Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:04:49.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2018 HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: FOLK WISDOM IN ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2020

Evelyn L. Forget
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article highlights the roles played by knowledge brokers in the history of economics. Knowledge creation is the joint product of teams of people engaged in parallel work. Economists do their professional work, whether that involves creating elaborate theories, gathering and interpreting data, or conducting experiments, all the while creating a variety of competing narratives about the economy. Economic agents go about their daily lives creating goods and services, caring for one another, saving and consuming, all the while making decisions based on whatever narratives they believe about how the economy functions. The various narratives between and among economists and economic agents create market opportunities for knowledge brokers, who sell their services to whoever will pay. They popularize economic insights in bestselling books, and work for think tanks or with various organizations, but they are also textbook writers, journal editors, and conference organizers, all of whom jointly contribute to the edifice of economic knowledge and facilitate communication. European beekeeping is used as an analogy.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

University of Manitoba. I’d like to thank David Laidler and, especially, Jimena Hurtado and Pedro Garcia Duarte for very helpful advice.

References

REFERENCES

Aristotle [344–342 BCE?] 1965. HIstoria Animalium. Translated by A. Peck, L.. Greek and English. London: Heineman; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baden-Powell, Robert. 2014. Scouting for Boys: The Original 1908 Edition. Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Bonsels, Waldemar. [1912] 1917. Die Biene Maja und ihre Abenteuer. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags Anstalt.Google Scholar
Bourque, Kevin. 2006. “‘Tout est en desordre dans la ruche’: Republican Discourse, Patriarchal Strategy, Gendered Labour and the Bees of the Encyclopedie.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century (12): 361–376.Google Scholar
Butler, Charles. 1609. The feminine monarchie; or, a treatise concerning bees, and the dve [divine] ordering of them; wherein the truth, found out by experience and diligent observation, discovereith the idle and fond conceipts, which many have written anent this subiect. Oxford: Ioseph Barnes.Google Scholar
Cheung, Stephen. 1973. “The Fable of the Bees: An Economic Investigation.” The Journal of Law and Economics 16 (1): 11–33.Google Scholar
Crane, Eva. 1999. The World History of Beekeeping and Honey Hunting. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crane, Eva, and Walker, Penelope. 1984–85. “Evidence on Welsh Beekeeping in the Past—I.” Folk Life 23: 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Eva, and Walker, Penelope. 1985–86. “Evidence on Welsh Beekeeping in the Past—II.” Folk Life 24: 121–123.Google Scholar
Creager, Angela N., Lunbeck, Elizabeth, and Wise, M. Norton, eds. 2007. Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grouchy, Sophie, and Brown, Karin. 2008. Letters on Sympathy: A Critical Edition. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Elderkin, George W. 1939. “The Bee of Artemis.” The American Journal of Philology 60 (2): 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fife, Austin E. 1939. “The Concept of the Sacredness of Bees, Honey and Wax in Christian Popular Tradition.” PhD diss., Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
Fleury, Jean-Baptiste. 2012. “The Evolving Notion of Relevance: A Historical Perspective to the ‘Economics-Made-Fun’ Movement.” Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (4): 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, Evelyn L. 1996. “Margaret Gilpin Reid: A Manitoba Home Economist Goes to Chicago.” Feminist Economics 2 (3): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, Evelyn L. 2001a. “Cultivating Sympathy. Sophie Condorcet’s Letters on Sympathy.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (3): 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, Evelyn L. 2001b. “Saint-Simonian Feminism.” Feminist Economics 7 (1): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, Evelyn L. 2010. “‘At Best an Echo’: Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Translation Strategies in the History of Economics.” History of Political Economy 42 (4): 653–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, Evelyn L. 2016. “Jane Marcet as Knowledge Broker.” History of Economics Review 65 (1): 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, H. Malcolm. 1958. History of Beekeeping in Britain. London: Bee Research Association.Google Scholar
Frazee, Charles A. 1988. “The Origins of Clerical Celibacy in the Western Church.” Church History 57 (S1): 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guedj, Denis. 1988. La Révolution des savants. Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas. 1568. A Pleasant instruction of the parfit ordering of bees. Treatise annexed to third edition of The Profittable Art of Gardening. London: Thomas Marshe.Google Scholar
Holton, Frederick S. 1993. “Literary Tradition and the Old English Bee Charm .” Journal of Indo-European Studies 21 (1): 37f.Google Scholar
Lavis, John N. 2006. “Research, Public Policymaking, and Knowledge‐Translation Processes: Canadian Efforts to Build Bridges.” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26 (1): 37–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longgood, Wiliam. 1985. The Queen Must Die; And Other Affairs of Bees and Men. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard de. 2014. The Fable of the Bees, or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Kaye, Frederick B edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcet, Jane. 2009. Conversations on Political Economy. Edited and introduced by Evelyn Forget. Reprint of first edition. New Brunswick: Aldine (Transaction) Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre. 2016. “Adam Smith Did Humanomics: So Should We.” Eastern Economic Journal 42 (4): 503–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Donald. 1990. If You’re So Smart. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N., and McCloskey, Deirdre N.. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, James E. “External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation.” Economic Journal 62 (245): 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowksi, Philip. 1989. More Heat than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2017. Culture and Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary. 2012. The World in the Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prete, Frederick R. 1991. “Can Females Rule the Hive? The Controversy over Honey Bee Gender Roles in British Beekeeping Texts of the Sixteenth-Eighteenth Centuries.” Journal of the History of Biology 24 (1): 113–144.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Juan A. 2000. The Beehive Metaphor: From Gaudi to Corbusier. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Ransome, Hilda M. 2004. The Sacred Bee in Ancient Times and Folklore. Mineola, NY: Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
Roller, Lynn E. 1999. In Search of God the Mother: The Cult of Anatolian Cybele. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Seeley, Thomas D. 2010. Honeybee Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shiller, Robert J. 2017. “Narrative Economics.” The American Economic Review 107 (4): 967–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swammerdam, Jan. [1737–38 Biblia Naturae. Commentarium de Apibus] 1758. Book of Nature. Commentary on Bees. London: C.G. Seyffert.Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio. 1988. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the “Well-Ordered Society.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Lauren. 2017. “drones, swarms and becoming-insect: feminist utopias and posthuman politics.” Feminist Review 116 (1): 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bee. 2004. The Hive: The Story of the Honeybee and Us. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitfield, John. 2002. “The Police State .” Nature 25 (April): 782–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar