Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Short Research Article

The Development of the Missing-Letter Effect Revisited

The Role of Word Frequency and Word Function

Published Online:January 19, 2023https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000565

Abstract

Abstract. When participants read a text for comprehension while identifying a target letter, the letter is more often missed in a frequent function word than in a less frequent content word. This is the missing-letter effect. Studies have shown the importance of both frequency and word function. The role of each of these factors in development is less understood. The goal of this study was to revisit the influence of frequency and word function in the missing-letter effect in development with better-controlled stimuli. Two hundred sixteen participants took part in this study and were divided into five groups (6–7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10–11 years, and university students). They were asked to read four experimental texts for comprehension and to circle a target letter. The results showed a basic missing-letter effect with more omissions for a frequent function word than a less frequent content word for every group. When frequency was controlled, we found a word function effect as early as 6–7 years of age, with more omissions for a function word than a content word. In contrast, when word function was controlled, an effect of frequency was only significant for adults and 8-year-olds. These results clarify discrepancies in the literature and support the importance of rigorous stimuli control.

References

  • Açık, A., Sarwary, A., Schultze-Kraft, R., Onat, S., & König, P. (2010). Developmental changes in natural viewing behavior: Bottom-up and top-down differences between children, young adults and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 207. 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00207 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Corcoran, D. W. J. (1966). An acoustic factor in letter cancellation. Nature, 210(5036), 658. 10.1038/210658a0 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection errors onthe andand : Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory & Cognition, 5(6), 636–647. 10.3758/BF03197410 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1980). Missing -ing in reading : Letter detection errors on word endings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(3), 247–262. 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90212-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Foucambert, D., & Baillé, J. (2011). Evolution of the missing-letter effect among young readers between ages 5 and 8. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 1–17. 10.1017/S0142716410000263 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, S. N., Healy, A. F., Koriat, A., & Kreiner, H. (2004). The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 428–433. 10.3758/BF03196590 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, S. N., Koriat, A., & Vellutino, F. R. (1998). Age changes in the missing-letter effect reflect the reader’s growing ability to extract the structure from text. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 69(3), 175–198. 10.1006/jecp.1998.2441 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the word the : Evidence for reading units larger than letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(2), 235–242. 10.1037/0096-1523.2.2.235 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Healy, A. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(3), 333–344. 10.3758/BF03213975 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Koriat, A., & Greenberg, S. N. (1991). Syntactic control of letter detection: Evidence from English and Hebrew nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1035–1050. 10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1035 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koriat, A., & Greenberg, S. N. (1994). The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(3), 345–356. 10.3758/BF03213976 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Koriat, A., & Greenberg, S. N. (1996). The enhancement effect in letter detection: Further evidence for the structural model of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1184–1195. 10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1184 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX : A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(1), 156–166. 10.3758/BF03195560 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Mohan, P. J. (1978). Acoustic factors in letter cancellation : Developmental considerations. Developmental Psychology, 14(1), 117–118. 10.1037/0012-1649.14.1.117 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roy-Charland, A., Collin, M.-M., & Richard, J. (2022). The development of the missing-letter effect revisited: The role of word frequency and word function. 10.17605/OSF.IO/9M7T5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roy-Charland, A., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2006). Short article : The interaction of word frequency and word class: A test of the GO model’s account of the missing-letter effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 38–45. 10.1080/17470210500269428 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Roy-Charland, A., Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M., & Lawrence, M. (2007). Eye movements as direct tests of the GO model for the missing-letter effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(3), 324–337. 10.3758/BF03193753 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Roy-Charland, A., Saint-Aubin, J., Lawrence, M. A., & Klein, R. M. (2009). Solving the chicken-and-egg problem of letter detection and fixation duration in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(7), 1553–1562. 10.3758/APP.71.7.1553 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Saint-Aubin, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 318–334. 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.318 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Saint-Aubin, J., & Klein, R. M. (2008). The influence of reading skills on the missing-letter effect among elementary school students. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 132–146. 10.1598/RRQ.43.2.2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M., & Landry, T. (2005). Age changes in the missing-letter effect revisited. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91(2), 158–182. 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.007 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M. (1997). The influence of word function in the missing-letter effect: Further evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 25(5), 666–676. 10.3758/BF03211308 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar