Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:34:05.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relative pressure functions and their equilibrium states

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2022

YUKI YAYAMA*
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciencias Exactas and Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Dinámicos y Aplicaciones (GISDA), Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Avenida Andrés Bello 720, Casilla 447, Chillán, Chile

Abstract

For a subshift $(X, \sigma _{X})$ and a subadditive sequence ${\mathcal F}=\{\log f_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty }$ on X, we study equivalent conditions for the existence of $h\in C(X)$ such that $\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }(1/{n})\int \log f_{n}\, d\kern-1pt\mu =\int h \,d\kern-1pt\mu $ for every invariant measure $\mu $ on X. For this purpose, we first we study necessary and sufficient conditions for ${\mathcal F}$ to be an asymptotically additive sequence in terms of certain properties for periodic points. For a factor map $\pi : X\rightarrow Y$ , where $(X, \sigma _{X})$ is an irreducible shift of finite type and $(Y, \sigma _{Y})$ is a subshift, applying our results and the results obtained by Cuneo [Additive, almost additive and asymptotically additive potential sequences are equivalent. Comm. Math. Phys. 37 (3) (2020), 2579–2595] on asymptotically additive sequences, we study the existence of h with regard to a subadditive sequence associated to a relative pressure function. This leads to a characterization of the existence of a certain type of continuous compensation function for a factor map between subshifts. As an application, we study the projection $\pi \mu $ of an invariant weak Gibbs measure $\mu $ for a continuous function on an irreducible shift of finite type.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonioli, J.. Compensation functions for factors of shifts of finite type. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 36(2) (2016), 375389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreira, L.. Nonadditive thermodynamic formalism: equilibrium and Gibbs measures. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 16(2) (2006), 279305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoist, T., Cuneo, N., Jakšić, V. and Pillet, C.-A.. On entropy production of repeated quantum measurements II. Examples. J. Stat. Phys. 182(3) (2021), Paper no. 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M. and Petersen, K.. Hidden Markov processes in the context of symbolic dynamics. Entropy of Hidden Markov Processes and Connections to Dynamical Systems (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 385). Eds. B. Marcus, K. Petersen and T. Weissman. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, pp. 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M. and Tuncel, S.. Infinite-to-one codes and Markov measures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 285(2) (1984), 657684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Y. L., Feng, D. J. and Huang, W.. The thermodynamic formalism for sub-additive potentials. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 20(3) (2008), 639657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazottes, J. R. and Ugalde, E.. Projection of Markov measures may be Gibbsian. J. Stat. Phys. 111(5–6) (2003), 12451272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chazottes, J. R. and Ugalde, E.. On the preservation of Gibbsianness under symbol amalgamation. Entropy of Hidden Markov Processes and Connections to Dynamical Systems (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 385). Eds. B. Marcus, K. Petersen and T. Weissman. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, pp. 7297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuneo, N.. Additive, almost additive and asymptotically additive potential sequences are equivalent. Comm. Math. Phys. 37(3) (2020), 25792595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K. J.. A subadditive thermodynamic formalism for mixing repellers. J. Phys. A 21(14) (1988), 737742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D. J.. Lyapunov exponents for products of matrices and multifractal analysis. II. General matrices. Israel J. Math. 170 (2009), 355394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D. J.. Equilibrium states for factor maps between subshifts. Adv. Math. 226(3) (2011), 24702502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D. J. and Huang, W.. Lyapunov spectrum of asymptotically sub-additive potentials. Comm. Math. Phys. 297(1) (2010), 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iommi, G., Lacalle, C. and Yayama, Y.. Hidden Gibbs measures on shift spaces over countable alphabets. Stoch. Dyn. 20(4) (2020), 2050028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Käenmäki, A. and Reeve, H.. Multifractal analysis of Birkhoff averages for typical infinitely generated self-affine sets. J. Fractal Geom. 1(1) (2014), 83152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempton, T.. Factors of Gibbs measures for subshifts of finite type. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 43(4) (2011), 751764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledrappier, F. and Walters, P.. A relativised variational principle for continuous transformations. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 16(3) (1977), 568576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummert, A.. The thermodynamic formalism for almost-additive sequences. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 16(2) (2006), 435454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, K. and Shin, S.. On the definition of relative pressure for factor maps on shifts of finite type. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 37(4) (2005), 601612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfister, C.-E. and Sullivan, W. G.. Asymptotic decoupling and weak Gibbs measures for finite alphabet shift spaces. Nonlinearity 33(9) (2020), 47994817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piraino, M.. Projections of Gibbs states for Hölder potentials. J. Stat. Phys. 170(5) (2018), 952961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piraino, M.. Single site factors of Gibbs measures. Nonlinearity 33(2) (2020), 742761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollicott, M. and Kempton, T.. Factors of Gibbs measures for full shifts. Entropy of Hidden Markov Processes and Connections to Dynamical Systems (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 385). Eds. B. Marcus, K. Petersen and T. Weissman. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, pp. 246257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S.. Measures that maximize weighted entropy for factor maps between subshifts of finite type. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 21(4) (2001), 12491272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S.. An example of a factor map without a saturated compensation function. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 21(6) (2001), 18551866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S.. Relative entropy functions for factor maps between subshifts. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358(6) (2006), 22052216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbitskiy, E.. On factors of $g$ -measures. Indag. Math. (N.S.) 22(3–4) (2011), 315329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, P.. Relative pressure, relative equilibrium states, compensation functions and many-to-one codes between subshifts. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 296(1) (1986), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, P.. Regularity conditions and Bernoulli properties of equilibrium states and g-measures. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 71(2) (2005), 379396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yayama, Y.. Dimension of compact invariant sets of some expanding maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29(1) (2009), 281315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yayama, Y.. Existence of a measurable saturated compensation function between subshifts and its applications. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 31(5) (2011), 15631589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yayama, Y.. On factors of Gibbs measures for almost additive potentials. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 36(1) (2016), 276309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, J.. On factor maps that send Markov measures to Gibbs measure. J. Stat. Phys. 141(6) (2010), 10551070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar