1. Introduction

X-ray micro-computed tomography (µCT) is a powerful imaging technique for the three-dimensional (3D) characterization of samples using laboratory X-ray sources or synchrotron radiation facilities. It allows the direct, non-invasive observation and non-destructive analysis of a wide range of samples, yielding direct insights into their microstructure. The technique also allows investigation of processes through in situ/operando testing, where X-ray translucent experimental sample environments benefit from the high photon flux and energies available at X-ray sources to enable time-resolved tomography (4DµCT).

4DµCT studies enable a full visualization of transient processes at the grain scale in a controlled environment, complementing ex situ experiments and significantly advancing the capabilities of experimental geosciences. Due to their complexity, 4DµCT experiments are often significantly more challenging than conventional laboratory-based experiments, and the resulting 4D image data more complex to process. They are also more likely to be limited by time duration constraints (for example, a limited number of synchrotron shifts).

Confining the sample in a pressure vessel allows for the characterization and testing of material properties at conditions similar to those in the Earth's crust. Applications in the geosciences are numerous, where elevated conditions of pressure and temperature are reached in the uppermost kilometres of the Earth and interact with a wide range of anthropogenic interfaces with the geosphere. `Traditional' experimental devices are made to be stiff, and temperature- and pressure-resistant. They use high-strength materials, such as hardened steels and heavy metal carbides that render them opaque to the X-ray beams from modern sources, thus precluding direct imaging observations, even with advanced techniques such as synchrotron X-ray or neutron µCT. Grain-scale developments that influence the bulk behaviour of a sample can therefore only be assessed in post mortem studies. X-ray translucent operando environments, such as the one presented here, overcome these limitations. The recent upgrades toward the third and fourth generation of synchrotron light sources, as well as improvements in detector capacities (Mokso et al., 2017), have significantly enhanced the quality and spatial–temporal resolution of X-ray images (Buurlage et al., 2019; Guignot et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2016). Synchrotron sources are particularly suited for in situ/operando experiments because their (nearly) parallel beam geometry allows greater freedom in experiment design, with large source–sample–detector distances (cone beam laboratory-based CT scanners often require small source–sample distances). The partially coherent beam can also provide propagation-based phase contrast as a mechanism to enhance contrast sensitivity (edge enhancement) and yield higher imaging quality in given circumstances. A sufficiently high X-ray flux at higher energies has opened up the possibility of using thicker-walled pressure vessels and/or higher-atomic-number materials while achieving spatial resolutions down to a few micrometres voxel edge length (Gualda et al., 2010; Cnudde & Boone, 2013). Moreover, these improvements have also introduced the ability to explore the temporal dimension because the resolution of 4DµCT now available at synchrotron light sources (seconds to minutes) is compatible with the duration of many grain-scale transformations of geological materials (Marone et al., 2020).

These recent advances in imaging capabilities have led to the development of new instrumentation for the direct and time-resolved observations of dynamic geological processes (e.g. Noiriel & Renard, 2022). The primary challenge for characterizing such processes in 4D lies in the capacity limitations of bespoke testing devices in relation to their operating pressure and temperature ranges as well as their size. The design of these tools usually represents a compromise between X-ray transparency (translating into spatial and temporal resolution) and the properties of the materials used to make the pressure vessel (which determines the maximum operating pressures and temperatures). The need for X-ray transparency at high mechanical loads has been achieved through the development of miniature rock deformation apparatus which work on smaller samples than conventional laboratory apparatus. These smaller samples allow the application of reduced forces to reach high pressures, which can be accommodated by the X-ray translucent materials of the cell. Recent contributions have provided a large set of triaxial testing devices for operando laboratory or synchrotron X-ray µCT experiments (Viggiani et al., 2004; Lenoir et al., 2007; Tisato et al., 2014; Renard et al., 2016; Glatz et al., 2018; Voltolini et al., 2019; Butler et al., 2020; Cartwright-Taylor et al., 2022; Noiriel & Renard, 2022).

While the development of X-ray translucent rock physics apparatus is still ongoing, the current capabilities of operando apparatus remain largely below their off-line, laboratory-based equivalents, especially in terms of pressures and temperature. Offline devices have gradually incorporated indirect in situ testing modules to examine specific variables such as acoustic emissions, electrical conductivities (e.g. Lockner et al., 1991; Brantut et al., 2011) and fluid permeability (e.g. Leclère et al., 2016), alongside advanced mechanical tests (e.g. Rutter et al., 2009; Llana-Fúnez et al., 2012). Although these developments can be integrated in novel X-ray translucent in situ imaging apparatus (Cartwright-Taylor et al., 2022), their lighter designs and generally smaller dimensions often limit their capabilities in multimodal experiments. Efforts have been made towards more versatile designs (e.g. Fusseis et al, 2014; Butler et al., 2020), but most apparatus remain specific to particular research questions. For instance, many X-ray translucent mechanical testing devices lack temperature control (Viggiani et al., 2004; Lenoir et al., 2007; Tisato et al., 2014; Cartwright-Taylor et al., 2022) or offer only a limited temperature range (Butler et al., 2020; Renard et al., 2016). Moreover, many newly developed rigs lack comprehensive documentation such as blueprints, calibrations (pressure/load, machine stiffness, thermal gradients) and modification guidelines, hindering widespread adoption in the user community. Consequently, 4DµCT studies on crustal processes remain scarce and limited to specialist research groups.

This paper details the design, construction and operation of the Heitt Mjölnir rig. The device is a versatile apparatus that combines the capacities of a triaxial rig and a thermal reactor that enables operando 4DµCT characterization.

Heitt Mjölnir is a device named after the Norse god Thor's hammer, and `Heitt', the Icelandic word for `hot'. It draws inspiration from the design principles of the Mjölnir rig (Butler et al., 2020) while extending its capabilities and upholding the core ideas of modularity, portability and replicability for the imaging beamline user community. Migration of the heating system from an external to an internal location is the core of Heitt Mjölnir's development. The geometry of the surrounding parts optimizes heating efficiency and ensures uniform sample heat distribution. This rig represents a significant advancement by combining the best temperature performance of the existing heated X-ray translucent triaxial rigs (Renard et al., 2016; Voltolini et al., 2019; Glatz et al., 2018) with the high-pressure capacities of the non-heated versions. Heitt Mjölnir was designed to use large cylindrical samples (10 mm diameter and 20 mm length). It operates at temperatures of up to 573 K, while maintaining maximum pressure capacities of 30 MPa confining and pore fluid pressures and a differential stress of 500 MPa. This device has been designed to be X-ray translucent to synchrotron beams at intermediate energies (filtered white/monochromatic beams with peak energy above 50 keV) available at current third-generation synchrotron radiation facilities. With the capability to obtain high-quality tomography volumes in just a few minutes, Heitt Mjölnir operates at an imaging frequency compatible with many grain-scale processes in geomaterials.

This paper aims to provide readers with all the elements to understand, replicate and use Heitt Mjölnir. It offers a comprehensive step-by-step guide, from a list of readily available engineering materials to detailed blueprints and machining steps. Extensive calibration and testing protocols, provided in the supporting information, are included along with guidelines for operating the rig at synchrotron radiation facility beamlines. Heitt Mjölnir does not require any dedicated software or specific infrastructure. It uses a non-toxic liquid/hydraulic pressure medium, ensuring compliance with safety requirements for most imaging beamlines. We stress that anyone aiming to replicate Heitt Mjölnir must ensure that they follow the statutory safety requirements of the country and institution where they are based and where the replicate cell will be used to ensure that the cell is appropriately assessed, tested and approved for the planned experimental applications.

Heitt Mjölnir constitutes a design that overcomes major technical challenges to enable high pressure and temperature testing while acquiring synchrotron 4DµCT data. It is particularly adapted to geosciences applications that explore thermal, mechanical, hydraulic and chemical processes, bridging the gap between grain-scale developments and the resulting macroscale responses. Combined, Mjolnir (Butler et al., 2020), Heitt Mjölnir and their future derivatives form an experimental platform to study crustal rock deformation, metamorphic processes and fluid–rock interactions in subsurface geoenergy application storage and exploitation.

2. Design and construction

Heitt Mjölnir's design follows the Hoek cell geometry, widely used in rock triaxial deformation experiments (Hoek & Franklin, 1968). Radial confining pressure (σ₂ = σ₃ = P_c) is controlled by a fluid in a sealed metal pressure vessel. Differential stress is generated via axial solid compression applied to the sample (σ₁). The differential stress (Δσ) on the sample is defined as a function of the axial stress and confining pressure (Δσ = σ₁ − P_c). The effective differential stress on the sample is defined as: Δσ_eff = σ₁ − P_c − P_f, with P_f being the pore fluid pressure in the sample.

The rig, fully assembled, weighs about 6 kg, and stands 330 mm tall (Figs. 1 and 2) with a distance between the bottom of the base plate to the sample centre of 127.7 mm. The parts outside the X-ray beam path are made of grade 5 titanium. Components within the beam path are made from materials with greater X-ray transparency including 7068 aluminium alloy, graphite and polyether ether ketone (PEEK), except for the thin (<200 µm wall) copper jacket surrounding the sample (see below and Section S2 of the supporting information). O-ring seals are Viton or polytetra­fluoro­ethyl­ene (PTFE). All fluid connections to the cell use 10/32 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) connectors. A bill of materials and a cross-section drawing of the apparatus are shown in Fig. 1 and in the supporting information (Section S1, Tables S1 and S2). Technical drawings of all components are listed in Section S1 of the supporting information and provided in separate files. Notes on construction detailing the design choices and operation mode of the rig are given in Section S2 of the supporting information. In the following section, the different parts of the device are described from the core (sample) outwards to the external parts.

Figure 1 Bill of materials (a), outer and inner dimensions (b, c) and sectional drawing (c) of Heitt Mjölnir, and a photograph of the apparatus deployed at the TOMCAT beamline of the Swiss Light Source synchrotron at PSI, Switzerland (d). Numbers and letters labelled on parts (b), (c) and (d) refer to items on the bill of material (a). CAD drawings for each component are provided in the supporting information. All dimensions are in mm.

Figure 2 (a) Cartoon schematic of the layout and connection between Heitt Mjölnir and the high-pressure syringes, LVDT (black), power cables (red), thermocouples (green) and fluid (blue) connections for routine operation. (1) Type-K thermocouple(s) fixed on the pressure vessel. (2) Linear variable displacement transducer. (3) Temperature controller with two channels for top and bottom cartridge heaters (red shaded areas inside the pressure vessel). (4) Three fluid manifolds composed of Top Industrie valves (TIV) to disconnect the cell from the pump and refill (refill syringe) without dropping the cell pressure. Each fluid line must be equipped with a proportional pressure relief valve (PRV). Connections to PEEK tubing are via Swagelok 1/16" bulkhead unions. (5) Three Cetoni Nemesys high-pressure syringe pumps provide independent fluid delivery for the confining pressure (sky blue), pore fluid pressure (blue) and axial load via the hydraulic actuator (purple). (6) CETONI I/O module. (7) Laptop PC with QmixElements software to control the high-pressure pumps (5) and log experimental data (7). Solid lines indicate external cable or tubing while dotted lines indicate their continuation inside the cell. (8) Intel cooling fan for the pressure vessel and its associated 12 V DC power supply (9). (b) Heitt Mjölnir in position and set up for operation on the rotary table of the TOMCAT beamline at the Swiss Light Source. Letters correspond to those in (a). The Heitt Mjölnir rig is fixed on the rotary table at approximately 1400 mm height above floor level.

In the centre of the rig, the cylindrical sample is held between the two vertical pistons and is sleeved in a thermally annealed copper jacket (see Section S2 of the supporting information, and Fig. 3) of 200 µm wall thickness. This jacket is sealed on each end against the pistons via a set of UniLok NiTiNb heat-shrinkable metal rings (Intrinsic Devices). A high thermal conductivity graphite sleeve (grade 6507) is slid over the jacket. Both the jacket and the graphite sleeve thermally bond the pistons and sample to provide a homogeneous heat distribution in the sample zone (see Section S3 and Fig. S2 of the supporting information). We chose copper as the jacket material because of the high temperatures reached in the sample zone, the need for heat conduction performance and pressure transmission on the sample, while making a reliable seal against the confining fluid (ductility). A detailed discussion on the constraints and alternative materials can be found in Section S2.1 of the supporting information.

Figure 3 Copper jacket deformation during high pressure and temperature runs. Panels (a), (b) and (c) are 2D slices acquired at the I12 JEEP beamline of Diamond Light Source during a basalt carbonation experiment at confining pressures of 0.1, 1 and 20 MPa, respectively. Panels (d) and (e) are 3D renderings of the copper jacket surface during a gypsum dehydration and deformation experiment at the TOMCAT beamline of the Swiss Light Source. The axial shortening was 1.18 mm in (e) (6% of strain). Arrows (1) and (2) indicate the position of the sample/piston interfaces. Wrinkles and ridges (3) are due to the shortening of the sample under differential load during dehydration. (f) Photograph of the jacket after the experiments.

The pistons are made of grade 5 titanium, selected for its high tensile strength and temperature resistance (yield strength at 0.2% elongation of ∼850 MPa at 298 K and ∼730 MPa at 623 K). The top piston is made from a 10 mm centreless ground bar of titanium. The bottom piston is part of the bottom platen of the cell. This bottom platen is connected to the pressure vessel via six tensile grade 12.9 M8 socket screws. It is sealed using a BS023 PTFE O-ring. Both bottom and top pistons were drilled with a 3.2 mm-diameter hole to pass the 1/8" cartridge heating element and a 1 mm-diameter hole for pore fluid access (see the CAD-drawing in Section S1 and details in Section S2 of the supporting information).

The pressure vessel is a critical element of this apparatus. It must balance strength and stiffness against a minimal X-ray attenuation. In a heated device, the pressure vessel must retain its physical properties over the largest temperature range possible and remain unreactive to the confining fluids. To achieve this, we selected aluminium 7068 alloy, which is lightweight (moderate X-ray attenuation) yet has high tensile strength. This alloy offers a good yield strength (700 MPa at 0.2% elongation and 297 K) and retains most of its mechanical properties up to 473 K. Above that, the alloy strength decreases between 473 and 523 K, requiring careful thermal management of the cell temperature (see below). Alloy 7068 also offers good resistance to corrosion if used with silicone oil. Estimates of the radial, axial and hoop stress on the inner surface of the vessel (where hoop stress is maximal) indicate a total (axial + radial + hoop) stress of 258 MPa, at a confining pressure of 30 MPa and axial load of 40 kN (510 MPa on a 10 mm-diameter sample). This is significantly less than the alloy yield strength at temperatures above 373 K (about 590 MPa). The present configuration offers a safety factor of at least 2.3 (ratio of maximum stress over strength of the pressure vessel). In practice, the pressure vessel was designed for repeated and safe use at confining below pressures of 30 MPa and axial load of 40 kN, at maximum sample temperatures of 573 K (corresponding to a pressure vessel temperature of <373 K). Heitt Mjölnir has been designed for synchrotron beam times and we consider prolonged runs to last a maximum of one week. Before all experimental run series, the pressure vessel should be hydraulically tested beyond its operating loads in conformity with local pressure safety requirements. Given that the strength of the pressure vessel will degrade over time due to temperature and pressure cycling, this step is an obligatory safety requirement (see guidelines in Section 2.10 of the supporting information).

As noted previously, the pressure vessel must be protected from the very high temperatures reached in the sample area. Therefore, a set of PEEK baffles limit the volume of confining fluid, its advective motion and minimize radial conductive heat transfer thanks to the low thermal conductivity of PEEK (0.25 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹) and its high melting point (616 K) (Fig. 1, and Figs. S1 and S2 of the supporting information). This baffling combined with an external air-cooling stream onto the pressure vessel proved sufficient to keep its outside surface temperature below 373 K (see supporting Section S2 for details). As a safety indicator, we recommend always using the cell with a thermocouple fixed on the outer surface of the pressure vessel to monitor its efficient cooling below 373 K (see supporting Section S4).

The uppermost section of the rig generates and delivers the axial load to the sample and includes access for heating elements and pore fluid. The top end of the pressure vessel is bolted to the top platen and sealed in the same way as the bottom platen. The platen has a central hole to fit the top piston and a groove to fit the dynamic `piston' seal. The dynamic seal uses a single EM010 (10 mm inner diameter and 2 mm cross section) O-ring in Viton/FKM without a back-up ring. The uppermost section of the apparatus is held in place by the actuator carrier. This large titanium carrier is threaded directly onto the top platen. It has four windows, which allow access for wires and components located above the top piston. Its role is to hold the hydraulic actuator, which delivers axial load to the top piston.

The top piston is capped by the top piston cap, which facilitates access of heater power cables and thermocouple wires, as well as pressurized pore fluid through the top piston (Figs. 1 and 2, and the supporting CAD drawings). The pore fluid is sealed by two O-rings, creating a circumferential pressure seal, around the piston's end. The connection to the pore fluid bore of the top piston is made via a 1 mm hole drilled at right angles to the long piston axis. A 1/16" stainless steel tube was brazed into the cap and fitted with a 1/16" Swagelok union. On top of the top piston cap, a tell-tale is inserted to work with a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT, also linear variable displacement transducer) to measure the piston displacement and calculate the sample strain. The LVDT is clamped in an external aluminium ring fixed at the top of the actuator carrier. On top of the top piston cap, the connection with the actuator is made using a slotted spacer, which prevents mechanical loading of the thermocouple and heater cables.

The axial load delivered to the sample via the top piston is generated by an Enerpac CST 40132 single acting actuator cylinder threaded into the actuator carrier. The maximum stroke is 13 mm and the maximum delivered load is 39.2 kN. A calibration of actuator load versus applied ram pressure is given in Section S5 of the supporting information and Fig. S3. A stiffness calibration, necessary for deformation studies, is given in Section S6 of the supporting information and Fig. S4.

The fluid pressure for the actuator axial load, the confining and the pore fluid pressure are all delivered by high-pressure Cetoni Nemesys HP-syringe pump modules (see detail in Fig. 2 and Section 3). These are remotely controlled by using QmixElements software which offers control on the flow rate and PID control of the pump pressure. Each pump is connected to a manifold (using Swagelok and Top Industrie unions and valves) which facilitates refilling the pump without disconnecting the cell. Flexible fluid lines of 1/16" PEEK tubing enable cell rotation. All commercial fittings and tubing used have pressure specifications higher than the targeted experimental range for this apparatus.

In Heitt Mjölnir, the heating system is internal and located within the cell pistons, using Watlow Firerod cartridge heaters (1/8" diameter) with 75 or 100 W maximum power capacity. The heaters use Watlow EZ-ZONE controllers driving Watlow DIN-A-MITE solid-state power controllers. The two cartridge heaters have their own internal type-K thermocouple. Sample temperature cannot be measured directly in the current design, but it has been calibrated using modified top and bottom pistons allowing temperature profiling inside the pressure vessel and sample (see Sections S1 and S4 and Fig. S2 of the supporting information).

3. Operation of the cell and data acquisition

4. Calibration of the apparatus: mechanical testing (pressure, stiffness), heat distribution and temperature gradients

Heitt Mjölnir was tested in offline experiments using both the prototype and the final versions to better understand its mechanical behaviour, heat distribution and fluid transfer in the cell. These tests demonstrated the stability of the apparatus for a duration of at least a week at maximum temperature.

The actuator fluid pressure versus resultant axial load and resulting sample pressure were calibrated using a 50 kN load cell (see Section S5 and Fig. S3 for details). We found the relationship to be linear above axial loads of 0.24 kN (1 MPa of actuator fluid pressure) up to 40 kN (resulting in sample axial pressures >500 MPa). We further quantified the stiffness of the apparatus using uniaxial and triaxial compression of a grade 5 titanium dummy sample (see Section S6 and Fig. S4). The stiffness value is 7.1 GPa and 7.3 GPa in uniaxial and triaxial tests, respectively. Heitt Mjölnir behaves in a repetitive manner and only has a small hysteresis during unloading. The equations to retrieve sample strain from the apparent strain, necessary for rock deformation studies, are given in Section S6. Both load and stiffness calibrations given in this manuscript used the recommended sample dimensions (10.0 mm diameter by 20.0 mm length).

Additional offline testing measured the temperature distribution inside and outside the rig. The temperature gradient within the sample was measured to be below 0.5 K mm⁻¹ (Section S4 and Fig. S2). A setpoint of 623 K for the heating cartridges yielded a sample temperature of 584 K in the sample centre with less than 373 K on the outside surface of the air-cooled pressure vessel. The temperature of 623 K at the piston hot spots corresponds to the maximum operating temperature capability for silicone oils and defines the effective maximum temperature limit of the device.

A discussion on accuracy, precision and errors of thermal and mechanical parameters inferred from the rig is provided in Section S8.

5. Examples of deployment and data acquisition

5.1. Setup and deployment at synchrotron imaging beamlines

Heitt Mjölnir was first deployed on the TOMCAT beamline X02DA of the Swiss Light Source (SLS), Villigen, Switzerland, in June 2021. It was deployed again at the same beamline several times in 2021 and 2022. The apparatus has also been deployed at beamline I-12 Joint Engineering, Environmental and Processing (JEEP) at Diamond Light Source (DLS), Didcot, UK, in 2022, and at Synchrotron SOLEIL's (CNRS–CEA Paris-Saclay) PSICHÉ (Pression Structure Imagerie par Contraste à Haute Énergie) beamline, Saint-Aubin, France, in June 2023. Examples of data acquired during these beamline visits are presented in Figs. 4, 5 and 6. They highlight the capabilities of the device, its versatility and flexibility for deployment at various beamlines, as well as sufficient transparency at these tomography beamlines powered by a third-generation synchrotron source. In the following section, we provide information about the beam type and setups to ease and facilitate the setup of Heitt Mjölnir at these imaging beamlines. These instructions are useful for beamline staff to establish conditions under which high-quality images can be obtained (see Figs. 4, 5 and 6 for comparison of results at different facilities).

Figure 4 Time evolution of calcium sulfate reactants and products through a gradual temperature increase during a triaxial deformation experiment at the TOMCAT beamline (SLS). 2D slices show the progressive transformation of gypsum (dark grey) (a) to gypsum + bassanite (light grey) (b), bassanite (c) and anhydrite (light grey) (d). The dark moats surrounding bassanite and anhydrite needles are fluid-filled porosity. The bright unreactive phase is celestite. Tomography volumes were acquired with a sample–detector distance of 2500 mm. The scale bar at the bottom left of the image is 1 mm long.

Figure 5 Time evolution of a pre-cut (45°) gypsum sample during its partial dehydration while under triaxial conditions at the TOMCAT beamline (SLS). Couples (a, b), (c, d), (e, f) and (g, h) show the gradual dehydration with a view at the sample scale and local scale on the top [(a), (c), (e) and (g)] and bottom [(b), (d), (f) and (h)] rows, respectively. The scan interval is 6 min [30 min between (c), (e) and (g)]. The position of the cut plane at 45° is highlighted by the red arrows and dashed lines when poorly visible. Phases present are gypsum (dark grey), bassanite (light grey), pores (black) and celestite (white) and are indicated by the yellow arrows. Tomography volumes were acquired with a sample–detector distance of 500 mm.

Figure 6 Vertical cross sections of diverse types of samples and experiments acquired at the TOMCAT, I12 JEEP and PSICHÉ beamlines. (a) Dehydrated gypsum sample into anhydrite (TOMCAT). (b) Gypsum dehydration into bassanite (PSICHÉ). (c) Bassanite rehydration into gypsum (PSICHÉ). (d) Serpentinite from Shiraga belt in Japan (TOMCAT). (e) Picrite from Faroe Islands (TOMCAT). (f) Porous basalt from Iceland (DLS). Space was left in between the subvolumes because they do not perfectly overlap. Tomography volumes at the TOMCAT beamline were acquired with a sample–detector distance of 190 mm (d) and 2500 mm (a, e).

Time-resolved µCT data at TOMCAT were acquired using filtered white-beam radiation. The SLS storage ring has an electron beam energy of 2.4 GeV and a beam current of 400 mA. The white X-ray beam is provided by a 2.9 T super-bend magnet and was filtered with 20 mm of glassy carbon, 350 µm of molybdenum and 12 mm of borosilicate glass filters. We used a 150 µm LuAG:Ce scintillator from Crytur, Czech Republic. This heavily hardened X-ray beam had a peak energy of 59 keV. Transmission through the cell was about 11% of the incident radiation with the filters in place (including the gypsum sample and a copper jacket with a wall thickness of 70 µm). The extensive simulation of the beam energy spectrum and X-ray flux for the beamline and Heitt Mjolnir is given in Section S7 and Fig. S5. While most of the flux from the incident beam, predominantly at lower energies, is absorbed by the filters, the amount of transmitted radiation at higher energies was sufficient to achieve scanning frequencies of a few minutes, compatible with the geological processes investigated in our experiments. The GigaFRoST camera system (Mokso et al., 2017) was used in conjunction with a high-numerical-aperture macroscope with a four-fold magnification (Bührer et al., 2019). The native pixel size of this detection system is 2.75 µm. Different sample–detector distances were investigated from 190 mm [Fig. 6(d)] to 500 mm (Fig. 5) and 2500 mm [Figs. 4, 6(a) and 6(e)], where best imaging quality was obtained for phase retrieval using the algorithm based on the work of Paganin et al. (2002). With a source–sample distance of about 25 m at the beamline and a propagation distance of 2500 mm, the resulting effective voxel edge size is 2.5 µm in the collected images.

Scan durations depend upon the mode of data acquisition. Fast scans were acquired using a 180° cell rotation. These scans were performed with 2000 projections, an exposure time of 28 ms and yielded a temporal resolution of about 1 scan per minute. The effective field of view at TOMCAT is 2.0 mm high (limited by the extent of the X-ray beam) and 5.0 mm wide. Given the size of the sample, we found this configuration was suitable for region-of-interest scans but limited the amount of contextual information acquired on the sample such as bulk strain, fracture extent or sample-scale fluid pathways. For these reasons, when high temporal resolution is not needed, a 360° cell rotation with an off-centred rotation axis was preferred. The duration of each scan was 2 min with 4000 projections and an exposure time of 28 ms. These scans provided the ability to acquire the full 10 mm diameter of the sample with a vertical field of view of 2.0 mm. A series of 11 overlapping vertical translations was necessary to provide a full sample volume tomography. Consequently, the combined high-quality imaging of the full sample required about 25 min (2 min per 360° scan, vertical translations, and flat and dark fields). The data volume acquired was 132 GB for a full sample volume (12 GB per scan), requiring careful preliminary considerations for data processing, management and storage.

At I12 JEEP, the cell was mounted in the I12 Experimental Hutch 1 with sample table configuration 1. The DLS storage ring has an electron beam with an energy of 3 GeV and a beam current of 300 mA. Polychromatic X-rays are provided by a 4.2 T superconducting wiggler and subsequently monochromated to 70 keV, not using any additional filters, producing a slightly divergent beam on the sample. Their high-resolution camera with optical module 3 was used to produce a reconstructed voxel size of 3.24 µm. 2000 projections of 11 ms exposure were acquired over a 360° rotation, resulting in scan durations of about 4 min (including camera readout). The sample–detector distance for these scans was 500 mm.

At PSICHÉ, Heitt Mjölnir was deployed in the first experimental hutch (optics hutch) and using the polychromatic imaging mode (fast or high-energy filtered white-beam tomography) of the beamline. The SOLEIL storage ring has an X-ray beam energy of 2.75 GeV and an electron beam current of 450 mA. The sample was irradiated with a white X-ray beam coming from a 2.1 T multipole wiggler and was filtered with 1.5 mm aluminium, 5.6 mm copper and 0.6 mm lead filters for an average energy of 90 keV. We used a 250 µm LuAG:Ce scintillator and a Hasselblad tandem 2.1× magnification lens. The beam energy was tested at 67 and 90 keV and transmission was estimated to be above 8% at 67 keV with the filters in place (with gypsum samples and a copper jacket wall thickness of 200 µm). The sample–detector distance on this setup was found optimal at 300 mm, where longer propagation distances introduced blurring due to beam divergence. The detector used was a Hamamatsu ORCA Flash 4.0 and the effective voxel edge length was 2.84 µm. Scans were acquired using 5700 projections with an exposure time of 15 ms and realized with a 360° cell rotation with the rotation axis offset to extend the horizontal field of view. The beam size was 5.8 mm × 2.9 mm, and a single reconstructed volume comprised 10.9 mm × 10.9 mm × 2.9 mm. A total of seven to eight overlapping blocks were necessary to image the full sample. The combined imaging of the full sample required about 18 min (2 min per 360° scan, vertical translations, and flat and dark fields). Single scans represent a total of 32 GB per reconstructed volume (16 bits) and 255 GB for a full sample volume.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, we present the design concept, technical specifications and operating procedures for Heitt Mjölnir, an internally heated triaxial apparatus for 4D synchrotron microtomography. This internally heated rig works with a sample of 10 mm diameter by 20 mm length with a confining and pore fluid pressure range of <30 MPa and 500 MPa axial load, at sample temperatures up to 573 K. The design of the rig ensures low thermal gradients within the sample while maintaining a good transparency to X-ray beams. This manuscript provides detailed guidelines for assembly and operation of the apparatus at imaging beamlines together with calibrations and estimates of device precision.

The rig, when combined with the appropriate imaging arrangements, produces high-quality data with spatial and temporal resolutions suitable for imaging a wide range of dynamic processes at both grain and sample scales.

It enables mechanical testing under diverse conditions relevant to the subsurface. It allows the exploration of physico-chemical-hydraulic feedbacks during metamorphic reactions, at conditions up to the top of greenschist and hornfels facies. The design also enables studies in the areas of mineral resources and subsurface storage, including radioactive waste repositories and CO₂ sequestration.

7. Related literature

The following reference, not cited in the main body of the paper, have been cited in the supporting information: Klementiev & Chernikov (2014).