Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-68sx7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:11:31.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the dimension of planar self-affine sets with non-invertible maps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2023

Balázs Bárány
Affiliation:
Department of Stochastics, Institute of Mathematics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Muűegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary (balubsheep@gmail.com, vkortvelyesi@gmail.com)
Viktor Körtvélyesi
Affiliation:
Department of Stochastics, Institute of Mathematics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Muűegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary (balubsheep@gmail.com, vkortvelyesi@gmail.com)

Abstract

In this paper, we study the dimension of planar self-affine sets, of which generating iterated function system (IFS) contains non-invertible affine mappings. We show that under a certain separation condition the dimension equals to the affinity dimension for a typical choice of the linear-parts of the non-invertible mappings, furthermore, we show that the dimension is strictly smaller than the affinity dimension for certain choices of parameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bárány, B.. On the Hausdorff dimension of a family of self-similar sets with complicated overlaps. Fund. Math. 206 (2009), 4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, B., Hochman, M. and Rapaport, A.. Hausdorff dimension of planar self-affine sets and measures. Invent. Math. 216 (2019), 601659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, B., Käenmäki, A. and Koivusalo, H.. Dimension of self-affine sets for fixed translation vectors. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 98 (2018), 223252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K. and Kempton, T.. Planar self-affine sets with equal Hausdorff, box and affinity dimensions. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Syst. 38 (2018), 13691388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K. J.. The Hausdorff dimension of self-affine fractals. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 103 (1988), 339350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K. J., Fractal geometry. Mathematical Foundations and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D.-J.. Lyapunov exponents for products of matrices and multifractal analysis. II. General matrices. Israel J. Math. 170 (2009), 355394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D.-J. and Käenmäki, A.. Equilibrium states of the pressure function for products of matrices. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 30 (2011), 699708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochman, M.. On self-similar sets with overlaps and inverse theorems for entropy. Ann. of Math. (2) 180 (2014), 773822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochman, M., On self-similar sets with overlaps and inverse theorems for entropy in $\mathbb {R}^d$. preprint, arXiv:1503.09043 (2015).Google Scholar
Hochman, M. and Rapaport, A.. Hausdorff dimension of planar self-affine sets and measures with overlaps. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 24 (2022), 23612441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, J. E.. Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), 713747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Käenmäki, A. and Nissinen, P., Non-invertible planar self-affine sets. preprint arXiv:2205.07351 (2022).Google Scholar
Mattila, P., Geometry of sets and measures in Euclidean spaces, volume 44 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995). Fractals and rectifiability.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapaport, A.. On self-affine measures with equal Hausdorff and Lyapunov dimensions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370 (2018), 47594783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, K. and Solomyak, B.. On the dimension of self-similar sets. Fractals 10 (2002), 5965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomyak, B.. Measure and dimension for some fractal families. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 124 (1998), 531546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar