Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T22:53:17.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A psychoeducational intervention to improve sexual functioning in male rectal and anal cancer patients: A pilot randomized controlled trial study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2024

Christian J. Nelson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Tammy A. Schuler
Affiliation:
Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
Anne S. Reiner
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Raymond E. Baser
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Caraline C. Demirjian
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
John Mulhall
Affiliation:
Sexual & Reproductive Medicine Program, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Larissa Temple
Affiliation:
Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
Leslie Schover
Affiliation:
Private Practice, Houston
Lina Jandorf
Affiliation:
Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Katherine N. DuHamel
Affiliation:
KND Consulting, New York, NY, USA
*
Corresponding author: Christian J. Nelson; Email: nelsonc@mskcc.org

Abstract

Objectives

Male rectal and anal cancer patients demonstrate high rates of sexual dysfunction. This pilot randomized controlled trial tested a psychoeducational intervention designed to improve psychosexual adjustment.

Methods

Rectal or anal cancer patients were randomized to a Sexual Health Intervention for Men (intervention) or to a referral and information control (control). The intervention included control activities plus 4 sexual health intervention sessions every 4–6 weeks and 3 brief telephone calls timed between these sessions. Assessments were completed pre-intervention (baseline) and 3 months (follow-up 1) and 8 months (follow-up 2) post-intervention. Differences were assessed with statistical significance and Cohen’s d effect sizes (d = 0.2, small effect; d = 0.5, moderate effect; d = 0.8, large effect).

Results

Ninety subjects enrolled. Forty-three participants completed at least 1 follow-up assessment (intervention, n = 14; control n = 29). At follow-up 1, men in intervention, compared to control, improved on all domains of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) (p < 0.001 to p < 0.05) and demonstrated large effects (d = 0.8 to d = 1.5). Similarly, at follow-up 2, changes in all domains of the IIEF except the orgasm domain were either statistically significant or marginally statistically significant (p = 0.01 to p = 0.08) and demonstrated moderate to large treatment effects for intervention versus control (d = 0.5 to d = 0.8). Men in the intervention, compared to control, demonstrated decreased sexual bother at follow-up 1 (p = 0.009, d = 1.1), while Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) total scores and the SEAR sexual relationship subscale demonstrated moderate increases for intervention versus control (d = 0.4 to d = 0.6).

Significance of results

This study provides initial evidence for combining a psychoeducational intervention with medical interventions to address sexual dysfunction following rectal and anal cancer. Trials register number: NCT00712751 (date of registration: 7/10/2008).

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACS (2020a) Cancer Facts & Figures 2020. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.Google Scholar
ACS (2020c) Treatment of rectal cancer, by stage. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/colon-rectal-cancer/treating/by-stage-rectum.html#written_by (accessed 01 October 2021).Google Scholar
ACS (2020d) Treatment of anal cancer, by stage. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/anal-cancer/treating/by-stage.html (accessed 01 October 2021).Google Scholar
Althof, SE, Cappelleri, JC, Shpilsky, A, et al. (2003) Treatment responsiveness of the Self-Esteem and Relationship questionnaire in erectile dysfunction. Urology 61(5), 888892. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00041-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ball, M, Nelson, CJ, Shuk, E, et al. (2013) Men’s experience with sexual dysfunction post-rectal cancer treatment: A qualitative study. Journal of Cancer Education 28(3), 494502. doi:10.1007/s13187-013-0492-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsky Reese, J, Porter, LS, Regan, KR, et al. (2014) A randomized pilot trial of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer. Psychooncology 23(9), 10051013. doi:10.1002/pon.3508CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Befort, CA, Zelefsky, MJ, Scardino, PT, et al. (2005) A measure of health-related quality of life among patients with localized prostate cancer: Results from ongoing scale development. Clinical Prostate Cancer 4(2), 100108. doi:10.3816/CGC.2005.n.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breukink, SO and Donovan, KA (2013) Physical and psychological effects of treatment on sexual functioning in colorectal cancer survivors. Journal of Sexual Medicine 10(Suppl 1), 7483. doi:10.1111/jsm.12037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canada, AL, Neese, LE, Sui, D, et al. (2005) Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104(12), 26892700. doi:10.1002/cncr.21537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1), 155159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creamer, M, Bell, R and Balilla, S (2002) Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Behaviour Research and Therapy 41, 14891496. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havenga, K and Welvaart, K (1991) Sexual dysfunction in men following surgical treatment for rectosigmoid carcinoma. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 135(16), 710713.Google ScholarPubMed
Heiman, JR, Talley, DR, Bailen, JL, et al. (2007) Sexual function and satisfaction in heterosexual couples when men are administered sildenafil citrate (Viagra) for erectile dysfunction: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 114(4), 437447. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01228.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendren, SK, O’Connor, BI, Liu, M, et al. (2005) Prevalence of male and female sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer. Annals of Surgery 242(2), 212223. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000171299.43954.ceCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Incrocci, L and Jensen, PT (2013) Pelvic radiotherapy and sexual function in men and women. Journal of Sexual Medicine 10(Suppl 1), 5364. doi:10.1111/jsm.12010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mannaerts, GH, Schijven, MP, Hendrikx, A, et al. (2001) Urologic and sexual morbidity following multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 27(3), 265272. doi:10.1053/ejso.2000.1099CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milbury, K, Cohen, L, Jenkins, R, et al. (2013) The association between psychosocial and medical factors with long-term sexual dysfunction after treatment for colorectal cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer 21(3), 793802. doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1582-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moriya, Y (2006) Function preservation in rectal cancer surgery. International Journal of Clinical Oncology 11(5), 339343. doi:10.1007/s10147-006-0608-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, CJ, Lacey, S, Kenowitz, J, et al. (2015) Men’s experience with penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy: A qualitative study with the goal of informing a therapeutic intervention. Psychooncology 24(12), 16461654. doi:10.1002/pon.3771CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reese, JB, Porter, LS, Somers, TJ, et al. (2012) Pilot feasibility study of a telephone-based couples intervention for physical intimacy and sexual concerns in colorectal cancer. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 38(5), 402417. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2011.606886CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, RC, Riley, A, Wagner, G, et al. (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): A multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6), 822830. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00238-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schover, LR, Canada, AL, Yuan, Y, et al. (2012) A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment. Cancer 118(2), 500509. doi:10.1002/cncr.26308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaffer, KM, Nelson, CJ and DuHamel, KN (2018) Barriers to participation in a sexual health intervention for men following treatment for rectal and anal cancer. Psychooncology 27(3), 10821085. doi:10.1002/pon.4593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, V, Grant, M, Wendel, CS, et al. (2016) Sexual function and health-related quality of life in long-term rectal cancer survivors. The Journal of Sexual Medicine 13(7), 10711079. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Titta, M, Tavolini, IM, Moro, FD, et al. (2006) Sexual counseling improved erectile rehabilitation after non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy or cystectomy—Results of a randomized prospective study. Journal of Sexual Medicine 3(2), 267273. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00219.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, DS and Marmar, CR (1997) The impact of event scale—revised. Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD 2, 168189. doi:10.1037/t12199-000Google Scholar
Yerramilli, D, Drapek, L, Nipp, RD, et al. (2019) Sexual function, quality of life, and mood after radiation therapy in patients with anal cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 51, 204210. doi:10.1007/s12029-019-00233-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar