Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:37:54.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical integration by systematic sampling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

P. A. P. Moran
Affiliation:
Institute of StatisticsOxford University

Extract

Recent investigations by F. Yates (1) in agricultural statistics suggest a mathematical problem which may be formulated as follows. A function f(x) is known to be of bounded variation and Lebesgue integrable on the range −∞ < x < ∞, and its integral over this range is to be determined. In default of any knowledge of the position of the non-negligible values of the function the best that can be done is to calculate the infinite sum

for some suitable δ and an arbitrary origin t, where s ranges over all possible positive and negative integers including zero. S is evidently of period δ in t and ranges over all its values as t varies from 0 to δ. Previous writers (Aitken (2), p. 45, and Kendall (3)) have examined the resulting errors for fixed t. (They considered only symmetrical functions, and supposed one of the lattice points to be located at the centre.) Here we do not restrict ourselves to symmetrical functions and consider the likely departure of S(t) from J (the required integral) when t is a random variable uniformly distributed in (0, δ). It will be shown that S(t) is distributed about J as mean value, with a variance which will be evaluated as a function of δ, the scale of subdivision.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Yates, F.Philos. Trans. A, 241 (1948), 345–77.Google Scholar
(2)Aitken, A. C.Statistical mathematics (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1939).Google Scholar
(3)Kendall, D. G.Quart. J. Math. 13 (1942), 172–84.Google Scholar
(4)Titchmarsh, E. C.Theory of Fourier integrals (Oxford, 1937).Google Scholar
(5)Kendall, D. G.Quart. J. Math. 19 (1948), 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar