Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:34:46.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Components and mechanisms of resistance in selected field pea Pisum sativum lines to the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

K. Ali ,
S. van den M. Louw  and
W.J. Swart
K. Ali*
Affiliation:
Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Department of Zoology and Entomology
S. van den M. Louw
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, PO Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
W.J. Swart
Affiliation:
University of the Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
*
*E-mail: kemalnegeyo@yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Six field pea Pisum sativum (L.), lines (Holetta Local-90, 305PS210687, 061K-2P-2/9/2, 061K-2P-14/7/1, JI-898 and 304WA1101937) were screened in a greenhouse for their resistance to the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and compared to NEP874UK line (control). The total number of progeny and the average and maximum number of nymphs produced per female during a 24-h period were significantly lower in the six lines compared to the control. The intrinsic rate of increase was also significantly higher in the control than in the other lines (except Holetta Local-90). The aphid preferred to feed on the control than on the tested lines. Line 061K-2P2/9/2 was the most resistant genotype as its height and weight were less affected by aphid attack. Based on antibiosis, antixenosis and tolerance effects, lines 061K-2P2/9/2, JI-896 and 304WA1101937T performed better against A. pisum.

Keywords

Acyrthosiphon pisuminsect developmentfecunditystrainsfield peaSouth AfricaEthiopia
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 114 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, K. (2002) An integrated approach to pest management in field pea, Pisum sativum (L.), with emphasis on pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). PhD thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 313 ppGoogle Scholar
Bieri, M., Baumgärtner, J., Bianchi, G., Delucchi, R., Von, Arx V. (1983) Development and fecundity of pea aphid ( Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris) as affected by constant temperatures and pea varieties. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 56, 163–171.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Mackaur, M. (1977) Reproduction and population growth of the pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) under laboratory and field conditions. Canadian Entomology 109, 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahms, R. G., Painter, R. H. (1940) Rate of reproduction of the pea aphid on different alfalfa plants. Journal of Economic Entomology 33, 482–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damte, T. (1999) Influence of different cultivars of lentil, Lens culinaris, on life history traits of pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae) Unpublished MSc thesis of George August Universitaet, Goettingen, Germany.Google Scholar
De Loach, C. J. (1974) Rate of increase of populations of cabbage, green peach and turnip aphids at constant temperatures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 67, 332–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, R. W. (1994) New herbage cultivars, Medicago sativa L. (lucerne) cv. Alfanafa (syn. Sirosal). Tropical Grasslands 28, 191–192.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. A., Kempton, D. P. H. (1972) Resistance to attack by Brevicoryne brassicae among plants of Brussels sprouts. Annals of Applied Biology 72, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girousse, C., Bournoville, R. (1994) Role of phloem sap quality and exudation characteristics on performance of pea aphid grown in lucerne genotypes. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 70, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtkamp, R. H., Clift, A. D. (1993) Establishment of three species of lucerne aphids on 24 cultivars of lucerne. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, W. D., Hogg, D. B. (1984) Demographic statistics for the pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Wisconsin and a comparison with other populations. Environmental Entomology 13, 1173–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inayatullah, C., Webster, J. A., Fargo, W. S. (1990) Index for measuring plant resistance to insects. Entomologist 109, 146–152.Google Scholar
Lammerink, S. (1968) A new biotype of cabbage aphid ( Brevicoryne brassicae (L.)) on aphid resistant rape ( Brassica napus L.). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, S. R., Dixon, A. F. G. (1984) Aphid growth and reproductive rates. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 35, 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markkula, M., Roukka, K. (1971) Resistance of plants to the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Homoptera: Aphididae). III. Fecundity on different pea varieties. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 10, 33–37.Google Scholar
Maxwell, F. G., Jenkins, J. N., Parrott, W. L. (1972) Resistance of plants to insects. Advances in Agronomy 24, 187–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, F. J., Sorenson, S. M. (2001) Effectiveness of lacewing larvae in reducing Russian wheat aphid populations on susceptible and resistant wheat. Biological Control 21, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D., Walters, K. F. A., Aegerter, J. N. (2001) Effect of temperature and cultivar on pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae) life history. Bulletin of Entomological Research 91, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MSTAT-C (1990) User's guide to MSTAT-C: A software program for the design, management and analysis of agronomic research experiments. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
Newman, W., Pimentel, D. (1974) Garden pea resistant to the pea aphid. Journal of Economic Entomology 67, 365–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, G. E., Morrison, F. B. (1924) New facts in farm science. Control of pea aphid. Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 362, 61–64.Google Scholar
Sandström, J. (1994) High variation in host adaptation among clones of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum on peas, Pisum sativum. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 71, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweissing, F. C., Wilde, G. (1979) Predisposition and non preference of green bug for certain host cultivars. Environmental Entomology 8, 1070–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. M. (1989) Plant Resistance to Insects: A Fundamental Approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 286 pp.Google Scholar
Soroka, J. J., Mackay, P. A. (1991) Antibiosis and antixenosis to pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in cultivars of field peas. Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 1951–1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Emden, H. F. (1990) The interaction of host plant resistance to insects with other control measures Proceeding of the 17th Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Pest and Diseases 939–948.Google Scholar
Wiktelius, S., Pattersson, J. (1985) Simulation of bird cherry–oat aphid population dynamics: A total for development strategies for breeding aphid-resistant plants. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 14, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, I. J., White, P. R. (1977) Simple estimation of intrinsic increase rates for aphids and tetranychid mites. Journal of Applied Ecology 14, 757–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, F., Pederson, G. A., Davis, F. M., Ellsbury, M. M. (1993) Modalities of resistance of N-2 red clover germplasm to pea aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of Agricultural Entomology 11, 349–359.Google Scholar