Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:22:17.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introductory Remarks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

G. Richard Tucker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Research within the domain of applied linguistics is at the moment lively and vigorous. Exciting work is being conducted in many settings by scholars trained in diverse areas of specialization. Certainly the inclusion of separate strands in (at least) psycholinguistics and sociolinguistics is now obligatory in most graduate programs in linguistics, bilingual education, foreign language education, or English as a second or foreign language, whereas the subjects were just beginning to be introduced two decades ago. The vitality of the Linguistic Society of America (LSA), the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL), Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) and other organizations bodes well for the strength of our discipline. Annual or semi-annual meetings of each of these groups are well attended and offer broad, stimulating programs for participants. These organizations directly or indirectly sponsor a range of scholarly publications widely distributed to a broad membership.

Type
Introductory Essay
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 5 , March 1984 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Unannotated Bibliography

Allwright, D. 1983. Classroom-centered research on language teaching and learning: A brief historical overview. TESOL quarterly. 17.191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., and Mattheier, K. J. (eds.) Forthcoming. Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society. Berlin: Walter deGruyter.Google Scholar
Bahrick, H. P. 1984. Fifty years of second language attrition: Implications for progammatic research. Modern language journal. 68.105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L. M. and Giles, H. 1984. Speech-accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International journal of the sociology of language. 46.5–32.Google Scholar
California State Department of Education. 1983. Studies on immersion education: A collection for United States educators. Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.Google Scholar
Chamot, A. U. 1983. Toward a functional ESL curriculum in the elementary school. TESOL quarterly. 17.459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. L. D. 1983. Language testing: Past and current status--directions for the future. Modern language journal. 67.431–443.Google Scholar
Clark, J. L. D. and Jorden, E. H.. 1984. A study of language attrition in former U.S. students of Japanese and implications for design of curriculum and teaching materials. Final report to the Japan-United States Friendship Commission. Washington, DC: Japan-United States Friendship Commission.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. L. (ed.) 1982. Language spread: Studies in diffusion and social change. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Copeland, J. E. (ed.) 1984. New directions in linguistics and semiotics. Houston, TX: Rice University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, J. 1984. The relationship between sociolinguistics and language teaching. Paper presented at the Defense Language Institute, Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
d'Anglejan, A. (ed.) 1983. Native speaker reactions to approximative systems. Studies in second language acquisition. 5. [Special issue.]Google Scholar
Eisenstein, M. R. 1983. Language variation and the ESL curriculum. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (ed.) 1984. The decade past, the decade to come. International journal of the sociology of language. 45. [10th anniversary issue.]Google Scholar
Ford, C. E. 1984. The influence of speech variety on teachers' evaluation of students with comparable academic ability. TESOL quarterly. 18.25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaies, S. J. 1983. The investigation of language classroom processes. TESOL quarterly. 17.205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., and MacPherson, J. 1983. Social factors in second-language attrition: An initial investigation. London, Ontario, Canada: University of Western Ontario. [Research Bulletin No. 584.]Google Scholar
Genesee, F. 1983. Bilingual education of majority-language children: The immersion experiments in review. Applied psycholinguistics. 4.1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., Rogers, P., and Holobow, N. 1983. The social psychology of second language learning: Another point of view. Language learning. 33.209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. and Edwards, J. (eds.) 1983. Language attitudes in multilingual settings. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development. 4. [Special issue.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, G. A., Stansfield, C. W., and Duran, R. P. 1984. A comprehensive TOEFL bibliography, 1963-1982. Modern language journal. 68.45–51.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1984. Linguistics in the university: The question of social accountability. In Copeland, J. E. (ed.) New directions in linguistics and semiotics. Houston, TX: Rice University. 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, G. 1983. Oral proficiency testing: Comparative validities of interview, imitation, and completion methods. Language learning. 33.315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, T. V. (ed.) 1983. Teaching for proficiency: The organizing principle. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.Google Scholar
Homburg, T. J. 1984. Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? TESOL quarterly. 18.87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. B. et al. , (eds.) 1984. Annual review of applied linguistics IV. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Krahnke, K. J. and Christison, M. A. 1983. Recent language research and some language teaching principles. TESOL quarterly. 17.625–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, R. D. 1984. Beyond growth: The next stage in language and area studies. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities.Google Scholar
Lambert, R. D. and Freed, B. F. (eds.) 1982. The loss of language skills. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. 1983. Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL quarterly. 17.358–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., and McLeod, B. 1983. Second Language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language learning. 33.135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omaggio, A. C. 1983a. Methodology in transition: The new focus on proficiency. Modern language journal. 67.330–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omaggio, A. C. 1983b. Proficiency-oriented classroom testing. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Perkins, K. 1983. On the use of composition scoring techniques, objective measures, and objective tests to evaluate ESL writing ability. TESOL quarterly. 17.651–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E. 1983. Rater reliability in the oral interview speaking test. Foreign language annals. 16.219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, D. A. (ed.) 1983. Literacy and ethnicity. International journal of the sociology of language. 42. [Special issue.]Google Scholar
Weber, R. M. 1984. Reading: United States. In Kaplan, R. B. et al. , (eds.) Annual review of applied linguistics IV. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 111–123.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. A., Christian, D., and Hatfield, D. 1983. Adolescent and young adult English of Vietnamese refugees. Final report to National Institute of Education. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Wyatt, D. H. (ed.) 1983. Computer-assisted language instruction. [Special issue of System. 11.1.]Google Scholar