Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T03:36:10.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postcolonialism and Regimes of Time: Anniversary Journalism of the Hong Kong Handover in British and Chinese Newspapers, 1998–2020

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2023

Jiange Deng Open the ORCID record for Jiange Deng [Opens in a new window]  and
Zhongxuan Lin Open the ORCID record for Zhongxuan Lin [Opens in a new window]
Jiange Deng
Affiliation:
School of Global Affairs, King's College London, London, UK,
Zhongxuan Lin*
Affiliation:
School of Journalism and Communication, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Zhongxuan Lin; Email: lzhongx55@sina.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Temporality is important for understanding Hong Kong's postcolonial status since its handover from Britain to China in 1997. This study examines the mediated regimes of postcolonial temporalities in coverage of five anniversaries of the Hong Kong handover (between 1998 and 2020) in Chinese and British newspapers. In 1998, the Chinese and British press shared a significant consensus regarding the “legitimate continuity” of Hong Kong's colonial legacies; however, this consensus was increasingly undermined by ideological contestations surrounding the city's postcolonial ruptures and differences. The multiple temporal claims that emerged in Chinese and British newspapers were systemized within a proposed framework that combined temporal modes (the “formal structures” of temporal relations) and ideological appraisals (the “general politics” where temporal modes are (il)legitimized and (ab)normalized). The temporal complexity concerning Hong Kong exemplifies the former colony's dilemmatic “in-betweenness” and temporal inconclusiveness, which create an open discursive space that invites ideological investments by powerful symbolic stakeholders.

摘要

摘要

时间性是理解年香港九七回归以来后殖民地位的关键。本研究比较分析了中英两国媒体在五届香港回归周年报道（1998 年至 2020 年）中构建的“后殖民时间性政权”。在 1998 年的周年报道中，中英媒体就香港殖民遗产的“合法延续性”达成了一致；然而近些年来，环绕香港后殖民时间断裂性与差异性的意识形态争论取代了对“合法延续性”的共识。本文借助新的概念框架系统归纳了中英媒体周年报道呈现的多重时间主张；该框架整合了 a）时间模式（时间关系的“形式结构”）与 b）意识形态评估（时间关系的合法化与规范化）两个维度。中英媒体呈现的复杂时间性体现了香港“中间性”的后殖民状况与“未完成”的时间困局。这一独特的后殖民状态创造了一种开放的话语空间，可供有权势的符号持有者进行符合自身利益的意识形态诠释。

Keywords

postcolonialismthe regime of truthtemporalitiesHong Konganniversary journalismone countrytwo systems后殖民主义真理政权时间性香港周年报道一国两制
Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 256 , December 2023 , pp. 1018 - 1035
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Bartels, Anke, Eckstein, Lars, Waller, Nicole and Wiemann, Dirk. 2019. “Postcolonial futures.” In Bartels, Anke, Eckstein, Lars, Waller, Nicole and Wiemann, Dirk (eds.), Postcolonial Literatures in English. Stuttgart: JB Metzler, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Anne-Marie. 2009. Marketing Dictatorship: Propaganda and Thought Work in Contemporary China. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Anabela, and Burgess, Jacquelin. 2005. “Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003.” Risk Analysis: An International Journal 25(6), 1457–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castells, Manuel. 2009. The Rise of the Network Society. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. Provincializing Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. 1985. Saussure. London: FontanaGoogle Scholar
Duan, Ran, and Takahashi, Bruno. 2017. “The two-way flow of news: a comparative study of American and Chinese newspaper coverage of Beijing's air pollution.” International Communication Gazette 79(1), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert. 1993. “Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43(4), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John. 1997. “The discourse of colonial withdrawal: a case study in the creation of mythic discourse.” Discourse and Society 8(4), 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. “Truth and power.” In Gordon, Colin (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 109–133.Google Scholar
Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hartig, Falk. 2017. “China Daily: Beijing's global voice?” In Thussu, Daya Kishan, Burgh, Hugo de and Shi, Anbin (eds.), China's Media Go Global. London: Routledge, 122–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgesson, Stefan. 2014. “Radicalizing temporal difference: anthropology, postcolonial theory, and literary time.” History and Theory 53(4), 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordheim, Helge. 2014. “Introduction: multiple times and the work of synchronization.” History and Theory 53(4), 498–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, Séagh. 2020. “Regimes of temporality: China, Tibet and the politics of time in the post-2008 era.” Media, Culture and Society 42(7–8), 1133–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keightley, Emily. 2013. “From immediacy to intermediacy: the mediation of lived time.” Time and Society 22(1), 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Susan. 2012. “Forgetting the last big war: collective memory and liberation images in an off-year anniversary.” American Behavioural Scientist 56(2), 204–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitch, Carolyn. 2006. Pages from the Past: History and Memory in American Magazines. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ku, Agnes S. 2020. “New forms of youth activism – Hong Kong's Anti-Extradition Bill movement in the local–national–global nexus.” Space and Polity 24(1), 111–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwong, Ying-Ho. 2016. “State–society conflict radicalization in Hong Kong: the rise of ‘anti-China’ sentiment and radical localism.” Asian Affairs 47(3), 428–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Kurt, and Lang, Gladys Engel. 1989. “Collective memory and the news.” Communication 11, 123–139.Google Scholar
Law, Wing Sang. 2017. “Reunification discourse and Chinese nationalisms.” In Luke, Gary Chi-Hung (ed.), From a British to a Chinese Colony? Hong Kong before and after the 1997 Handover. Berkeley, CA: The Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 236–258.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Timothy. 2020. “Hong Kong is a colony once more.” The Atlantic, 1 July, https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/07/hong-kong-china-national-security-colony/613711/.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter D. 2002. “The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference.” South Atlantic Quarterly 101(1), 57–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, Vijay, and Hodge, Bob. 1991. “What is post (-) colonialism?” Textual Practice 5(3), 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1991. “The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics.” American Political Science Review 85(1), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, Stephan. 2015. “The Umbrella Movement and Hong Kong's protracted democratization process.” Asian Affairs 46(1), 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Zhongdang, Lee, Chin-Chuan, Chan, Joseph Man and So, Clement Y.K.. 1999. “One event, three stories: media narratives of the handover of Hong Kong in cultural China.” Gazette 61(2), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poell, Thomas. 2020. “Social media, temporality, and the legitimacy of protest.” Social Movement Studies 19(5–6), 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1983. Course in General Linguistics (Roy Harris (trans.)). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Scott, Ian. 2017. “One country, two systems: the end of a legitimating ideology?” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 39(2), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shohat, Ella. 2006. “Notes on the ‘post-colonial’.” In Shohat, Ella (ed.), Taboo Memories, Diasporic Voices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sing, Ming. 2004. Hong Kong's Tortuous Democratization: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, Alvin Y. 2011. “‘One country, two systems’ and Hong Kong–China national integration: a crisis-transformation perspective.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 41(1), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuchman, Gaye. 1978. Making News. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Van Ginneken, Jaap. 1998. Understanding Global News: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Virilio, Paul. 2005. The Information Bomb. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Wang, Zheng. 2014. Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Weir, Lorna. 2008. “The concept of truth regime.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 33(2), 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert, and Wodak, Ruth. 2007. Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
West-Pavlov, Russell. 2012. Temporalities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Guoguang. 1994. “Command communication: the politics of editorial formulation in the People's Daily.” The China Quarterly 137, 194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, Barbie. 1993. “Journalists as interpretive communities.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 10(3), 219–237.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Barbie. 2008. “Why memory's work on journalism does not reflect journalism's work on memory.” Memory Studies 1(1), 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar