Abstract
Abstract. The goal of this article was to highlight important issues that have to be considered when designing an electroencephalography (EEG)-based neurofeedback training for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and to provide practical advice for a successful implementation. Autism is a heterogeneous and complex disorder, which leads to a broad and varied profile of symptoms as well as to huge individual differences between the affected children. This is why the neurofeedback training protocol has to be individually designed based on the specific symptoms as well as in consideration of the existing theories about aberrant brain activity, and why it then needs to be evaluated empirically. Furthermore, neurofeedback training has to be optimized individually regarding the specific control signal, feedback and practical implementations in order to lead to the desired improvements.
Zusammenfassung. Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, auf die Herausforderungen eines Elektroenzephalographie (EEG)-basierten Neurofeedback Trainings für Kinder mit einer Autismus-Spektrum-Störung aufmerksam zu machen und praktische Tipps für eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung zu geben. Autismus ist eine komplexe und heterogene Störung. Dies führt zu einer großen Palette an unterschiedlichen Symptomen sowie zu großen individuellen Unterschieden zwischen den betroffenen Kindern. Deshalb sollte das Neurofeedback Training basierend auf den spezifischen Symptomen und in Betracht der Literatur über zugrundeliegende Störungen der Gehirnnetzwerke individuell konzipiert und dann empirisch getestet werden. Zusätzlich sollte das Neurofeedback Training bezüglich des Kontrollsignals, des Feedbacks und der praktischen Implementierung individuell optimiert werden um die gewünschten Verbesserungen zu erzielen.
References
American Psychiatric Association . (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5 (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.105.12.9202011). Functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging classification of autism. Brain, 134 (12), 3739–3751. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr263
(2014). Modulations of mirroring activity by desire for social connection and relevance of movement. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9 (11), 1762–1769. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst172
(2011). μ-Suppression during action observation and execution correlates with BOLD in dorsal Premotor, inferior parietal, and SI cortices. Journal of Neuroscience, 31 (40), 14243–14249. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0963-11.2011
(2007). EEG mu rhythm and imitation impairments in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Brain and Cognition, 64 (3), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.03.004
(2013). Do mirror neuron areas mediate mu rhythm suppression during imitation and action observation? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 89 (1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.019
(2005). Gamma abnormalities during perception of illusory figures in autism. Cortex, 41 (3), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70273-9
(2008). The brain's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011
(2009). QEEG studies in the assessment and treatment of childhood disorders. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 40 (2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940904000209
(2014). Embodied Cognition and Mirror Neurons: A Critical Assessment. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013950
(2015). Understanding intentions from actions: Direct perception, inference, and the roles of mirror and mentalizing systems. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.012
(2008). Gender differences in the mu rhythm of the human mirror-neuron system. PLoS ONE, 3 (5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002113
(2008). The perception of pain in others suppresses somatosensory oscillations: A magnetoencephalography study. NeuroImage, 40 (4), 1833–1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.064
(2008). EEG power and coherence in autistic spectrum disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119 (5), 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.013
(2010). Neurofeedback for autistic spectrum disorder: A review of the literature. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 35 (1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9117-y
(2010). The relative efficacy of connectivity guided and symptom based EEG biofeedback for autistic disorders. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 35 (1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9102-5
(2007). Assessment-Guided neurofeedback for Autistic Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Neurotherapy, 11 (1), 5–22.
(2019).
(Using a Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Cortical Connectivity Changes Following Neurofeedback Training in Children on the Autism Spectrum . In L. M. ObermanP. G. Enticott (Eds.), Neurotechnology and Brain Stimulation in Pediatric Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (Vol. 11, pp. 253–276). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2923-12006). Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nature Neuroscience 9 (1), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1611.Understanding
, (2012). A stable pattern of EEG spectral coherence distinguishes children with autism from neuro-typical controls – a large case control study. BMC Medicine, 10 (1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-64
(2013). Interpersonal motor resonance in autism spectrum disorder: Evidence against a global “mirror system” deficit. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7 (MAY), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00218
(2011). Do user-related factors of motor impaired and able-bodied participants correlate with classification accuracy? Proceedings of the 5th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference (2011), 156–159.
(2013). Whatever works: a systematic user-centered training protocol to optimize brain-computer interfacing individually. PloS One, 8 (9), e76214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076214
(2015). An Effective Neurofeedback Intervention to Improve Social Interactions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45 (12), 4084–4100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2523-5
(2014). Brain-computer interface game applications for combined neurofeedback and biofeedback treatment for children on the autism spectrum. Frontiers in Neuroengineering, 7 (JUL), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00021
(2015). Mind Over Brain, Brain Over Mind: Cognitive Causes and Consequences of Controlling Brain Activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (348) https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88919-663-0
(2006). The Neural Basis of Mentalizing. Neuron, 50 (4), 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001
(2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (9), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002
(2019). Altered resting-state dynamics in autism spectrum disorder: Causal to the social impairment? Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 90 (November 2018), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp. 2018.11.002
(2006). Anatomical differences in the mirror neuron system and social cognition network in autism. Cerebral Cortex, 16 (9), 1276-1282. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj069
(2013).
(Two systems for action comprehension in autism: Mirroring and mentalizing . In Baron-CohenTager-FlusbergLombardo (Eds.), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience (pp. 380–396). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/97801996929722009). Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 (7), 1229–1243. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21189.Eight
(2011). Neurofeedback in autism spectrum disorders. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53 (11), 986–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04043.x
(2017). Alpha/Theta Neurofeedback Increases Mentalization and Default Mode Network Connectivity in a Non-Clinical Sample. Brain Topography, 30 (6), 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-017-0593-8
(2002). Efficacy of Neurofeedback for Children in the Autistic Spectrum : A Pilot Study. Journal of Neurotherapy, 6, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J184v06n04_05
(2004). Cortical activation and synchronization during sentence comprehension in high-functioning autism: Evidence of underconnectivity. Brain, 127 (8), 1811–1821. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh199
(2012). Autism as a neural systems disorder. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36 (4), 1292–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.007.Autism
(2011). The role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in social perception: An rTMS study. Brain Research, 1383, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.073
(2008). fMRI Investigation of Working Memory for Faces in Autism: Visual Coding and Underconnectivity with Frontal Areas. Cerebal Cortex, 18 (2), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm054.fMRI
(2009). Long-term effects of neurofeedback treatment in autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3 (2), 496–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2008.10.003
(2009). Neurofeedback improves executive functioning in children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3 (1), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2008.05.001
(2010). Neurofeedback treatment in autism. Preliminary findings in behavioral, cognitive, and neurophysiological functioning. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 4 (3), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2009.10.007
(1978). EEG feedback training: Enhancement of somatosensory cortical activity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 45 (2), 290–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(78)90014-7
(2018). Facilitating Neurofeedback in Children with Autism and Intellectual Impairments Using TAGteach. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48 (6), 2090–2100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3466-4
(2016). Methodological note: Neurofeedback: A comprehensive review on system design, methodology and clinical applications. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 7 (2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.15412/j.bcn.03070208
(2012). Social working memory: Neurocognitive networks and directions for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 3 (DEC), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00571
(2006). Developmental dyspraxia is not limited to imitation in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12 (3), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617706060437
(2007). Resting state cortical connectivity reflected in EEG coherence in individuals with autism. Biological Psychiatry, 62 (3), 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.012
(2004). Changes in rolandic mu rhythm during observation of a precision grip. Psychophysiology, 41 (1), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00129.x
(2004). Mu rhythm modulation during observation of an object-directed grasp. Cognitive Brain Research, 19 (2), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.001
(2009). Motor imagery and action observation: modulation of sensorimotor brain rhythms during mental control of a brain-computer interface. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120 (2), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.015
(2004). Abnormal Imitation-Related Cortical Activation Sequences in Asperger's Syndrome. Annals of Neurology, 55 (4), 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20031
(1970). The control of electroencephalographic alpha rhythms through auditory feedback and the associated mental activity. Psychophysiology, 6 (4), 476–484.
(2005). EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cognitive Brain Research, 24 (2), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.014
(2007). The human mirror neuron system: A link between action observation and social skills. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2 (1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl022
(2007). The simulating social mind: The role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 133 (2), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.310
(2008). Modulation of mu suppression in children with autism spectrum disorders in response to familiar or unfamiliar stimuli: The mirror neuron hypothesis. Neuropsychologia, 46 (5), 1558–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.010
(2017). Assessing the effectiveness of neurofeedback training in the context of clinical and social neuroscience. Brain Sciences, 7 (8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7080095
(2010). Intranasal oxytocin modulates EEG mu/alpha and beta rhythms during perception of biological motion. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35 (10), 1446–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.04.011
(2008). Positive behavioral and electrophysiological changes following neurofeedback training in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2 (3), 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2007.12.003
(2009). Mirroring and mu rhythm involvement in social cognition: Are there dissociable subcomponents of theory of mind? Biological Psychology, 80 (3), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.11.003
(2000). The effects of self-movement, observation, and imagination on mu rhythms and readiness potentials (RP's): Toward a brain-computer interface (BCI). IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 8 (2), 219–222.
(2005). The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing.” Brain Research Reviews, 50 (1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005
(2014). Neurofeedback training produces normalization in behavioural and electrophysiological measures of high-functioning autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130183. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0183
(2014). Neurorehabilitation of social dysfunctions: a model-based neurofeedback approach for low and high-functioning autism. Frontiers in Neuroengineering, 7 (August), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00029
(2009). EEG study of the mirror neuron system in children with high functioning autism. Brain Research, 1304, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.068
(2004). The Mirror-Neuron System.Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27 (1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
(2008). Minds at rest? Social cognition as the default mode of cognizing and its putative relationship to the “default system” of the brain. Consciousness and Cognition, 17 (2), 457–467.
(2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009
(2014). Functional activity and effective connectivity of the posterior medial prefrontal cortex during processing of incongruent mental states. Human Brain Mapping, 35 (7), 2950–2965. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22377
(2012). Detection of abnormalities for diagnosing of children with autism disorders using of quantitative electroencephalography analysis. Journal of Medical Systems, 36 (2), 957–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-010-9560-6
(2009). The Common Neural Basis of Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, Naviation, Theory of Mind an the Default Mode: A Quantitative Meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 (3), 489–510. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21029
(2013). The Busy Social Brain: Evidence for Automaticity and Control in the Neural Systems Supporting Social Cognition and Action Understanding. Psychological Science, 24 (1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612450884
(2011). Identifying the what, why, and how of an observed action: An fMRI study of mentalizing and mechanizing during action observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 (1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21446
(2011). Exploring the relationship between gestural recognition and imitation: Evidence of dyspraxia in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1011-1
(2005). Impaired motor facilitation during action observation in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Current Biology, 15 (3), 84–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.022
(2010a). Functional neuroanatomy and the rationale for using EEG biofeedback for clients with Asperger's syndrome. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 35 (1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9095-0
(2010b). Neurofeedback outcomes in clients with Asperger's Syndrome. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 35 (1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9120-3
(2014). Imagining triadic interactions simultaneously activates mirror and mentalizing systems. NeuroImage, 98, 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.003
(2009). Mirror neurons in humans: Consisting or confounding evidence? Brain and Language, 108 (1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.002
(2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30 (3), 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20547
(2005). Reduced functional connectivity between V1 and inferior frontal cortex associated with visuomotor performance in autism. NeuroImage, 25 (3), 916–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.022
(2001). Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage, 14 (1 I), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0789
(2012). Social top-down response modulation (STORM): a model of the control of mimicry in social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6 (June), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00153
(2005). Functional disconnectivity of the medial temporal lobe in Asperger's syndrome. Biological Psychiatry, 57 (9), 991–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.028
(2002). Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113 (6), 767–791.
(Eds.). (2015). Biological Basis of Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Academic Press.
(