Information-Gathering Strategies in Behavioral Assessment
Abstract
Summary: In behavioral assessment, the strategy theoretically most coherent for case formulation is to carry out a functional analysis aimed at discovering, among other factors, functionally relevant stimuli acting upon the problem-behavior. However, little is known about the decision-making processes involved in this task. Although many authors have suggested prescriptive models for this process, the strategies used by clinicians when gathering information seem to be left to experience and common sense. The present research is an attempt to increase the knowledge about this process of information gathering. The study was carried out with psychology students in their final year who already had enough theoretical knowledge to gather this kind of information, but still lacked practical experience. Subjects were asked to gather information aimed at checking a hypothesis about the functional role on a given behavior of either an antecedent or a subsequent (i.e., reinforcing) stimulus. The results show that information gathered to test a reinforcing stimulus hypothesis is more homogeneous than information to test a hypothesis about a functionally relevant antecedent stimulus. The strategies used to test both types of hypotheses are different. In both instances, however, subjects more frequently gathered information useful to refute or refine the hypothesis than information useful to verify it.
References
Adarraga, P. Zaccagnini, J.L. (1992). DAI: A knowledge-based system for diagnosing autism. A case study on the application of artificial intelligence to psychology.. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 25– 46Berrios, G.E. Chen, E.Y.H. (1993). Recognising psychiatric symptoms. Relevance to the diagnostic process.. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 308– 314Boshuizen, H.P. Schmidt, H.G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices.. Cognitive Science, 16, 153– 184De Bruyn, E.E.J. (1992). A normative-prescriptive view on clinical psychodiagnostic decision making.. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 163– 171Dowie, J. Elstein, A. (1988). Professional judgment. A reader in clinical decision making. . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Eells, T.D. (1997). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation. . New York: Guilford.Elstein, A.S. Shulman, L.E., Sprafka, S.A. (1978). Medical problem solving: An analysis of clinical reasoning. . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Evans, I.M. (1993). Dynamic response relationships: The challenge for behavioral assessment.. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 206– 212Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. (1993). Behavioral assessment: Dying, vanishing or still running?. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 159– 174Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. De Bruyn, E.E.J. Godoy, A. Hornke, L.F. Ter Laak, J. Vizcarro, C. Westhoff, K. Westmeyer, H., Zaccagnini, J.L. (2001). Guidelines for the assessment process (GAP): A proposal for discussion.. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 178– 191Godoy, A. (1996). Toma de decisiones y juicio clinico ‘Clinical judgment and decision making’.. Madrid, Spain: Piramide.Godoy, A. (2001). Conocimientos clinicos y proceso de evaluacion ‘Clinical knowledge and process of assessment’.. Escritos de Psicologia, 5, 1– 20Hayes, S.C. Nelson, R.O., Jarrets, R.B. (1986). Evaluation of the quality of behavioral assessment.. In R.O. Nelson & S.C. Hayes (Eds.), Conceptual foundations of behavioral assessment (p.463-503). New York: Guilford.Haynes, S.N. (1998). The assessment-treatment relationship and functional analysis in behavior therapy.. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 26– 35Haynes, S.N. O' Brien, W.H. (2000). Principles and practice of behavioral assessment. . New York: Kluwer /Plenum.Haynes, S.N. Uchigakiuchi, P. Meyer, K. Orimoto, L. Blaine, D., O'Brien, W.H. (1993). Functional analytic causal models and the design of treatment programs: Concepts and clinical applications with childhood behavior problems.. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 189– 205Klayman, J. Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.. Psychological Review, 94, 211– 228Lemieux, M. Bordage, G. (1992). Propositional versus structural semantic analysis of medical diagnostic thinking.. Cognitive Science, 16, 185– 204Patel, V.L. Groen, G.J. (1986). Knowledge-based solution strategies in medical reasoning.. Cognitive Science, 10, 91– 115Popper, K.R. (1972). Objective knowledge. . Oxford: Clarendon.Schulte, D. (1989). Clinical diagnoses and treatment planning.. Evaluacion Psicologica, 5, 135– 146Silva, F. (1993). Psychometric foundations and behavioral assessment. . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Vervaeke, G.A.C. Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (1998). Treatment selection: What do we know?. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 50– 59Weerasekera, P. (1996). Multiperspective case formulation: A step towards treatment integration. . Malabar, FL: Krieger.Westmeyer, H. (2001). Evaluacion y psicoterapia ‘Assessment and psychotherapy’.. Valencia, Spain: Promolibro.
