Assessing Cognitive Interference Using the Emotional Stroop Task in Students with and Without Attention Problems
Abstract
The present study describes the Emotional Stroop Task as a means to assess cognitive interference triggered by emotional stimuli in elementary school students with and without attention problems. Using the Emotional Stroop Task in a computerized environment and employing samples of students with and without attention problems (111 without and 29 with attention problems), results indicated that prolonged latencies to stimuli with heavy emotional content related to their school experiences were predictive of students’ membership, after controlling for their gender and grade levels. These effects were independent of students’ processing ability as indicated by the lack of significant differences in reaction time to neutral stimuli. It is concluded that the Emotional Stroop Task can be used to assess cognitive interference in emotionally charged conditions across groups of students.
References
(2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 323–338.
(2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445.
(1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 5–28.
(1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.
(2006). Processing of pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral words in a lateralized Emotional Stroop task. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 866–877.
(1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1–16.
(1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(2002). Parent-, teacher-, and self-rated motivational styles in ADHD subtypes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 104–113.
(2005). Effects of mood on students’ metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction, 15, 415–431.
(2007). Perceived learning environment and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17, 478–493.
(1989). The prefrontal cortex. New York: Raven.
(2002). Genov modified Stroop Task (GSMT) [computer software and manual]. Retrieved 7 Sept 2005 from facpub.stjohns.edu/~booner/GMST site/index. htm
(2006). The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 5–29.
(2006). A hierarchical conceptualization of enjoyment in students. Learning and Instruction, 16, 323–338.
(2006). Academic emotions from a sociocognitive perspective: Antecedents and domain specificity of students’ affect in the context of Latin instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 289–308.
(2005). Retrieval-induced forgetting is inversely related to everyday cognitive failures. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 313–319.
(2001). Special section: ADHD comorbidity and treatment outcomes in the MTA. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 134–179.
(2005). Greek scale for the assessment of ADHD (in Greek). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
(2008). Optimism, self-efficacy, and information processing of threat- and well-being-related stimuli. Stress and Health, 23, 285–294.
(2008). Health-related information processing and recent health problems: Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 28–38.
(2003). Relationships of distinct affective dimensions to performance on an emotional Stroop task. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 671–680.
(1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(1997). Further evidence of dimensionality and correlates of the cognitive failures questionnaire. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 29–38.
(1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 123–146.
(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
(1992). Anxiety and the selective processing of emotional information: Mediating roles of awareness, trait and state variables, and personal relevance of stimulus materials. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 30, 479–491.
(2007). Priming the trait category “hostility”: The moderating role of trait anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 577–595.
(1990). Multiple factors of cognitive failure and their relationships with stress vulnerability. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 12, 49–65.
(1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25–50.
(2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 382–392.
(2005). Attentional bias in generalized anxiety disorder versus depressive disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 29–45.
(2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event and interval contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771–785.
(1981). Categorization of actions slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.
(2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583–597.
(1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 51–87.
(2007). The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 184–199.
(1992). Dimensions of everyday memory in young adulthood. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 305–321.
(2007). Reading ability is negatively related to Stroop interference. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 251–282.
(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2004). An introductory primer on multilevel and hierarchical linear modeling. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2, 30–38.
(1997). “Oops”!: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.
(1982). Research on achievement motivation with learning disabled populations. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 1, 75–116.
(2003). The Stroop color-word interference test as an indicator of ADHD in poor readers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 319–333.
(2003). On the origins of helpless behavior in students with learning disabilities: Avoidance motivation?. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 497–517.
(2007). Why are students with learning disabilities depressed? A goal orientation model of depression vulnerability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 526–539.
(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
(1998). Students’ reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 758–771.
(2005). The Stroop task revisited: A meta-analysis of interference control in AD/HD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 150–165.
(2005). Dissociation, cognitive failures, and working memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 118, 103–113.
