Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:09:05.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro anthelmintic activity of Chicory extracts from plants of different vegetative stages on Teladorsagia circumcincta L3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

Z Parrisi*
Affiliation:
School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
S Athanasiadou
Affiliation:
Disease Systems, SAC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
J G M Houdijk
Affiliation:
Disease Systems, SAC, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
I Kyriazakis
Affiliation:
Veterinary Faculty, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, Greece
*
Get access

Extract

The consumption of plants rich in plant secondary metabolites has been associated with improved resilience of parasitised hosts, i.e. their ability to perform under parasitic infection, compared to animals fed conventional feeds (Athanasiadou et al., 2007). Furthermore, such bio-active plants can improve host resistance, which refers to the host ability to regulate gastrointestinal nematode establishment, development, fecundity and survival (Athanasiadou et. al. 2008). Chichorium intybus L. (chicory) is such a bio-active forage and its potential anthelmintic activity is currently investigated as an alternative means to control parasitism in sheep production systems. In the present study we employed an in vitro assay to study a possible mechanism of anti-parasitic action arising from chicory, and to test whether this anthelmintic activity is affected by the vegetative stage of the plant.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Athanasiadou, S., Gray, D., Younie, D., Tzamaloukas, O., Jackson, F. and Kyriazakis, I. (2007). Parasitol., 134, 299–307.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, S., Houdijk, J., and Kyriazakis, I. (2008). Small. Rum. Research, 76, 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar