No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
RapidPlan models for prostate radiotherapy treatment planning with 10-MV photon beams
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 October 2022
Abstract
Introduction:
The RapidPlan is a radiotherapy planning tool that uses a dataset of approved plans to predict the dose distribution and automatically generates the dose–volume constraints for optimisation of the new plan. This study compares three strategies of model building for the treatment of prostate cancer with the 10-MV photon beam.
Methods:
Three models for prostate treatment were compared: Model 6X, Model10X and Model6Xrefined. Model6X is already used in our department and was trained on treatment plans based on the 6-MV photon beam. Model10X was trained on treatment plans based on the 10-MV photon beam and manually optimised by an experienced medical physicist. Finally, Model6Xrefined was trained on plans automatically created by the Model6X, but using the 10-MV photon beam. The three models were used to generate 25 new plans with the 10-MV photon beam.
Results:
Model10X generated plans with 2 Gy lower mean dose to bladder-PTV and rectum-PTV volumes and 8% lower V15Gy at bladder and rectum volumes, although the number of monitor units increased by 170 on average.
Conclusions:
The model trained on manually optimised plans generated plans with higher normal tissue sparing. However, model building is a time-consuming process, so a cost–benefit balance should be performed.
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Footnotes
†
Equally contributed to this work and should be considered as co-first authors.
References
Fogliata, A, Cozzi, L, Reggiori, G et al. RapidPlan knowledge based planning: iterative learning process and model ability to steer planning strategies. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14 (187): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattes, M D, Tai, C, Lee, A, Ashamalla, H, Ikoro, N C. The dosimetric effects of photon energy on the quality of prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2014; 4: e39–e44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasler, M, Georg, D, Wirtz, H, Lutterbach, J. Effect of photon-beam energy on VMAT and IMRT treatment plan quality and dosimetric accuracy for advanced prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2011; 187: 792–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pirzkall, A, Carol, MP, Pickett, B, Xia, P, Roach, M, 3rd, Verhey, LJ. The effect of beam energy and number of fields on photon-based IMRT for deep-seated targets. Int J Radiat Oncol 2002; 53: 434–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleiner, H, Podgorsak, MB. The dosimetric significance of using 10 MV photons for volumetric modulated arc therapy for post-prostatectomy irradiation of the prostate bed. Radiol Oncol 2016; 50: 232–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussein, M, South, CP, Barry, MA et al. Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy. Radiother Oncol 2016; 120: 473–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fusella, M, Scaggion, A, Pivato, N, Rossato, MA, Zorz, A, Paiusco, M. Efficiently train and validate a RapidPlan model through APQM scoring. Med Phys 2018; 45 (6): 2611–2619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delaney, AR, Tol, JP, Dahele, M, Cuijpers, J, Slotman, BJ, Verbakel, WF Effect of dosimetric outliers on the performance of a commercial knowledge-based planning solution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 94 (3): 469–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castriconi, R, Fiorino, C, Broggi, S et al. Comprehensive Intra-Institution stepping validation of knowledge-based models for automatic plan optimization. Phys Med 2019; 57: 231–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cagni, E, Botti, A, Micera, R et al. Knowledge-based treatment planning: an inter-technique and intersystem feasibility study for prostate cancer. Phys Med 2017; 36: 38–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatterjee, A, Serban, M, Faria, S, Souhami, L, Cury, F, Seuntjens, J Novel knowledge-based treatment planning model for hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients. Phys Med 2020; 69: 36–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bossart, E, Duffy, M, Simpson, G, Abramowitz, M, Pollack, A, Dogan, N Assessment of specific versus combined purpose knowledge based models in prostate radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19 (6): 209–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salembier, C, Villeirs, G, De Bari, B et al. ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on CT- and MRI-based target volume delineation for primary radiation therapy of localized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127 (1): 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, C, Castro, E, Fizazi, K et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, ESMO Guidelines Committee Ann Oncol 2020; 31 (9): 1119–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aviles, JEA, Marcos, MIC, Sasaki, D, et al. Creation of knowledge-based planning models intended for large scale distribution: minimizing the effect of outlier plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19: 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogliata, A, Belosi, F, Clivio, A et al. On the pre-clinical validation of a commercial model-based optimization engine: application to volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with lung or prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2014; 113: 385–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Y, Li, S, Yue, H et al. Impact of nominal photon energies on normal tissue sparing in knowledge-based radiotherapy treatment planning for rectal cancer patients. PLoS One 2019; 14 (3): e0213271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schubert, C, Waletzko, O, Weiss, C et al. Intercenter validation of a knowledge based model for automated planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. The experience of the German RapidPlan Consortium. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0178034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, RM, Hertel, NE, Wang, Z, Hutchinson, J, Fullerton, GD. Calculation of effective dose from measurements of secondary neutron spectra and scattered photon dose from dynamic MLC IMRT for 6 MV, 15 MV, and 18 MV beam energies. Med Phys 2006; 33: 360–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kry, SF, Salehpour, M, Followill, DS et al. Out-of-fi eld photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 1204–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hälg, RA, Besserer, J, Boschung, M, Mayer, S, Lomax, AJ, Schneider, U. Measurements of the neutron dose equivalent for various radiation qualities, treatment machines and delivery techniques in radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2014; 59 (10): 2457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oblozinský, P. Handbook of Photonuclear Data for Applications: Cross Sections and Spectra. International Atomic Energy Association report IAEA-TECDOC-1178. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2000.Google Scholar