Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0044-3409.214.4.196

Zusammenfassung. Der kompetente Umgang mit Schriftsprache erfordert eine zeitlich flexible Verteilung attentionaler Ressourcen. Wir untersuchten Aspekte zeitlicher Aufmerksamkeit bei 29 Kindern der fünften und sechsten Schulklasse. Aufgabe der Schüler war es, zwei grün dargestellte Zielwörter innerhalb einer schnellen Serie von weißen Distraktorwörtern zu identifizieren. Es zeigte sich, dass eine größere temporale Aufmerksamkeitskapazität für Zielreize mit einem höheren Lesetempo im Zürcher Lesetest und einer besseren Rechtschreibleistung in der Hamburger Schreib-Probe einherging. Eine höhere Geschwindigkeit beim Vorlesen sinnarmer Pseudowörter war dagegen mit einer stärkeren durch einen intermittierenden Störreiz bedingten Leistungseinbuße assoziiert. Keiner der untersuchten Aufmerksamkeitsparameter erzielte einen signifikanten Zusammenhang mit der nonverbalen Performanz im Hamburg-Wechsler-Mosaik-Test. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass das Lesen und Schreiben vertrauten Wortmaterials mehr von einer effizienten Aufmerksamkeitszuweisung auf Zielreize als vom Ausblenden aufgabenirrelevanter Items profitiert. Umgekehrt profitieren primär regelgestützte, kontrollierte Prozesse, wie sie beim Pseudowörter-Lesen erforderlich sind, stärker von der Fokussierung auf einen ersten Zielreiz zu Lasten nachfolgender Ereignisse.


The relationship between temporal attention and literacy skills in classroom children

Abstract. Literacy skills have been linked to temporal shifts of attention. We set out to examine the parameters of temporal attention in 29 classroom children aged 10 to 13 years. Children identified two green target words amidst a stream of white distractor words. Higher attentional capacity for rapidly presented targets was related to faster reading and superior spelling accuracy as measured by age-appropriate language tests. Faster decoding of arbitrary pseudowords, however, was associated with greater sensitivity to interference induced by intervening distractors. There was no significant relationship between the attentional parameters and the performance in the nonverbal Wechsler Block Design test. Our results suggest that reading and spelling familiar items benefit primarily from efficient attentional allocation to targets, but to a lesser extent from ignoring task-irrelevant stimuli. Conversely, controlled, rule-based processing of pseudowords benefits to a higher degree from focusing resources on a first stimulus, at the cost of processing subsequent events.

References

  • Amitay, S. , Ben-Yehudah, G. , Banai, K. , Ahissar, M. (2002). Disabled readers suffer from visual and auditory impairments but not from a specific magnocellular deficit. Brain , 125, 10 2272– 2285 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, A. K. , Phelps, E. A. (2001). Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature , 411, 6835 305– 309 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baayen, R. H. , Piepenbrock, R. , Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Biscaldi, M. , Fischer, B. , Hartnegg, K. (2000). Voluntary saccadic control in dyslexia. Perception , 29, 5 509– 521 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Breier, J. I. , Gray, L. , Fletcher, J. M. , Diehl, R. L. , Klaas, P. , Foorman, B. R. , Molis, M. R. (2001). Perception of voice and tone onset time continua in children with dyslexia with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 80, 3 245– 270 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Casco, C. , Tressoldi, P. E. , Dellantonio, A. (1998). Visual selective attention and reading efficiency are related in children. Cortex , 34, 4 531– 546 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chun, M. M. , Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 21, 1 109– 127 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deimann, P. , Kastner-Koller, U. (2003). Testbesprechung: HAWIK-III. Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder - Dritte Auflage. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie , 35, 3 181– 184 . First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Di Lollo, V. , Kawahara, J. , Shahab Ghorashi, S. M. , Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control?. Psychological Research , 69, 3 191– 200 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Facoetti, A. , Lorusso, M. L. , Paganoni, P. , Cattaneo, C. , Galli, R. , Mascetti, G. G. (2003). The time course of attentional focusing in dyslexic and normally reading children. Brain and Cognition , 53, 2 181– 184 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grissemann, H. (2000). Zürcher Lesetest, ZLT (6. Aufl. mit neuer deutscher Rechtschreibung). Bern: Huber . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hari, R. , Renvall, H. (2001). Impaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 5, 12 525– 532 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hari, R. , Valta, M. , Uutela, K. (1999). Prolonged attentional dwell time in dyslexic adults. Neuroscience Letters , 271, 3 202– 204 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heim, S. , Benasich, A. A. (2006). Developmental disorders of language. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation, Vol. 3 (2nd. ed., pp. 268-316). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heim, S. , Eulitz, C. , Keil, A. , Rockstroh, B. , Elbert, T. (2003). Interventionseffekte auf phonologische Verarbeitung und kortikale Organisation bei Kindern mit spezifischer Sprachbeeinträchtigung. In G. Schiepek (Hrsg.), Neurobiologie der Psychotherapie (S. 273-292). Stuttgart: Schattauer . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heim, S. , Freeman, R. B., Jr. , Eulitz, C. , Elbert, T. (2001). Auditory temporal processing deficit in dyslexia is associated with enhanced sensitivity in the visual modality. Neuroreport , 12, 3 507– 510 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heim, S. , Keil, A. , Ruf, M. (2006). Cross-modal temporal dysfunction in children with dyslexia: Is age a mediating factor?. In C. B. Hayes (Ed.), Dyslexia in children: New research (pp. 65-78). New York: Nova Science Publishers . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heller, K. A. , Kratzmeier, H. , Lengfelder, A. (1998). Raven-Matrizen-Test, Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) . Göttingen: Beltz . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hommel, B. , Kessler, K. , Schmitz, F. , Gross, J. , Akyürek, E. , Shapiro, K. , Schnitzler, A. (2005). How the brain blinks: Towards a neurocognitive model of the attentional blink. Psychological Research , DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0009-3 . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Imai, M. , Anderson, R. C. , Wilkinson, I. A. , Yi, H. (1992). Properties of attention during reading lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology , 84, 2 160– 173 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jolicoeur, P. , Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology , 36, 2 138– 202 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keil, A. , Ihssen, N. (2004). Identification facilitation for emotionally arousing verbs during the attentional blink. Emotion , 4, 1 23– 35 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keil, A. , Ihssen, N. , Heim, S. (2006). Early cortical facilitation for emotionally arousing targets during the attentional blink. BMC Biology , 4, 23– First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kinsey, K. , Rose, M. , Hansen, P. , Richardson, A. , Stein, J. (2004). Magnocellular mediated visual-spatial attention and reading ability. Neuroreport , 15, 14 2215– 2218 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klicpera, C. , Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (1993). Lesen und Schreiben - Entwicklung und Schwierigkeiten . Bern: Huber . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kliegl, R. , Nuthmann, A. , Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 135, 1 12– 35 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lacroix, G. L. , Constantinescu, I. , Cousineau, D. , de Almeida, R. G. , Segalowitz, N. , von Grünau, M. (2005). Attentional blink differences between adolescent dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Cognition , 57, 2 115– 119 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lahaderne, H. M. (1968). Attitudinal and intellectual correlates of attention: A study of four sixth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology , 59, 5 320– 324 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • May, P. (2002). Hamburger Schreib-Probe für die Klassen 5 bis 9, HSP 5-9 B . Hamburg: verlag für pädagogische medien (vpm) . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mohr, B. , Heim, S. , Pulvermüller, F. , Rockstroh, B. (2001). Functional asymmetry in schizophrenic patients during auditory speech processing. Schizophrenia Research , 52, 1-2 69– 78 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction?. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , 13, 2 212– 218 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raymond, J. E. , Shapiro, K. L. , Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 18, 3 849– 860 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosen, S. , Manganari, E. (2001). Is there a relationship between speech and nonspeech auditory processing in children with dyslexia?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 44, 4 720– 736 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Samuels, S. J. , Turnure, J. E. (1974). Attention and reading achievement in first-grade boys and girls. Journal of Educational Psychology , 66, 1 29– 32 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shapiro, K. L. , Raymond, J. E. , Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 20, 2 357– 371 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shapiro, K. L. , Schmitz, F. , Martens, S. , Hommel, B. , Schnitzler, A. (2006). Resource sharing in the attentional blink. Neuroreport , 17, 2 163– 166 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Slaghuis, W. L. , Ryan, J. F. (1999). Spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity, coherent motion, and visible persistence in developmental dyslexia. Vision Research , 39, 3 651– 668 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sowell, E. R. , Trauner, D. A. , Gamst, A. , Jernigan, T. L. (2002). Development of cortical and subcortical brain structures in childhood and adolescence: A structural MRI study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology , 44, 1 4– 16 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strutt, G. F. , Anderson, D. R. , Well, A. D. (1975). A developmental study of the effects of irrelevant information on speeded classification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 20, 1 127– 135 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Talcott, J. B. , Hansen, P. C. , Assoku, E. L. , Stein, J. F. (2000). Visual motion sensitivity in dyslexia: Evidence for temporal and energy integration deficits. Neuropsychologia , 38, 7 935– 943 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language , 9, 2 182– 198 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tallal, P. (1984). Temporal or phonetic processing deficit in dyslexia? That is the question. Applied Psycholinguistics , 5, 2 167– 169 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tallal, P. (2004). Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , 5, 9 721– 728 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tewes, U. , Rossmann, P. , Schallberger, U. (Hrsg.) (1999). Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder - Dritte Version, HAWIK-III (1. Aufl.). Bern: Huber . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Ingelghem, M. , van Wieringen, A. , Wouters, J. , Vandenbussche, E. , Onghena, P. , Ghesquière, P. (2001). Psychophysical evidence for a general temporal processing deficit in children with dyslexia. Neuroreport , 12, 16 3603– 3607 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vidyasagar, T. R. (2004). Neural underpinnings of dyslexia as a disorder of visuo-spatial attention. Clinical and Experimental Optometry , 87, 1 4– 10 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Visser, T. A. , Bischof, W. F. , Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin , 125, 4 458– 469 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Visser, T. A. , Boden, C. , Giaschi, D. E. (2004). Children with dyslexia: Evidence for visual attention deficits in perception of rapid sequences of objects. Vision Research , 44, 21 2521– 2535 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics , 14, 1 1– 33 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H. , Mayringer, H. , Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology , 92, 4 668– 680 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Witton, C. , Stein, J. F. , Stoodley, C. J. , Rosner, B. S. , Talcott, J. B. (2002). Separate influences of acoustic AM and FM sensitivity on the phonological decoding skills of impaired and normal readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 14, 6 866– 874 . First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar