Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, C11H10N2O2, was prepared by the esterfication of 5-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid with methanol. The phenyl ring is rotated out of the pyrazole plane, forming a dihedral angle of 6.4 (1)°. The crystal structure is stabilized by inter­molecular aromatic π–π inter­actions [with a centroid–centroid distance of 3.862 (3) Å between the pyrazole ring and the benzene ring of a neighboring mol­ecule], and by three different types of hydrogen bond (N—H...N, N—H...O and C—H...O).

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807052452/lx2019sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807052452/lx2019Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 630270

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.044
  • wR factor = 0.120
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.1

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level G PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature . 293 K
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 0 ALERT level C = Check and explain 2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The coordination chemistry of pyrazole and its derivatives has been received great attention since poly(pyrazolyl)borate was found (Trofimenko, 1972). The electron donor (nitrogen) of non-substituted pyrazole unit can coordinate to many metal ions such as copper and vanadium, etc. (Otieno et al., 2002; Xing et al., 2007). When the carboxyl group as the substitutent at three or five position on the pyrazole ring is present, this will enhance the coordination capability of the pyrazole ring, and the substituted carboxyl group and the pyrazole ring with the metal ion can form a steady five-member cycle (Roussel et al., 2006). Herein we report the molecular and crystal structure of the title compound, methyl 5-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid (Fig. 1).

The crystal structure of the title compound (Fig. 1) indicates that the phenyl plane was not coplanar with the pyrazole plane, with their dihedron angle of 6.4 (1)°. All the bond lengths of the pyrazole ring are close to the corresponding bond lengths of ethyl 5-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylate as reported previously (Infantes et al., 1999). The molecular packing (Fig. 2) is stabilized by π···π stacking interactions between the pyrazole ring and the benzene ring of adjacent molecule, with the Cg1···Cg2 distance of 3.862 (3) Å (Cg1 and Cg2 are the centorids of the C7—C9/N2—N1 pyrazole ring and the C1—C6 benzene ring, respectively; symmetry code as in Fig. 2). The molecular packing is further stabilized by three different hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2 and Table 1).

Related literature top

For the coordination chemistry of similar pyrazol derivatives, see: Trofimenko (1972); Xing et al. (2007); Infantes et al. (1999). For related literature, see: Otieno et al. (2002); Roussel et al. (2006).

Experimental top

CuCl2 (40.0 mg, 0.21 mmol) was added into the methanol (10 ml) gently, the suspension was kept stirring at room temperature until the solution turned clear green, after which, 5-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid (36.3 mg, 0.21 mmol) was added, then HCl (6.0M, 1.0 ml) was dropped in and stirred for 7 h continuously. Precipitate was filtered off and the filtrate was kept in conical flask for about one month and some pretty colorless rhombic crystals were obtained from the solution, dried in vacuum. Yield: 31.2%. Crystal of the title compound suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction was selected directly from the sample as prepared.

Refinement top

All H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C—H = 0.93 Å for aromatic H atoms, 0.96 Å for methyl H atoms and 0.86 Å for Nitrogen H atoms, respectively, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) for aromatic and methylene H atoms, Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H atoms and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N) for Nitrogen H atoms.

Structure description top

The coordination chemistry of pyrazole and its derivatives has been received great attention since poly(pyrazolyl)borate was found (Trofimenko, 1972). The electron donor (nitrogen) of non-substituted pyrazole unit can coordinate to many metal ions such as copper and vanadium, etc. (Otieno et al., 2002; Xing et al., 2007). When the carboxyl group as the substitutent at three or five position on the pyrazole ring is present, this will enhance the coordination capability of the pyrazole ring, and the substituted carboxyl group and the pyrazole ring with the metal ion can form a steady five-member cycle (Roussel et al., 2006). Herein we report the molecular and crystal structure of the title compound, methyl 5-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid (Fig. 1).

The crystal structure of the title compound (Fig. 1) indicates that the phenyl plane was not coplanar with the pyrazole plane, with their dihedron angle of 6.4 (1)°. All the bond lengths of the pyrazole ring are close to the corresponding bond lengths of ethyl 5-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylate as reported previously (Infantes et al., 1999). The molecular packing (Fig. 2) is stabilized by π···π stacking interactions between the pyrazole ring and the benzene ring of adjacent molecule, with the Cg1···Cg2 distance of 3.862 (3) Å (Cg1 and Cg2 are the centorids of the C7—C9/N2—N1 pyrazole ring and the C1—C6 benzene ring, respectively; symmetry code as in Fig. 2). The molecular packing is further stabilized by three different hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2 and Table 1).

For the coordination chemistry of similar pyrazol derivatives, see: Trofimenko (1972); Xing et al. (2007); Infantes et al. (1999). For related literature, see: Otieno et al. (2002); Roussel et al. (2006).

Computing details top

Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997b); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997b); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997a) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1998); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997a).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound, showing displacement ellipsoides drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing arrangement of the title compound along b axis. Cg denotes the ring centroids. [Symmetry code: (i) -x + 1/2, y - 1/2, -z + 1/2; (ii) -x, -y + 1,-z; (iii) -x + 1/2, y + 1/2, -z + 1/2; (iv) x, y - 1, z; (v) x, y + 1, z.]
Methyl 5-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylate top
Crystal data top
C11H10N2O2F(000) = 848
Mr = 202.21Dx = 1.331 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMelting point = 185.5–185.9 K
Hall symbol: -c 2ycMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 24.540 (6) ÅCell parameters from 2416 reflections
b = 5.980 (1) Åθ = 2.5–29.0°
c = 16.387 (4) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
β = 122.933 (2)°T = 293 K
V = 2018.3 (8) Å3Rhombic, colorless
Z = 80.20 × 0.15 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
1612 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.022
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Detector resolution: 10.0 pixels mm-1h = 3131
ω scansk = 75
5591 measured reflectionsl = 2020
2185 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.120H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0548P)2 + 0.752P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2185 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
136 parametersΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.22 e Å3
Crystal data top
C11H10N2O2V = 2018.3 (8) Å3
Mr = 202.21Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 24.540 (6) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
b = 5.980 (1) ÅT = 293 K
c = 16.387 (4) Å0.20 × 0.15 × 0.05 mm
β = 122.933 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker P4
diffractometer
1612 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
5591 measured reflectionsRint = 0.022
2185 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0440 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.120H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.21 e Å3
2185 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.22 e Å3
136 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.17604 (8)0.1789 (3)0.03661 (12)0.0476 (4)
H10.21850.14880.08700.057*
C20.16326 (10)0.3570 (3)0.02517 (13)0.0580 (5)
H20.19730.44560.01620.070*
C30.10077 (10)0.4042 (3)0.09971 (14)0.0594 (5)
H30.09240.52420.14100.071*
C40.05089 (9)0.2733 (3)0.11276 (13)0.0563 (5)
H40.00850.30540.16310.068*
C50.06269 (8)0.0947 (3)0.05225 (11)0.0471 (4)
H50.02830.00690.06230.057*
C60.12571 (7)0.0444 (3)0.02380 (10)0.0365 (4)
C70.13661 (7)0.1465 (3)0.08722 (10)0.0349 (3)
C80.09485 (7)0.3081 (3)0.08165 (10)0.0373 (4)
H80.05080.32210.03450.045*
C90.13253 (7)0.4464 (3)0.16157 (10)0.0358 (4)
C100.11091 (8)0.6429 (3)0.19061 (11)0.0398 (4)
C110.14358 (11)0.9382 (3)0.30373 (15)0.0663 (6)
H11A0.18210.99620.36040.099*
H11B0.11260.89830.31980.099*
H11C0.12521.05020.25370.099*
N10.19519 (6)0.1955 (2)0.16806 (9)0.0405 (3)
H1N0.22960.11770.18720.049*
N20.19433 (6)0.3774 (2)0.21536 (9)0.0413 (3)
O10.05575 (6)0.7053 (2)0.14871 (10)0.0640 (4)
O20.15988 (6)0.7429 (2)0.26949 (8)0.0522 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0431 (9)0.0528 (11)0.0442 (9)0.0067 (8)0.0219 (8)0.0001 (8)
C20.0669 (13)0.0531 (11)0.0609 (11)0.0143 (9)0.0392 (10)0.0002 (9)
C30.0805 (14)0.0510 (11)0.0535 (11)0.0026 (10)0.0409 (11)0.0100 (9)
C40.0554 (11)0.0605 (12)0.0454 (9)0.0107 (9)0.0225 (8)0.0135 (9)
C50.0383 (9)0.0530 (10)0.0430 (9)0.0004 (8)0.0176 (7)0.0066 (8)
C60.0374 (8)0.0391 (8)0.0326 (7)0.0008 (6)0.0188 (7)0.0036 (6)
C70.0292 (7)0.0378 (8)0.0328 (7)0.0017 (6)0.0138 (6)0.0023 (6)
C80.0254 (7)0.0401 (9)0.0361 (8)0.0004 (6)0.0100 (6)0.0011 (6)
C90.0296 (8)0.0363 (8)0.0371 (8)0.0011 (6)0.0152 (6)0.0030 (6)
C100.0383 (9)0.0364 (9)0.0426 (8)0.0022 (7)0.0207 (7)0.0010 (7)
C110.0917 (16)0.0487 (12)0.0713 (13)0.0093 (10)0.0526 (12)0.0182 (10)
N10.0269 (7)0.0431 (8)0.0414 (7)0.0048 (5)0.0121 (6)0.0022 (6)
N20.0322 (7)0.0402 (7)0.0412 (7)0.0002 (6)0.0132 (6)0.0041 (6)
O10.0428 (7)0.0590 (8)0.0755 (9)0.0109 (6)0.0227 (7)0.0104 (7)
O20.0491 (7)0.0479 (7)0.0538 (7)0.0055 (5)0.0242 (6)0.0153 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.383 (2)C7—C81.375 (2)
C1—C61.391 (2)C8—C91.392 (2)
C1—H10.9300C8—H80.9300
C2—C31.374 (3)C9—N21.339 (2)
C2—H20.9300C9—C101.471 (2)
C3—C41.368 (3)C10—O11.197 (2)
C3—H30.9300C10—O21.336 (2)
C4—C51.377 (2)C11—O21.443 (2)
C4—H40.9300C11—H11A0.9600
C5—C61.393 (2)C11—H11B0.9600
C5—H50.9300C11—H11C0.9600
C6—C71.467 (2)N1—N21.342 (2)
C7—N11.355 (2)N1—H1N0.8600
C2—C1—C6120.36 (16)C7—C8—C9105.38 (13)
C2—C1—H1119.8C7—C8—H8127.3
C6—C1—H1119.8C9—C8—H8127.3
C3—C2—C1120.56 (17)N2—C9—C8111.80 (13)
C3—C2—H2119.7N2—C9—C10120.80 (13)
C1—C2—H2119.7C8—C9—C10127.38 (14)
C4—C3—C2119.54 (17)O1—C10—O2123.87 (15)
C4—C3—H3120.2O1—C10—C9123.93 (14)
C2—C3—H3120.2O2—C10—C9112.21 (13)
C3—C4—C5120.74 (17)O2—C11—H11A109.5
C3—C4—H4119.6O2—C11—H11B109.5
C5—C4—H4119.6H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C4—C5—C6120.56 (16)O2—C11—H11C109.5
C4—C5—H5119.7H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C6—C5—H5119.7H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C1—C6—C5118.25 (15)N2—N1—C7113.48 (12)
C1—C6—C7122.54 (14)N2—N1—H1N123.3
C5—C6—C7119.21 (14)C7—N1—H1N123.3
N1—C7—C8105.59 (13)C9—N2—N1103.74 (12)
N1—C7—C6123.29 (13)C10—O2—C11116.42 (14)
C8—C7—C6131.11 (13)
C6—C1—C2—C30.3 (3)C7—C8—C9—N20.41 (18)
C1—C2—C3—C40.1 (3)C7—C8—C9—C10178.60 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C50.2 (3)N2—C9—C10—O1175.69 (16)
C3—C4—C5—C60.3 (3)C8—C9—C10—O12.4 (3)
C2—C1—C6—C50.2 (2)N2—C9—C10—O24.0 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C7179.99 (15)C8—C9—C10—O2178.00 (14)
C4—C5—C6—C10.1 (2)C8—C7—N1—N20.08 (17)
C4—C5—C6—C7179.73 (15)C6—C7—N1—N2179.93 (13)
C1—C6—C7—N16.1 (2)C8—C9—N2—N10.45 (17)
C5—C6—C7—N1173.74 (14)C10—C9—N2—N1178.78 (13)
C1—C6—C7—C8173.71 (16)C7—N1—N2—C90.33 (17)
C5—C6—C7—C86.5 (2)O1—C10—O2—C110.4 (2)
N1—C7—C8—C90.19 (16)C9—C10—O2—C11179.90 (14)
C6—C7—C8—C9179.64 (15)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···N2i0.862.202.998 (2)153
N1—H1N···O2i0.862.523.134 (2)130
C5—H5···O1ii0.932.523.372 (2)153
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC11H10N2O2
Mr202.21
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)24.540 (6), 5.980 (1), 16.387 (4)
β (°) 122.933 (2)
V3)2018.3 (8)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.15 × 0.05
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker P4
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5591, 2185, 1612
Rint0.022
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.639
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.044, 0.120, 1.05
No. of reflections2185
No. of parameters136
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.21, 0.22

Computer programs: XSCANS (Siemens, 1996), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997b), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997b), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997a) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1998).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···N2i0.862.202.998 (2)153.4
N1—H1N···O2i0.862.523.134 (2)129.5
C5—H5···O1ii0.932.523.372 (2)153.0
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds