication date: 20 November 2017

1165

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to describe the process used to develop and test the Individual Behavioral Assessment Tool for Strategic Thinking.

Design/methodology/approach

The instrument was developed using literature that identifies practices in use in organizations to assess strategic thinking competency and recommendations of scholars and practitioners to define strategic thinking and suggest how it could be assessed. Processes defined in the literature to develop competency measurements, both generally and for leadership and strategic management concepts specifically, were applied. A Delphi panel of experts reviewed the initial draft of the instrument which, with their refinements, was administered to participants in an executive leadership program.

Findings

Cronbach’s α and principal component analysis indicated that the instrument is internally consistent and unidimensional. Rasch analysis suggested a possible reduction in items that maintains good overall instrument performance.

Research limitations/implications

The study provides methodology for developing a measurement tool that fuses practice and theory. Further applications of the instrument across organizational levels and in single sectors would enhance its generalizability.

Practical implications

The instrument provides a consistent tool for use by practitioners to identify gaps in their own or another’s strategic thinking behaviors, specify a job-specific competency model, and direct professional development.

Originality/value

The instrument fills a gap in the theoretical literature by extending the descriptions of strategic thinking to include a comprehensive set of required individual behaviors. As such, it is the first theoretically based instrument to detail the specific competencies required to think strategically.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge and thank Dr Trudy Mallinson, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Research and Leadership; Senior Scientist, Center for Healthcare Innovation and Policy Research (CHIPR), and Director, Advanced Metrics Lab at the George Washington University, Washington, DC for her assistance with the statistical analyses conducted on the data. External funding: none received.

Citation

Goldman, E.F., Schlumpf, K.S. and Scott, A.R. (2017), "Combining practice and theory to assess strategic thinking", Journal of Strategy and Management, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 488-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-02-2017-0012

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles