No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Challenging assumptions in research and practice using problematization principles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 March 2023
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
References
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188
Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2020). The problematizing review: A counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s argument for integrative reviews. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1290–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12582
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, P. (2023) All we like sheep: The need for reflection and reflexivity in I-O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 16.Google Scholar
Laguerre, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Hughes, J. M. (2022). An examination of the predictive validity of subjective age and core self-evaluations on performance-related outcomes. Work, Aging and Retirement, waab038. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab038
Google Scholar
Punnett, L., Cavallari, J. M., Henning, R. A., Nobrega, S., Dugan, A. G., Cherniack, M. G., & CPH-NEW Research Team. (2020). Defining “integration” for total worker health®: A new proposal. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 64(3),
223–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaa003
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Kunze, F., & Zacher, H. (2019). Getting objective about subjective age: Introduction to a special issue. Work, Aging and Retirement, 5(4), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waz019
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C. W. (2019). Just a mirage: On the incremental predictive validity of subjective Age. Work, Aging and Retirement, 5(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wax031
CrossRefGoogle Scholar