Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:36:48.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Features of speech in German and US-American mother–toddler dyads during toy play and book-reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2019

Elena DOERING ,
Kevin SCHLUTER  and
Antje von SUCHODOLETZ Open the ORCID record for Antje von SUCHODOLETZ [Opens in a new window]
Elena DOERING
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Kevin SCHLUTER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Antje von SUCHODOLETZ*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
*
*Corresponding author: New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Psychology, PO Box 129188, Abu Dhabi, UAE. E-mail: avs5@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research indicates that features of speech during mother–toddler interactions are dependent on the situational context. In this study, we explored language samples of 69 mother–toddler dyads collected during standardized toy play and book-reading situations across two countries, Germany and the United States (US). The results showed that features of speech differed across situational contexts. However, situational differences were mostly found among the sample from the US but not from Germany. Few significant associations between mothers’ and toddlers’ language variables were found. Findings are discussed with regard to variations in language across situations and countries.

Keywords

languagemother–toddler interactionfeatures of speech
Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 47 , Special Issue 1: The Influence of Input Quality and Communicative Interaction on Language Development Part 1 , January 2020 , pp. 112 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

2

now at University of Osnabrueck, Germany

References

Barza, L. (2014). Home literacy practices of three ethno-cultural groups in the U.S.: a collective case study on culture and support for early reading. International Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 3(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassok, D., Latham, S., & Rorem, A. (2016). Is kindergarten the new first grade? AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415616358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Dale, P., & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In The handbook of Child Language. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631203124.1996.00005.xGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. (2000). Caregiver input in English and Korean: use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language, 27(1), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Durkin, K. (2012). Language development and assessment in the preschool period. Neuropsychology Review, 22(4), 384–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damast, A. M., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (1996). Mother–child play: sequential interactions and the relation between maternal beliefs and behaviors. Child Development, 67(4), 1752–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De la Rie, S., Van Steensel, R. C. M., van Gelderen, A. J. S., & Severiens, S. (2018). The role of type of activity in parent–child interactions within a family literacy programme: comparing prompting boards and shared reading. Early Child Development and Care, 188(8), 1076–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMaris, A., & Smith, A. B. (2017). Relationships among measures of longest utterances, MLU, age, and number of utterances in child language samples. Speech, Language, and Hearing, 20(2), 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeThorne, L. S., Johnson, B. W., & Loeb, J. W. (2005). A closer look at MLU: What does it really measure? Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(8), 635–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezeizabarrena, M., & Fernandez, I. G. (2018). Length of utterance, in morphemes or in words? MLU3-w, a reliable measure of language development in Early Basque. Frontiers in Physiology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02265Google ScholarPubMed
Harkness, S., Super, C., Bermudez, M. R., Moscardino, U., Rha, J.-R., Mavridis, C. J., … Olaf Zylicz, P. (2010). Parental ethnotheories of children's learning. In The Anthropology of Learning in Childhood.Google Scholar
Harris, J., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2011). Lessons from the crib for the classroom: how children really learn language. In Neuman, S. B. & Dickinson, D. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 49–60). New York: Guilford Publishers.Google Scholar
Hentschel, E., & Keller, H. (2006). Cultural concepts of parenting: a linguistic analysis. Linguistik Online, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.29.558Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26(1), 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1991). Mother–child conversation in different social classes and communicative settings. Child Development, 62(4), 782–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, N., Hadley, P. A., & Rispoli, M. (2017). Diversity matters: parent input predicts toddler verb production. Journal of Child Language, 44(1), 63–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, H., Borke, J., Lamm, B., Lohaus, A., & Yovsi, R. D. (2011). Developing patterns of parenting in two cultural communities. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 233–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H., & Demuth, C. (2006). Further explorations of the ‘Western mind’ Euro-American and German mother's and grandmothers’ ethnotheories. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.1.74Google Scholar
Keller, H., & Lamm, B. (2005). Parenting as the expression of sociohistorical time: the case of German individualization. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 238–46.Google Scholar
Keller, H., Lamm, B., Abels, M., Yovsi, R., Borke, J., Jensen, H., … Chaudhary, N. (2006). Cultural models, socialization goals, and parenting ethnotheories: a multicultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(2), 155–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langobardi, E., Spataro, P., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Noun and verb production in maternal and child language: continuity, stability, and prediction across the second year of life. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W., Farkas, G., Duncan, G. J., Burchinal, M. R., & Vandell, D. L. (2013). Timing of high-quality child care and cognitive, language, and preacademic development. Developmental Psychology, 49(8), 1440–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGregor, K., Munro, N., Chen, S. M., Baker, E., & Oleson, J. (2018). Cultural influences on the developing semantic lexicon. Journal of Child Language, 45, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melzi, G., Schick, A. R., & Kennedy, J. L. (2011). Narrative elaboration and participation: two dimensions of maternal elicitation style. Child Development, 82(4), 1282–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noble, C. H., Cameron-Faulkner, T., & Lieven, E. (2018). Keeping it simple: the grammatical properties of shared book reading. Journal of Child Language, 45(3), 753–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, B. A., Rowe, M. L., Singer, J. D., & Snow, C. E. (2005). Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Development, 76(4), 763–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Parker, M. D., & Brorson, K. (2005). A comparative study between mean length of utterance in morphemes (MLUm) and mean length of utterance in words (MLUw). First Language, 25(3), 365–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2008). Child-directed speech: relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, M. L., Leech, K. A., & Cabrera, N. (2017). Going beyond input quantity: wh-questions matter for toddlers’ language and cognitive development. Cognitive Science, 41, 162–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, M. L., Pan, B. A., & Ayoub, C. (2005). Predictors of variation in maternal talk to children: a longitudinal study of low-income families. Parenting, 5(3), 259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salo, V. C., Rowe, M. L., Leech, K. A., & Cabrera, N. J. (2016). Low-income fathers’ speech to toddlers during book reading versus toy play. Journal of Child Language, 43(6), 1385–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwab, J. F., Rowe, M. L., Cabrera, N., & Lew-Williams, C. (2018). Fathers’ repetition of words is coupled with children's vocabularies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 437–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sénéchal, M., Cornell, E. H., & Broda, L. S. (1995). Age-related differences in the organization of parent–infant interactions during picture-book reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10(3), 317–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snape, N., & Leung, Y. I. (2017). Simultaneous bilingualism. In Snape, N. & Kupisch, T. (Eds.), Second language acquisition: second language systems (pp. 193–4). London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderstrom, M., & Wittebolle, K. (2013). When do caregivers talk? The influences of activity and time of day on caregiver speech and child vocalizations in two childcare environments. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080646CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yont, K. M., Snow, C. E., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2003). The role of context in mother–child interactions: an analysis of communicative intents expressed during toy play and book reading with 12-month-olds. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(3), 435–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar