To read this content please select one of the options below:

Why common job demands are challenging for individuals with mental illness: the interaction of personal vulnerability factors and ableist norms

Sophie Hennekam (Audencia Business School, Nantes, France)
Irena Descubes (Marketing Department, Rennes School of Business, Rennes, France)

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

ISSN: 2040-7149

Article publication date: 14 July 2023

Issue publication date: 15 January 2024

295

Abstract

Purpose

Drawing on the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, this study aims to examine which job demands individuals with diagnosed mental illness perceive to be most challenging as they navigate the workplace, why this is the case and which resources individuals tend to mobilize to meet these demands.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors draw on 257 qualitative surveys filled out by individuals with mental illness in various parts of the world.

Findings

The findings show that job demands that are common in today's workplace such as a high workload and a stressful environment are considered challenging by individuals with mental illness. Further, the authors show that this is the result of the ideal worker norm consisting of the need to be a steady performer that is confident, resilient and social with which the performer cannot comply on the one hand and the particularities of this population, such as performers' self-perceived low self-esteem, sensitivity to stress, fluctuating symptoms and difficulties with the social aspects of organizational life on the other hand.

Originality/value

The study points to the unique challenges of individuals with mental illness in the workplace and highlights the role human resource management (HRM) can play in providing support to allow this population to meet the demands of one's job more easily and thrive at work.

Keywords

Citation

Hennekam, S. and Descubes, I. (2024), "Why common job demands are challenging for individuals with mental illness: the interaction of personal vulnerability factors and ableist norms", Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 72-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-12-2022-0341

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles