Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:12:52.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universalist Assumptions and Implications of Comparative Law: Should They be Deconstructed?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Anne Peters
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Culture
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 93 , 1999 , pp. 366 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rothacker, Erich, Die vergleichende Methode in den Geisteswissenschaften, 60 Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 13 (1957)Google Scholar, at 15. Translation by author. Emphasis added.

2 Saleilles, Raymond, Conception et objet de la science juridique du droit comparé, in Procés Verbaux et Documents Du Congrès International De Droit Comparé (Paris 1900)Google Scholar. 2 vols. (1905-1907), Vol. I, p. 167, at 173.

3 Zwigert, Konrad & Kötz, Hein, Introduction to Comparative Law—The Framework, p. 34 (Weir, Tony, trans. Clarendon Press, Oxford 3d ed. 1998)Google Scholar (1969). Emphasis added.

4 Karl R. Popper, The Myth of the Framework, in Id., The Myth of the Framework: in Defence of Science and Rationality p. 33 at 60-61 (1994).