Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:15:55.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Corpus pragmatic studies on the history of medical discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2022. Pp. vii + 322. ISBN 9789027211101.

Review products

Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Corpus pragmatic studies on the history of medical discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2022. Pp. vii + 322. ISBN 9789027211101.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2023

Francisco Alonso-Almeida*
Affiliation:
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
*
Discourse, Communication & Society (DiCoS) Departamento de Filología Moderna, Traducción e Interpretación Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria C/ Pérez del Toro, 1 35004 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Spain francisco.alonso@ulpgc.es

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. 2015. The functions of seem and parecer in early medical writing. Discourse Studies 17(2), 121–40.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. Forthcoming. Stance matrices and interpersonal meaning in nineteenth-century women's instructive writing in English. Language Value 22(1).Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Álvarez-Gil, Francisco J.. 2021. Evaluative that-structures in the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. In Moskowich, Isabel, Lareo, Inés & Camiña, Gonzalo (eds.), ‘All families and genera’: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts, 228–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Mele-Marrero, Margarita. 2014. Stancetaking in seventeenth-century prefaces on obstetrics. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1), 135.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Sánchez, Ángeles. 2016. ‘If they have not the french’: Translation choices in The Happy Deliverie of Women (1612). The Translator 22(1), 4058.Google Scholar
Banks, David. 2008. The development of scientific writing, linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Banks, David. 2017. The birth of the academic article: Le Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions, 1665–1700. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of written and spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi. 2015. Introduction. In Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics, 18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrió Pastor, María Luisa. 2020. Conocer la lengua a través de los corpus: La herramienta METOOL, retos para el análisis de los marcadores discursivos. Pragmalingüística 28, 255–74.Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie. 2006. The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics 27(3), 492518.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2009. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship of two different categories. Functions of Language 16, 4462.Google Scholar
Green, Monica. 2005. Flowers, poisons and men: Menstruation in medieval Western Europe. In Shail, Andrew & Howie, Gillian (eds.), Menstruation: A cultural history, 5164. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2000. Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoff (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 176207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Su, Hang. 2017. Patterns, constructions, and local grammar: A case study of ‘evaluation’. Applied Linguistics 40(4), 567–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Jiang, Feng (Kevin). 2018. ‘We believe that …’: Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38(2), 139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly. 2005a. Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language 12(1), 3963.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly. 2005b. Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 24(2), 123–39.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2009. Historical corpus pragmatics: Focus on speech acts and texts. In Jucker, Andreas H., Schreier, Daniel & Hundt, Marianne (eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse, 1136. Amsterdam: Brill.Google Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva Presser, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Stephen, Nowak, Martin A. & Aiden, Erez Lieberman. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–82.Google Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel, Lareo, Inés & Camiña, Gonzalo (eds.). 2021. ‘All families and genera’: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús 2017. Editorial. Corpus Pragmatics 1, 12.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1986. Fictional worlds. In Coulthard, Malcolm (ed.), Talking about text: Studies presented to David Brazil on his retirement, 4360. Birmingham: English Language Research.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2011. Medical case reports and scientific thought-styles. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 17, 7598.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Jucker, Andreas H. & Tuominen, Jukka. 2014. Diachronic corpus pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar