Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T07:21:04.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigating the Preparedness of Iranian Families in the Face of Disasters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2022

Hamid Karimi Kivi ,
Mahmoudreza Peyravi  and
Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh
Hamid Karimi Kivi
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Mahmoudreza Peyravi*
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh*
Affiliation:
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
*
Corresponding authors: Mahmoudreza Peyravi, Email: peyravi110@gmail.com; and Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh, Email: miladahmadimarzaleh@yahoo.com.
Corresponding authors: Mahmoudreza Peyravi, Email: peyravi110@gmail.com; and Milad Ahmadi Marzaleh, Email: miladahmadimarzaleh@yahoo.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Preparedness in different sections of a society can improve the reactions of individuals at the time of disasters and strengthen the cooperation and coordination between people and organizations. The present study aimed to investigate the preparedness of households in Ardabil Province of Iran in the face of disasters in 2020.

Methods:

This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in Ardabil Province in Iran in 2020. The target population included the households living in Ardabil Province. The study was conducted on 10 502 participants. The data were collected using a questionnaire completed by trained questioners by referring to the participants’ houses. It should be noted that the questionnaires were completed by one of the household parents. The questionnaire contained 15 questions related to taking and not taking disaster preparedness measures at specific times. EXCEL 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and SPSS 23 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) were used for data analysis.

Results:

Considering the score of 1 for each action, the mean score of households’ disaster preparedness in Ardabil Province was 31.09%. The preparedness level of 51.4%, 42.31%, and 6.29% of the households in the province against disasters was at low, moderate, and good levels, respectively. Among the items of preparedness in the face of disasters, the highest value was related to the familiarity of family members with the initial warnings of significant hazards (5162 households, 49.15%) followed by planning for coping with disasters (43.12%) and assessing the non-structural vulnerability (38.93%). Furthermore, the results showed that the level of household preparedness was higher in the center of the province compared to other cities.

Conclusion:

Evaluating the level of preparedness of different societies in the face of disasters can be very useful in identifying the challenges to improve preparedness and, consequently, achieving sustainable development. This assessment can be considered a resource for provincial policy-making and planning to achieve the priorities set out in the Sendai framework. However, such assessments should be performed periodically, for example, annually, to reflect the effectiveness of the interventional measures in improving preparedness. Considering the low level of households’ preparedness in the present study, there is a gap between what people know and what they do, and comprehensive studies are needed on various factors that encourage people to take preparedness measures.

Keywords

disastersfamilyhealthpreparednesssafety
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 17 , 2023 , e116
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kilci, F, Yetis Kara, B, Bozkaya, B. Locating temporary shelter areas after an earthquake: a case for Istanbul. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;243(1):323-332.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z, Wang, W, Shi, Z, et al. Mental health problems among the survivors in the hard-hit areas of the Yushu earthquake. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietrzak, R, Tracy, M, Galea, S, et al. Resilience in the face of disaster: prevalence and longitudinal course of mental disorders following hurricane Ike. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38964.Google ScholarPubMed
Usami, M, Iwadare, Y, Kodaira, M, et al. Relationships between traumatic symptoms and environmental damage conditions among children 8 months after the 2011 Japan earthquake and tsunami. PLoS One. 2012;7:e50721.Google ScholarPubMed
White, H, Hsing, P, Cho, W, et al. Impact of the deepwater horizon oil spill on a deep-water coral community in the Gulf of Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:20303-20308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, G, Ying, Y, Liu, Y, et al. Incidences, types, and influencing factors of snow disaster-associated injuries in Ningbo, China, 2008. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6:363-369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitsi-Selmi, A, Egawa, S, Sasaki, H, et al. The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: renewing the global commitment to people’s resilience, health, and well-being. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2015;6(2):164-176.Google Scholar
Natural Disasters 2019. CRED. Published 2020. Accessed January 19, 2015. https://emdat.be/sites/default/files/adsr_2019.pdf Google Scholar
Naderi, N, Mohammadi, J. Locating temporary housing after the earthquake, using GIS and AHP techniques (a case study: 15 districts of Isfahan City). J Soc Issues Humanit. 2015;3(12):71-75.Google Scholar
Taheri Azad, l, Taheri Azad, A. The role of education in reducing the effects of natural disasters (earthquake case study). Conferences deal with natural disasters in 2006; Iran2006.Google Scholar
The International Disaster Database. EM-DAT, CRED/UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium. Accessed June 13, 2021. www.emdat.be (D. Guha-Sapir)Google Scholar
Prior, W. What it means to be a “good citizen” in Australia: perceptions of teachers, students, and parents. Theory Res Soc Educ. 1999;27(2):215-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muttarak, R, Pothisiri, W. The role of education on disaster preparedness: case study of 2012 Indian Ocean earthquakes on Thailand’s Andaman Coast. Ecol Soc. 2013;18(4):1-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keikha, A, Shahraki, Z, Hadadi, E, Nouri Delaveri, M. The role of public education of the Red Crescent Society in urban crisis management. J Relief Rescue. 2018;10(38):1-18.Google Scholar
Ardalan, A, Yusefi, H, Rouhi, N, et al. Household disaster preparedness in the Islamic Republic of Iran: 2015 estimation. East Mediterr Health J. 2020;26(4):382-387.Google ScholarPubMed
Najafi, M, Khankeh, H, Soltani, A, Atighechian, G. Reliability and validity of Household Disaster Preparedness Index (HDPI). Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2020;22(12):1-9.Google Scholar
Şakiroğlu, M. Variables related to earthquake preparedness behavior [master’s thesis]. Ankara: Middle East Technical University; 2005.Google Scholar
Resource Assistance for Rural Environments (Program), RARE, Oregon Natural Hazards Workgroup, Hood River County, Pasternak, MG. Hood River County: Natural hazards mitigation plan. Hood River County: University of Oregon; 2006.Google Scholar
Chen, CY, Xu, W, Dai, Y, et al. Household preparedness for emergency events: a cross-sectional survey on residents in four regions of China. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e032462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khorram-Manesh, A. Flexible surge capacity—public health, public education, and disaster management. Health Promot Perspect. 2020;10(3):175.Google Scholar
Najafi, M, Khankeh, HR, Elmi, H, Pourvakhshoori, N. Behavioral, normative and control beliefs about earthquake preparedness: a deductive content analysis study. PLoS Curr. 2018;10:1-8.Google ScholarPubMed
Tekeli-Yeşil, S. Factors Affecting the Process of Taking Action at Individual Level Regarding Mitigation and Preparedness for an Earthquake in Istanbul [master’s thesis]. Basel, Switzerland: University of Basel; 2009.Google Scholar
Musacchio, G, Falsaperla, S, Bernhardsdóttir, A, et al. Education: can a bottom-up strategy help for earthquake disaster prevention? Bull Earthq Eng. 2016;14(7):2069-2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahangiri, K. Designing a model for public education against earthquake in Tehran: final report [Persian]. Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research (IHSR), Iranian Academic Center for Education, Culture & Research (ACECR); 2006.Google Scholar