Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T10:01:31.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy and Safety of Lurasidone in a Younger Population With Bipolar Depression: Pooled Post-hoc Analysis of Two Placebo-controlled Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2023

Chris Davey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
Aswin Ratheesh
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia Orygen, Centre for Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia
Michael Tocco
Affiliation:
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teaneck, NJ, and Marlborough, MA, USA
Yongcai Mao
Affiliation:
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teaneck, NJ, and Marlborough, MA, USA
David George;
Affiliation:
Servier Laboratories (Aust.) Pty. Ltd., Burnley, Australia
Andrei Pikalov
Affiliation:
Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teaneck, NJ, and Marlborough, MA, USA
Manpreet K Singh
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Early onset of bipolar disorder is associated with high rates of psychiatric comorbidity (e.g., anxiety disorders, ADHD, PTSD), high rates of recurrence, and marked impairment in functioning and quality of life. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone in bipolar depression in youth and young adult patients (10–30 years old).

Methods

Data from two 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of lurasidone monotherapy for bipolar I depression were pooled for this analysis. In the 1st study, patients 10–17 years old were evaluated using the Children’s Depression Rating Scale–Revised (CDRS-R) and the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Severity (CGI-BP-S) depression scale; in the 2nd study, a subgroup of adult patients (18–30 years old) were evaluated by CGI-BP-A, and the MADRS, with the latter being converted to a CDRS-R scores using a validated conversion algorithm.

Results

The safety population consisted of 465 patients (mean age, 17.1 years; mean age of onset, 14.1; mean CDRS-R total score, 60.8). 400 patients (85.7%) completed the study. For lurasidone vs. placebo, LS mean Week 6 change was -21.4 vs. -15.3 for the CDRS-R total score (P<0.0001; ES, 0.46); and -1.6 vs. -1.1 for the CGI-BP-S score (P<0.0001; ES, 0.50). Adverse events (≥5%) on lurasidone vs. placebo were nausea (15.9% vs. 5.2%), headache (15.1% vs. 13.1%), somnolence (7.9% vs. 3.8%), vomiting (5.2% vs. 3.3%), and weight increase (5.2% vs. 2.3%). No clinically meaningful changes were observed in weight, metabolic parameters, or prolactin.

Conclusions

In this post-hoc analysis of two placebo-controlled trials, lurasidone demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement of depressive symptoms in youth and young adults with bipolar depression. Lurasidone was generally safe, well-tolerated, and associated with minimal effects on weight, metabolic parameters, and prolactin.

Funding

Servier Laboratories (Aust.) Pty. Ltd., and Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press