Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:43:24.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mandating Treatment for Pregnant Substance Abusers Is the Wrong Focus for Public Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Patricia Boling*
Affiliation:
Purdue University, USA
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Pregnancy and Substance Abuse
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daniels, C. (1993). At Women's Expense: State Power and the Politics of Fetal Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mathieu, D. (1995). “Mandating Treatment for Pregnant Substance Abusers: A Compromise.” Politics and the Life Sciences 14:199–208.Google Scholar
Roberts, D.E. (1991). “Punishing Drug Addicts Who Have Babies: Women of Color, Equality, and the Right of Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 104(7): 1419–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroedel, J.R. and Peretz, P. (1995). “A Gender Analysis of Policy Formation: The Case of Fetal Abuse.” In Boling, P. (ed.), Expecting Trouble: Surrogacy, Fetal Abuse, and New Reproductive Technologies. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Young, I. (1995). “Punishment, Treatment, Empowerment: Three Approaches to Policy for Pregnant Addicts.” In Boling, P. (ed.), Expecting Trouble: Surrogacy, Fetal Abuse, and New Reproductive Technologies. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar