Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:21:38.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the scope for transboundary collaboration in the Blue Nile river basin: downstream willingness to pay for upstream land use changes to improve irrigation water supply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Abonesh Tesfaye  and
Roy Brouwer
Abonesh Tesfaye
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Economics, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: abonesh.tesfaye@gmail.com
Roy Brouwer
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Economics, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: roy.brouwer@vu.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study we model the preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) of downstream farmers in one of the largest irrigation schemes worldwide in Sudan for improved irrigation water supply through transboundary collaboration with farmers upstream in Ethiopia. In a choice experiment, Sudanese farmers are asked to pay an increase in existing irrigation fees to secure future irrigation water availability by either enhancing the removal of sediments in their local irrigation channels or compensating farmers in the Ethiopian highlands for taking soil conservation measures to prevent land degradation and soil erosion. Although Sudanese farmers downstream do not feel very connected to farmers upstream in Ethiopia, we find a high degree of trust in international cooperation and a positive WTP for improved irrigation water supply and water use efficiency through transboundary collaboration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 180 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, A.A., Osman, I.S., and Babiker, A. (2006), ‘Sediment and aquatic weeds management challenges in Gezira irrigated scheme’, Paper presented at the International Sediment Initiative Conference, 12–15 November, Khartoum, Sudan.Google Scholar
Alemayehu, B., Hagos, F., Haileselassie, A., Mapedza, E., Gebreselasse, S., Bekele, S., and Peden, D. (2008), ‘Payment for environmental service for improved land and water management: the case of Koga and Gumara watersheds of the Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia’, Proceedings of CPWF Second International Workshop, November, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Ali, M.H. (2011), Practices of Irrigation and On-Farm Water Management, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ansink, A. and Weikard, H.P. (2012), ‘Sequential sharing rules for river sharing problems’, Social Choice and Welfare 38: 187–210.Google Scholar
Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B., et al. (2002), Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bhaduri, A. and Barbier, E.B. (2008), ‘International water transfer and sharing: the case of the Ganges River’, Environment and Development Economics 1: 29–51.Google Scholar
Bhat, C.R. (2001), ‘Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of mixed multinomial logit model’, Transportation Research Part B 35: 677–693.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R., Dekker, T., Rolfe, J., and Windle, J. (2010), ‘Choice certainty and consistency in repeated choice experiments’, Environment and Resource Economics 46: 93–109.Google Scholar
Calzadilla, A., Rehdanz, K., and Tol, R.S.J. (2011), ‘Trade liberalization and climate change: a computable general equilibrium analysis of the impacts on global agriculture’, Water 3: 526–548.Google Scholar
Cummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S., and Schulze, W.D. (1986), Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
Deng, X.P., Shan, L., Zhang, H., and Turner, N.C. (2006), ‘Improving agricultural water use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas of China’, Agricultural Water Management 80: 23–40.Google Scholar
Dinar, S. (2007), International Water Treaties: Negotiation and Cooperation along Transboundary Rivers, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dinar, A. and Mody, J. (2004), ‘Irrigation water management policies: allocation and pricing principles and implementation experience’, Natural Resources Forum 28: 112–122.Google Scholar
Dombrowsky, I. (2007), Conflict, Cooperation and Institutions in International Water Management: An Economic Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Eldaw, A.M. (2004), ‘The Gezira Scheme: perspectives for sustainable development’, Report and Working Paper No. 2, German Development Institute, Bonn.Google Scholar
Elhassan, M. and Ahmed, E. (2008), ‘Watershed degradation and its impacts on agricultural area and crop production in Gezira Scheme’, Paper presented at the Nile Basin Development Forum, 17–19 November, Khartoum, Sudan.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B. and Furby, L. (1988), ‘Measuring values: a conceptual framework for interpreting transactions’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 147–184.Google Scholar
Gismalla, Y. (2009), ‘Sedimentation problems in the Blue Nile reservoirs and Gezira scheme: a review’, Gezira Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 14: 1–12.Google Scholar
Hensher, D., Rose, J., and Greene, W.A. (2005), Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hynes, S., Hanley, N., and Scarpa, R. (2008), ‘Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90: 1011–1027.Google Scholar
Johansson, R.C., Tsur, Y., Roe, T.L., Doukkali, R., and Dinar, A. (2002), ‘Pricing irrigation water: a review of theory and practice’, Water Policy 4: 173–199.Google Scholar
Krinsky, I. and Robb, A.L. (1986), ‘On approximating the statistical properties of elasticity’, Review of Economics and Statistics 68: 715–719.Google Scholar
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., and Swait, J.D. (2003), Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. (1974), ‘Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior’, in Zarembka, P. (eds), Frontiers of Econometrics, New York: Academic Press, pp. 105–142.Google Scholar
Merrey, D.J. and Gebreselassie, T. (2011), ‘Promoting improved rainwater and land management in the Blue Nile (Abay) basin of Ethiopia’, NBDC Technical Report No. 1, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Y., Thiruvarudchelvan, T., Mamad, N., Mul, M., and Van der Zaag, P. (2011), ‘Performance assessment of large irrigation systems using satellite data: the case of the Gezira scheme, Sudan’, Paper presented at the ICID 21st International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, 15–23 October, Tehran, Iran.Google Scholar
Morey, E. and Rossman, K.G. (2003), ‘Using stated-preference questions to investigate variations in willingness to pay for preserving marble monuments: classic heterogeneity, random parameters and mixture models’, Journal of Cultural Economics 27: 215–229.Google Scholar
Omer, A.M. (2011), ‘Agriculture policy in Sudan: a review’, Agricultural Science Research Journal 1: 1–29.Google Scholar
Plusquellec, H. (1999), ‘The Gezira irrigation scheme in Sudan: objective, design and performance’, World Bank Technical Paper No. 120, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Prinz, D. and Malik, A.H. (2004), ‘More yield with less water: how efficient can be water conservation in agriculture?’, European Water 5(6): 47–58.Google Scholar
Provencher, B. and Bishop, R.C. (2004), ‘Does accounting for preference heterogeneity improve the forecasting of a random utility model?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48: 793–810.Google Scholar
Revelt, D. and Train, K. (1998), ‘Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choice of appliance efficiency level’, Review of Economics and Statistics 53: 647–657.Google Scholar
Rigby, D., Alcon, F., and Burton, M. (2010), ‘Supply uncertainty and economic value of irrigation water’, European Review of Agricultural Economics 37: 97–117.Google Scholar
Saiih, A.E.M., Abdalla, O.A., Sidahmed, M., Fakl, H., and Ismail, M.A. (1993), ‘Wheat production in the Gezira scheme’, Paper presented at the International Conferences on Wheat in Heat-Stressed Environments, 1–4 February, Wad Medani, Sudan.Google Scholar
Scarpa, R., Ferrini, S., and Willis, K.G. (2005), ‘Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments’, in Scarpa, R. and Alberini, A. (eds), Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 247–273.Google Scholar
Speelman, S., Farolfi, S., Frija, A., and Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2010), ‘Valuing improvements in the water rights system in South Africa: a contingent ranking approach’, Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46: 1133–1144.Google Scholar
Swait, J. and Louviere, J. (1993), ‘The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models’, Journal of Marketing Research 30: 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesfaye, A. and Brouwer, R. (2012), ‘Testing participation constraints in contract design for sustainable soil conservation in Ethiopia’, Ecological Economics 73: 168–178.Google Scholar
Train, K. (2003), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsur, Y. (2005), ‘Economic aspects of irrigation water pricing’, Canadian Water Resources Journal 30: 31–46.Google Scholar
Veettil, P.C., Speelman, S., Frija, A., Buysse, J., Mondelaers, K., and van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011), ‘Price sensitivity of farmer preferences for irrigation water pricing method: evidence from a choice model analysis in Krishna river basin, India’, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 137(2): 205–214.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Liu, C., and Zhang, L. (2002), ‘Water-saving agriculture in China: an overview’, Advances in Agronomy 75: 135–171.Google Scholar
Ward, F. (2010), ‘Financing irrigation water management and infrastructure: a review’, Water Resources Development 26: 321–349.Google Scholar
Wolf, A.T. (2007), ‘Shared waters: conflict and cooperation’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 241–269.Google Scholar
World Bank (2000), ‘Options for the sustainable development of the Gezira scheme’, Report No. 20398-SU, World Bank Document, Washington, DC.Google Scholar