Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T02:06:27.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local Gambling Culture and Enterprise Bribery: A Social Norms Theory Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2024

Xi Zhong ,
Can Huang  and
Ge Ren
Xi Zhong
Affiliation:
School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Can Huang*
Affiliation:
School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Ge Ren
Affiliation:
School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Can Huang (huangcan@gdut.edu.cn)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on social norms theory, we examine the impact of local gambling culture, an unexpected result of government-permitted lotteries, on enterprise bribery. We propose that local gambling cultures can promote active enterprise involvement in bribery activities by reinforcing the speculative psychology of enterprise decision-makers. In addition, we argue that local gambling culture is less likely to lead female (returnee) chairpersons to develop speculative psychology than male (nonreturnee) chairpersons. This, in turn, allows female (returnee) chairpersons to undermine the positive impact of local gambling culture on involvement in enterprise bribery. Based on 11 years of empirical data obtained from privately listed Chinese companies (including 2,637 listed companies with 15,036 firm-year data points), we obtain empirical evidence to support most of these views. This study is the first to explore the relationship between local gambling culture and enterprise bribery, and important insights are provided for shareholders and policy-makers to better curb enterprise bribery.

摘要

摘要

本文采用社会规范理论来研究地方赌博文化对企业贿赂的影响。地方赌博文化常常是政府允许的彩票活动的意外产物。我们提出，地方赌博文化可能会诱导企业决策者的投机心理，从而促使企业参与贿赂活动。但这种效应存在性别差异，男性（非海归）董事长比女 性（海归）董事长更可能产生投机心理。也就是说，女性（海归）任董事长的企业更不可能受当地赌博文化的影响而去贿赂。本文分析了中国民营上市公司的 11 年实证数据（包括 2,637 家上市公司的 15,036 个公司-年份数据），发现上述大部分假设都得到了支持。本研究首次探讨了地方赌博文化 与企业贿赂之间的关系，为股东和政策制定者更好地遏制企业贿赂提供了重要启示。

Keywords

enterprise briberyfemale chairpersonlocal gambling culturereturneesocial norms当地赌博文化企业贿赂女性董事长海归社会规范
Type
Article
Information
Management and Organization Review , First View , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adhikari, B. K., & Agrawal, A. 2016. Religion, gambling attitudes and corporate innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 37(4): 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alharbi, S., Atawnah, N., Al Mamun, M., & Ali, M. J. 2022. Local culture and tax avoidance: Evidence from gambling preference behavior. Global Finance Journal, 52(5): 100585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alharbi, S. S., Atawnah, N., Ali, M. J., & Eshraghi, A. 2023. Gambling culture and earnings management: A novel perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance, 86(7): 520–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alon, A., & Hageman, A. M. 2017. An institutional perspective on corruption in transition economies. Corporate Governance : An International Review, 25(3): 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beber, A., & Fabbri, D. 2012. Who times the foreign exchange market? Corporate speculation and CEO characteristics. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(5): 1065–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blay, A. D., Gooden, E. S., Mellon, M. J., & Stevens, D. E. 2018. The usefulness of social norm theory in empirical business ethics research: A review and suggestions for future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1): 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, H., Fang, H., & Xu, L. C. 2011. Eat, drink, firms, government: An investigation of corruption from the entertainment and travel costs of Chinese firms. Journal of Law and Economics, 54(1): 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callen, J. L., & Fang, X. 2020. Local gambling norms and audit pricing. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(1): 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadee, D., Roxas, B., & Kouznetsov, A. 2021. Corruption, bribery and innovation in CEE: Where is the link? Journal of Business Ethics, 174(4): 747–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantziaras, A., Dedoulis, E., Grougiou, V., & Leventis, S. 2020. The impact of religiosity and corruption on CSR reporting: The case of U.S. Banks. Journal of Business Research, 109(3): 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Podolski, E. J., Rhee, S. G., & Veeraraghavan, M. 2014. Local gambling preferences and corporate innovative success. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(1): 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, D. M., Jones, K. L., & Kenchington, D. G. 2018. Gambling attitudes and financial misreporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(3): 1229–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieślik, A., & Goczek, Ł. 2022. Who suffers and how much from corruption? Evidence from firm-level data. Eurasian Business Review, 12(3): 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Shi, W., & Zyung, J. 2017. Managerial response to constitutional constraints on shareholder power. Strategic Management Journal, 38(7): 1499–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2008. The effectiveness of laws against bribery abroad. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 634–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czibor, A., Szabo, Z. P., Jones, D. N., Zsido, A. N., Paal, T., Szijjarto, L., Carre, J. R., & Bereczkei, T. 2017. Male and female face of Machiavellianism: Opportunism or anxiety? Personality and Individual Differences, 117(1): 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doukas, J. A., & Zhang, W. 2013. Managerial gambling attitudes in U.S. banking acquisitions. Review of Behavioral Finance, 5(1): 4–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddleston, K. A., Banalieva, E. R., & Verbeke, A. 2020. The bribery paradox in transition economies and the enactment of ‘new normal’ business environments. Journal of Management Studies, 57(3): 597–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwood, S., & Garcia-Lacalle, J. 2015. The influence of presence and position of women on the boards of directors: The case of NHS foundation trusts. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. The Journal of Political Economy, 81(3): 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J., Tao, Z., Oehmichen, J., & Van Ees, H. 2023. CEO career horizon and corporate bribery: A strategic relationship perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, doi: 10.1007/s10490-022-09868-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghorbani, M., Xie, Z., Jin, J., & Wang, F. 2023. Chinese firms’ acquisition of innovation capability from overseas: Approaches by state- versus private-owned firms. Management and Organization Review, 19(2): 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godinez, J., & Liu, L. 2018. Corruption and its effects on FDI: Analysing the interaction between the corruption levels of the home and host countries and its effects at the decision-making level. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4): 705–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. 2006. Does culture affect economic outcomes? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2): 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Q., Jennings, J. E., Liu, R., & Jennings, P. D. 2019. Going home and helping out? Returnees as propagators of CSR in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(6): 857–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, H., Lian, Y., & Zhou, W. 2019. Do local protestant values affect corporate cash holdings? Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1): 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C., & Ho, K. 2023. Does the presence of executives with a legal background affect stock price crash risk? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(1): 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, N. M., Li, Q., & Rahman, A. 2010. Understanding corruption and firm responses in cross-national firm-level surveys. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9): 1481–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, Q., Quan, X., Yin, H., & Yuan, Q. 2021. Gambling preferences and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 128(7): 106158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, F., Shi, W., & Zheng, X. 2020. Board chairs and R&D investment: Evidence from Chinese family-controlled firms. Journal of Business Research, 112(5): 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, S., & Min, Y. 2022. The ability and willingness of family firms to bribe: A socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(1): 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, C., Germann, F., & Grewal, R. 2016. Washing away your sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility, and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 80(2): 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keig, D. L., Brouthers, L. E., & Marshall, V. B. 2015. Formal and informal corruption environments and multinational enterprise social irresponsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 52(1): 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krammer, S. 2019. Greasing the wheels of change: Bribery, institutions, and new product introductions in emerging markets. Journal of Management, 45(5): 1889–1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latvala, T., Castrén, S., Alho, H., & Salonen, A. 2018. Compulsory school achievement and gambling among men and women aged 18–29 in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 46(5): 505–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J. M., Paik, Y., Vance, C., Li, D., & Groves, K. 2022. The evolution of business ethics in China and the United States: Convergence, divergence, or crossvergence? Management and Organization Review, 18(4): 658–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S., Oh, K., & Eden, L. 2010. Why do firms bribe? Insights from residual control theory into firms’ exposure and vulnerability to corruption. Management International Review, 50(6): 775–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S., Pantzalis, C., & Park, J. C. 2019. Does local culture trigger speculative investment behavior? Journal of Business Research, 103(10): 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, W., & Guven, C. 2013. Engaging in corruption: The influence of cultural values and contagion effects at the microlevel. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39(12): 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, A. 2022. Preemptive or promotive: The differential impact of strategic leaders’ political connections on firm long-term investment in China. Long Range Planning, 55(3): 102158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J., Choi, S., Jiménez, A., & Bayraktar, S. 2023. Bribery in emerging economies: An integration of institutional and non-market position perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(1): 205–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. 2010. Why “good” firms do bad things: the effects of high aspirations, high expectations and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4): 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T. D. 2020. Does firm growth increase corruption? Evidence from an instrumental variable approach. Small Business Economics, 55(1): 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oster, E. 2019. Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(2): 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieto Ursua, M., & Uribelarrea, L. L. 1998. 20 questions of gamblers anonymous: A psychometric study with population of Spain. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(1): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, X., Wu, Q., Hall, S., & Pauly, P. 2021. Local gambling preferences and bank risk–taking: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 105(2): 105675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, G., Zeng, P., & Zhong, X. 2023. Impact of returnee executives and managerial discretion on excess perquisite consumption. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(2): 498–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, L., Zhong, X., & Wan, L. 2022a. Missing analyst forecasts and corporate fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(1): 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, L., Zhong, X., & Wan, L. 2022b. Defending the shell: Differential effects of delisting pressure on R&D intensity and bribery expenditure. Review of Managerial Science, 16(2): 1437–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivas, M. F. 2013. An experiment on corruption and gender. Bulletin of Economic Research, 65(1): 10–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopohl, L., Urquhart, A., & Zhang, H. 2021. Female CFOs, leverage and the moderating role of board diversity and CEO power. Journal of Corporate Finance (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 71(12): 101858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, A., Zheng, J. D., & Zhuravleva, T. 2022. Corruption: A cross-country comparison of contagion and conformism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 193(1): 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundqvist, K., & Rosendahl, I. 2019. Problem gambling and psychiatric comorbidity – risk and temporal sequencing among women and men: Results from the Swelogs case–control study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(3): 757–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, B., & Fan, Z. 2018. Collusion, rent-seeking and tax evasion. Economic Research Journal (In Chinese), 53(5): 118–131.Google Scholar
Tong, L., Wu, B., & Zhang, M. 2023. Local gambling attitudes and audit quality: Evidence from audit adjustments. Abacus, 59(1): 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, G., Xie, L., Li, J., & Jiang, D. 2022. Entertainment spending and capturing value from innovation in Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 18(4): 623–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, D., Zhou, K. Z., & Du, F. 2019. Deviant versus aspirational risk taking: The effects of performance feedback on bribery expenditure and R&D intensity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4): 1226–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Xu, N., Chan, K. C., & Li, Z. 2021. Generalist vs. Specialist: Who are better acquirers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 67(2): 101915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, J., Teng, D., & Meng, S. 2018. Foreign ownership and bribery: Agency and institutional perspectives. International Business Review, 27(1): 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Zhao, W., & Zhang, Y. 2016. Institutional transformation and changing networking patterns in China. Management and Organization Review, 12(2): 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M., Ma, X., Chen, W., & Lan, H. 2023. Group polarization in board decisions about strategic change: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed companies (2008–2018). Management and Organization Review, 19(2): 201–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Zhou, X., & Lyles, M. A. 2023. Reaching an optimally distinctive CSR strategy: Examining the antecedents of CSR scope conformity and emphasis differentiation among Chinese publicly listed companies. Management and Organization Review, 19(1): 32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, X., Ren, G., & Wu, X. 2022. Corporate philanthropy and bribery as distinctive responses to economic policy uncertainty: Do state-owned and private firms differ? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, doi:10.1007/s10490-022-09866-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, X., Ren, L., & Song, T. 2022. Beyond market strategies: How multiple decision-maker groups jointly influence underperforming firms’ corporate social (ir)responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(2): 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, K. Z., Wang, K., Xu, D., & Xie, E. 2022. Drinking poison to quench thirst: Does bribery foster firm performance in China? Journal of Business Research, 147(8): 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zolotoy, L., O Sullivan, D., & Martin, G. P. 2018. The social context of compensation design: Social norms and the impact of equity incentives. Human Resource Management, 57(5): 1233–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar