Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:47:19.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening of anaerobic gut fungi using a pressure transducer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

W.-Y. Zhu
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB
M. K. Theodorou
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB
B. B. Nielsen
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB School of Biological Sciences, 1800 Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL
A. P. J. Trinci
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, 1800 Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL
Get access

Extract

The growth of gut anaerobic fungi is usually determined in batch culture by gravimetric measurements of dry-matter (DM) loss, or by quantification of fermentation end-products (Lowe et al., 1987). These techniques involve destructive sampling of the cultures and require many replicate cultures in time-course experiments. Moreover, techniques using DM loss are only able to measure the end-point of degradation of substrate and cannot follow the growth over the entire fermentation period. Using a pressure transducer, Theodorou et al. (1994) developed a simple and sensitive gas production procedure to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant foods. This procedure can also be used to follow the growth of anaerobic fungi on soluble and particulate substrate in batch cultures Theodorou et al. (1995).

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

France, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Theodorou, M. K., Lister, S. J., Davies, R. D. and Isaac, D. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal of Theoretical Biology 163: 99111.Google Scholar
Gordon, G. L. R. and Phillips, M. W. 1989. Degradation and utilization of cellulose and straw by three different anaerobic fungi from the ovine rumen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 55: 17031710.Google Scholar
Lowe, S. E., Theodorou, M. K. and Trinci, A. P. J. 1987. Growth and fermentation of an anaerobic fungus on various carbon sources and effect of temperature on development. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53: 12101215.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. B. 1996. A study of survival, growth and enzyme production in anaerobic fungi. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Theodorou, M. K., Davies, R. D., Nielsen, B. B., Lawrence, M. I. G. and Trinci, A. P. J. 1995. Determination of growth of anaerobic fungi on soluble and cellulosic substrates using pressure transducer. Microbiology 141: 671678.Google Scholar
Theodorou, M. K., Williams, B. A., Dhanoa, M. S., McAllan, A. B. and France, J. 1994. A simple gas production method using pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48: 185197.Google Scholar
Webb, J. and Theodorou, M. K. 1991. Neocallimastix hurleyensis sp nov., an anaerobic fungus from the ovine rumen. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 12201224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, W.- Y., Theodorou, M. K., Longland, A. C., Nielsen, B. B., Dijkstra, J. and Trinci, A. P. J. 1996. Growth and survival of anaerobic fungi in batch and continuous-flow cultures. Anaerobe 2: 2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar