To read this content please select one of the options below:

Why do process improvement projects fail in organizations? A review and future research agenda

Mariam Bader (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Jiju Antony (Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)
Raja Jayaraman (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Vikas Swarnakar (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Ravindra S. Goonetilleke (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Maher Maalouf (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates)
Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes (Centre for Supply Chain Improvement, The University of Derby, Derby, UK)
Kevin Linderman (Smeal College of Business, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA)

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma

ISSN: 2040-4166

Article publication date: 23 October 2023

Issue publication date: 8 April 2024

491

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine the critical failure factors (CFFs) linked to various types of process improvement (PI) projects such as Kaizen, Lean, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma and Agile. Proposing a mitigation framework accordingly is also an aim of this study.

Design/methodology/approach

This research undertakes a systematic literature review of 49 papers that were relevant to the scope of the study and that were published in four prominent databases, including Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science and EBSCO.

Findings

Further analysis identifies 39 factors that contribute to the failure of PI projects. Among these factors, significant emphasis is placed on issues such as “resistance to cultural change,” “insufficient support from top management,” “inadequate training and education,” “poor communication” and “lack of resources,” as primary causes of PI project failures. To address and overcome the PI project failures, the authors propose a framework for failure mitigation based on change management models. The authors present future research directions that aim to enhance both the theoretical understanding and practical aspects of PI project failures.

Practical implications

Through this study, researchers and project managers can benefit from well-structured guidelines and invaluable insights that will help them identify and address potential failures, leading to successful implementation and sustainable improvements within organizations.

Originality/value

To the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first study of its kind to examine the CFFs of five PI methodologies and introduces a novel approach derived from change management theory as a solution to minimize the risk associated with PI failure.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest to this research or its publications.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies. During the preparation and review of this work, the author(s) used ChatGPT to improve readability and language. After using this tool, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and took full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Citation

Bader, M., Antony, J., Jayaraman, R., Swarnakar, V., Goonetilleke, R.S., Maalouf, M., Garza-Reyes, J.A. and Linderman, K. (2024), "Why do process improvement projects fail in organizations? A review and future research agenda", International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 664-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-07-2023-0126

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles