Tomayto, Tomahto?
An Empirical Comparison and Integration of Job Crafting Perspectives
Abstract
Abstract. Although job crafting finds widespread application as a leading approach to bottom-up work design, the foundation of the construct is rather shaky: two different theoretical perspectives exist within the research field that have largely been treated separately. An empirical examination of their congruency is missing so far, threatening construct validity, the informative value of the emerging literature, and comparability of effects in practice. In two studies, we investigated the comparability and possible integrative approaches for the two perspectives, including different versions of existing measurement instruments. Our results, based on two large samples of employees stemming from diverse backgrounds and countries (N1 = 295, N2 = 557), indicate distinct differences in terms of the internal structure of existing job crafting measures and with regard to theoretically anticipated relationships between subdimensions. A first empirical attempt to integrate both perspectives provided promising results for overarching approach/avoidance as well as targets of crafting factors. In general, our results provide cause for concern that the two perspectives should not be regarded as one uniform construct, nor should they be used interchangeably in theory or practice.
References
2011). Work without boundaries: Psychological perspectives on the new working life. Wiley. https://doi.org/ctzh92
(2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
. (2017). IBM SPSS Amos (Version 25). IBM SPSS.
(2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/cd5
(2010). Pro-self, pro-social, and pro-organizational foci of proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 475–498. https://doi.org/cpm3n3
(2010).
(Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations . In S. ZedeckEd., APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Volume 2. Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. 567–598). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/ck9t6z2019). Job crafting revisited: Implications of an extended framework for active changes at work. Journal of Applied psychology, 104(5), 605–628. https://doi.org/gfkbmm
(2015). Which employees craft their jobs and how? Basic dimensions of personality and employees’ job crafting behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(4), 631–655. https://doi.org/f7wjnc
(2020). Does job crafting always lead to employee well-being and performance? Meta-analytical evidence on the moderating role of societal culture. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–39. https://doi.org/fvzs
(2018). A role-resource approach-avoidance model of job crafting: A multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 499–522. https://doi.org/gdsh42
(2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 796–846. https://doi.org/fccf97
(2016).
(Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? . In A. E. KazdinEd., Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (pp. 133–139). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/gghxfn1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/fjbdsb
(2020). Evidence on the hierarchical, multidimensional nature of behavioural job crafting. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 311–341. https://doi.org/gg29gz
(2020). The power of doing: How job crafting transmits the beneficial impact of autonomy among overqualified employees. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 317–331. https://doi.org/fvzv
(2019).
(Job crafting interventions: Do they work and why? . In L. E. Van ZylS. RothmannEds., Positive psychological intervention design and protocols for multi-cultural contexts (pp. 103–125). Springer. https://doi.org/fv2b2018). Transmission of reduction-oriented crafting among colleagues: A diary study on the moderating role of working conditions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/gdkhfr
(2021). Supplementary material to “Tomayto, tomahto? An empircal comparison and integration of job crafting perspectives”. https://doi.org/gmt7
(2018). Individual job redesign: Job crafting interventions in healthcare. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 98–114. https://doi.org/ggcf69
(2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/b4hk6s
(2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/fv2d
(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/b7684f
(2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/dppm46
(1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/d9jhv3
(2020). Measuring model fit. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
(2015). Changes in work intensification and intensified learning: Challenge or hindrance demands? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(7), 786–800. https://doi.org/f3s5dj
(2019). A meta-analysis on promotion- and prevention-focused job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/gg3c5j
(1994). Sport motivation orientations: Beware of jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(4), 365–380.
(2012). The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers. Work Stress, 26(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/gfx5x4
(2016). Job design research and theory: Past, present and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 20–35. https://doi.org/cdds
(2019). Effectiveness of job crafting interventions: A meta-analysis and utility analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6), 723–741.
(2016).
(Designing work that works in the contemporary world: Future directions for job design research . In S. AkihitoR. Bin NordinM. DollardJ. OakmanEds., Psychosocial factors at work in the Asia Pacific (pp. 135–150). Springer. https://doi.org/fv2f2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/f93997
(2012). Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(8), 1120–1141. https://doi.org/vqt
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/czw
(2016). A constructively critical review of change and innovation-related concepts: Towards conceptual and operational clarity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/fvzp
(2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112–138. https://doi.org/gctpg2
(2016). Effects of a job crafting intervention program on work engagement among Japanese employees: A pretest-posttest study. BMC Psychology, 4(49), 1–9. https://doi.org/fvzq
(2019). Measuring job crafting across cultures: Lessons learned from comparing a german and an australian sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/fvzr
(1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/db6msz
(2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 34–42. https://doi.org/bzpn9m
(2012). Development and validation of the Job Crafting Scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173–186. https://doi.org/dcz7h6
(2016). Job crafting and its relationships with person-job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 44–53. https://doi.org/gctpsd
(2017). The impact of personal resources and job crafting interventions on work engagement and performance. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/gf39jc
(2015). The consequences of job crafting: A three-wave study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/gf83sn
(2016). How job crafting relates to task performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(3), 672–685. https://doi.org/f8m5hs
(2012).
(Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling . In R. H. HoyleEd., Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). The Guilford Press.in press). Remoteness as a resource: The impact of virtual work on job crafting.
(2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/d26v33
(2013).
(Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work . In A. B. BakkerEd., Advances in positive organizational psychologie (Vol. 1, pp. 281–302). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/gf84tx2021). Does an overall job crafting dimension exist? A multidimensional item response theory analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000638
(2019). Reorienting job crafting research: A hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/gfgvsb
(