No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Orientations de facilitation pour soutenir l’application de l’Algo dans les services de soutien à domicile des personnes aînées
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2023
Résumé
Comment soutenir le déploiement de connaissances coconstruites par des personnes cliniciennes, gestionnaires ou chercheures? Ce thème est abordé à partir de l’étude de l’application de l’Algo, un algorithme clinique décisionnel conçu pour la sélection des aides techniques visant à faciliter l’hygiène corporelle des personnes aînées vivant à domicile. L’objectif de cette note sur les politiques et les pratiques est de présenter les orientations de facilitation dégagées à la suite d’un devis mixte multiphases (2015–2019) mis en œuvre dans les services de soutien à domicile au Québec (Canada). Les orientations de facilitation centrée sur la tâche et holistique sont présentées en fonction des stades d’utilisation de l’Algo, afin de soutenir les personnes cliniciennes, gestionnaires et chercheures dans la poursuite de son application auprès des personnes aînées. De plus, cette note illustre l’apport des devis mixtes à la conduite et à la compréhension de l’application des connaissances coconstruites.
Abstract
How can the deployment of knowledge codeveloped by clinicians, managers, or researchers be supported? This theme is approached by exploring the utilization process of Algo, a clinical decision-making algorithm designed for the selection of bathing equipment supporting the hygiene of home-dwelling elderly people. The objective of this note on policies and practices is to present the facilitation orientations identified through a mixed multiphase research (2015–2019) implemented in homecare services in Quebec (Canada). A mapping of task-centered and holistic facilitation orientations based on the stages of utilization of Algo is presented to support clinicians, managers, and researchers in its further application with the elderly. This note also illustrates the contribution of a mixed design to the understanding and implementation of codeveloped knowledge translation.
Keywords
- Type
- Policy and Practice Note/Note de politique et practique
- Information
- Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 2024 , pp. 167 - 175
- Copyright
- © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2023
References
Références
Baker, R., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., Gillies, C., Shaw, E.J., Cheater, F., Flottorp, S., et Robertson, N. (2010). Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD005470.Google Scholar
Bird, M.-L., Mortenson, W., Chu, F., Acerra, N., Bagnall, E., Wright, A., et al. (2019). Building a bridge to the community: An integrated knowledge translation approach to improving participation in community-based exercise for people after stroke. Physical Therapy, 99(3), 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, S.J., et Graham, I.D. (2013a). Integrated knowledge translation. Straus, Dans D. S. E., Tetroe, J., et Graham, I. D. (eds.), Knowledge translation in health care: Moving from evidence to practice (2e éd., pp. 14–23). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, S. J., et Graham, I. D. (2013b). From knowledge translation to engaged scholarship: Promoting research relevance and utilization. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(1 Suppl 1), S3–S8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camden, C., Shikako-Thomas, K., Nguyen, T., Graham, E., Thomas, A., Sprung, J., et al. (2015). Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: A scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(15), 1390–1400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4e éd.). California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Davidson, K., et Nowicki, E. (2012). An exploration of the utility of a knowledge utilization framework to study the gap between reading disabilities research and practice. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 330–349.Google Scholar
Ellen, M. E., Lavis, J. N., Horowitz, E., et Berglas, R. (2018). How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., et Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs – principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagliardi, A. R., et Dobrow, M. J. (2016). Identifying the conditions needed for integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care organizations: Qualitative interviews with researchers and research users. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guay, M. (2012). Enjeux entourant le recours au personnel auxiliaire en ergothérapie – Issues surrounding the participation of auxiliary personnel in occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(2), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guay, M. (2017). Le point sur les travaux de développement de l’Algo, un outil d’aide à la décision pour la sélection des aides techniques pour l’hygiène corporelle des québécois vivant à domicile. Revue Francophone de Recherche en Ergothérapie, 3(1), 77–90.Google Scholar
Guay, M., Dubois, M.-F., Corrada, M., Garant, M. P., et Kawas, C. (2014b). Exponential increases in the prevalence of disability in the oldest old: A Canadian national survey. Gerontology, 60(5), 395–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guay, M., Dubois, M.-F., et Desrosiers, J. (2014c). Can home health aids using the clinical algorithm Algo choose the right bath seat for clients having a straightforward problem? Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(2), 172–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guay, M., Dubois, M.-F., Desrosiers, J., et Robitaille, J. (2012). Identifying characteristics of ’straightforward cases’ for which support personnel could recommend home bathing equipment. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(12), 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guay, M., Dubois, M.-F., Desrosiers, J., Robitaille, J., et Charest, J. (2010). The use of skill mix in home-care occupational therapy with patients with bathing difficulties. International Journal of Therapy and, Rehabilitation, 17(6), 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guay, M., Dubois, M.-F., Robitaille, J., et Desrosiers, J. (2014a). Development of Algo, a clinical algorithm for non-occupational therapists selecting bathing equipment. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(4), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guay, M., Gagnon, M., Ruest, M., et Bourget, A. (2016). Interrater reliability of Algo used by non-occupational therapist members of homecare interdisciplinary teams. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(9), 883–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guay, M., Levasseur, M., Turgeon-Londei, S., Dubois, M. F., et Desrosiers, J. (2013). Exploring support needed by home health aides in choosing bathing equipment: New challenges for occupational therapy collaboration. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment et Rehabilitation, 46(3), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guay, M., Ruest, M., et Contandriopoulos, D. (2019). Deimplementing untested practices in homecare services: A pre-post observational design. Occupational Therapy International, 2019, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, S. C., Kim, B., et Kitson, A. L. (2020b). Interactive workshop to develop implementation framework (i-PARIHS) resources to support practice facilitation. Implementation Science Communications, 1, 56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, S. C., Kim, B., et Kitson, A. L. (2023). Mobilising implementation of i-PARIHS (Mi-PARIHS): Development of a facilitation planning tool to accompany the integrated promoting action on research implementation in health services framework. Implementation Science Communications, 4, 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, S. C., Kim, B., Mudge, A., Hall, L., Young, A., McRae, P., et al. (2020a). Experiences of using the i-PARIHS framework: A co-designed case study of four multi-site implementation projects. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, R. B., et Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jull, J., Giles, A., et Graham, I. D. (2017). Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: Advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implementation Science, 12, 150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, G., et Kitson, A. (2015). Implementing evidence-based practice in healthcare – A facilitation guide. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., et McCormack, B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: A conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care, 7(3), 149–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitson, A. L., Rycroft-Malone, J., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K., et Titchen, A. (2008). Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARIHS framework: Theoretical and practical challenges. Implementation Science, 3, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knott, J., et Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? Knowledge-Creation Diffusion Utilization, 1(4), 537–578.Google Scholar
Kothari, A., et Wathen, C. N. (2013). A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. Health Policy, 109(2), 187–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreindler, S. A. (2016). What if implementation is not the problem? Exploring the missing links between knowledge and action. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 31, 208–226.Google Scholar
Kreindler, S. A. (2018). Advancing the evaluation of integrated knowledge translation. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16, 104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landsverk, J., Brown, H., Chamberlain, P., Palinkas, L. A., et Horwitz, S. M. (2012). Design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research. Brownson, Dans D. R. C., Colditz, G. A., et Proctor, E. K. (Eds.), Translating science to practice (pp. 225–260). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lavis, J. N., Robertson, D., Woodside, J. M., Mcleod, C. B., et Abelson, J. (2003). How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Quarterly, 81(2), 221–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lizarondo, L., McArthur, A., Lockwood, C., et Munn, Z. (2020). Facilitation of evidence implementation within a clinical fellowship program: A mixed methods study. JBI Evidence Implementation, 19(2), 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, J., Wong, C., Verrier Piersol, C., Clayton Bieber, D., Perry, B. L., et Leland, N. E. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in research: A scoping review of current evaluation methods. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 8(15), 1327–1341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCluskey, A., et Middleton, S. (2010). Delivering an evidence-based outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: Barriers and enablers experienced by community rehabilitation teams. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIsaac, J.-L. D., Penney, T. L., Storey, K. E., Sigfridson, L., Cunningham, J., Kuhle, S., et al. (2018). Integrated knowledge translation in population health intervention research: A case study of implementation and outcomes from a school-based project. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16, 72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowell, L. (2015). Pragmatism and integrated knowledge translation: Exploring the compatibilities and tensions. Nursing Open, 2(3), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Cathain, A., Murphy, E., et Nicholl, J. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ, 341, 1147–1150.Google ScholarPubMed
Oborn, E., Barrett, M., Prince, K., et Racko, G. (2013). Balancing exploration and exploitation in transferring research into practice: A comparison of five knowledge translation entity archetypes. Implementation Science, 8, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., et Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316.Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., et Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.Google Scholar
Ordre des ergothérapeutes du Québec. (2005). Participation du personnel non-ergothérapeute à la prestation des services d’ergothérapie: lignes directrices. Montréal: Ordre des ergothérapeutes du Québec.Google Scholar
Ordre des ergothérapeutes du Québec. (2008). Participation du personnel non-ergothérapeute à la prestation des services d’ergothérapie. Lignes directrices (OEQ, 2005) − addenda (OEQ, 2008). Montréal: Ordre des ergothérapeutes du Québec.Google Scholar
Palinkas, L. A., Aarons, G. A., Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M., et Landsverk, J. (2011). Mixed methods designs in implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(1), 44–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., et Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palinkas, L. A., et Rhoades Cooper, B. (2018). Mixed methods evaluation in dissemination and implementation science. Dans, R. C. Brownson, Colditz, G. A., et Proctor, E. K. (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health (2e éd., pp. 335–353). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parry, D., Salsberg, J., et Macaulay, A. C. (2015). Guide sur la collaboration entre les chercheurs et les utilisateurs des connaissances dans la recherché en santé (IRSC). Repéré le 6 janvier 2020 à http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/f/44954.html.Google Scholar
Raymond, M.-H., Demers, L., et Feldman, D. E. (2015). Waiting list management practices for home-care occupational therapy in the province of Quebec, Canada. Health and Social Care in the Community, 24(2), 154–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberge-Dao, J., Yardley, B., Menon, A., Halle, M.-C., Maman, J., Ahmed, S., et al. (2019). A mixed-methods approach to understanding partnership experiences and outcomes of projects from an integrated knowledge translation funding model in rehabilitation. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruest, M., Bourget, A., Delli-Colli, N., et Guay, M. (2016). Recommendations to foster standardization for the completion of Algo. Occupational Therapy Now, 18(1), 28–30.Google Scholar
Ruest, M., Bourget, A., Delli-Colli, N., et Guay, M. (2017). Algo used by homecare non-occupational therapists selecting bathing equipment: Enhancing standardization by exploring clinical reasoning in a multiple-case study. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 31(1), 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruest, M., et Guay, M. (2019). Étude du processus d’application de l’Algo dans les services de soutien à domicile du Québec. Ergothérapie Express, 30(3), 8, édition de septembre.Google Scholar
Ruest, M., et Guay, M. (2022). Apprivoiser l’étude de l’application desconnaissances à travers le prisme des méthodes de recherche mixtes. Revue Francophone de Recherche en Ergothérapie, 8(1), 71–84.Google Scholar
Ruest, M., Léonard, G., Thomas, A., Desrosiers, J., et Guay, M. (2022). Algo’s integrated knowledge translation process in homecare services: A cross-sectional correlational study for identifying its level of utilization and its associated characteristics. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 89(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruest, M., Léonard, G., Thomas, A., et Guay, M. (2021). Lessons on integrated knowledge translation through algorithm’s utilization in homecare services: A multiple case study. JBI Evidence Implementation, 19(4), 419–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rycroft-Malone, J., Seers, K., Eldh, A. C., Cox, K., Crichton, N., Harvey, G., et al. (2018). A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: An exemplar. Implementation Science, 13, 138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seers, K., Rycroft-Malone, J., Cox, K., Crichton, N., Edwards, R. T., Eldh, A. C., et al. (2018). Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE): An international cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate two models of facilitation informed by the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Implementation Science, 13, 137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serrata Malfitano, A. P., Whiteford, G., et Molineux, M. (2021). Transcending the individual: The promise and potential of collectivist approaches in occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(3), 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siu, E. C. Y., Levinton, C., et Brown, A. D. (2009). The value of performance measurement in promoting improvements in women’s health. Healthcare Policy, 5(2), 52–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Stanmore, E., et Waterman, H. (2007). Crossing professional and organizational boundaries: The implementation of generic rehabilitation assistants within three organizations in the northwest of England. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(9), 751–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stergiou-Kita, M. (2010). Implementing clinical practice guidelines in occupational therapy practice: Recommendations from the research evidence. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 57(2), 76–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., et Graham, I. D. (2013). Knowledge translation in healthcare: Moving from evidence to practice (2e éd.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tashakkori, A., et Teddlie, C. (2008). Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. Bergman, Dans M. M. (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications (pp. 101–119). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Eerd, D., Cole, D., Keown, K., Irvin, E., Kramer, D., Brenneman Gibson, J., et al. (2011). Report on knowledge transfer and exchange practices: A systematic review of the quality and types of instruments used to assess KTE implementation and impact. Repéré le 6 janvier 2020 à http://www.iwh.on.ca/sys-reviews/kte-evaluation-tools.Google Scholar
Williams, S., Keogh, S., Herd, D., Riggall, S., Glass, R., et Douglas, C. (2022). Building effective engagement for implementation with i-PARIHS: A collaborative enquiry into paediatric pain care in the emergency department. BMC Health Services Research, 22, 230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Designs and methods (Applied social research methods). (5e éd.). California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar