Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:19:21.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research and development implications for the future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

P. N. Wilson  and
A. B. Lawrence
P. N. Wilson
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
A. B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Extract

Choice of breed

A model should be developed to allow the selection of the optimal breed on the basis of production traits and economic efficiency.

Choice of selection method

New breeding schemes to replace the current widespread use of progeny testing should be examined critically and, in particular, breeding schemes incorporating multiple ovulation and embryo transplant should be assessed.

Identification of marker traits

Research to evaluate the relevance of marker traits to milk quality should be pursued.

Genetical engineering

Long-term prospects of applying genetical engineering techniques to cattle should be assessed in terms of desk studies.

Nutritional manipulation of milk fat

The biochemical and metabolic aspects of lipid protection in the rumen should be examined further.

Nutritional manipulation of milk protein

Further studies should be undertaken to examine the effects and possible benefits of protein and specific amino acid protection.

New milk products

Work should be conducted to increase the range of marketable products of high added value, particularly new types of cheese for export.

Alleged relationship between milk fat and coronary heart disease (CHD)

The alleged causal relationship between dietary fat and CHD should be examined critically, particularly the definition of safe levels of serum cholestrol in man.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 9: Milk Compositional Quality and Its Importance in Future Markets , 1984 , pp. 95 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Alhassan, W. S., Krabill, L. F. and Satter, L. D. 1969. Manipulation of the ruminal fermentation. I. Effect of sodium sulfite on bovine ruminal fatty acid concentration and milk composition. J. Dairy Sci. 52: 376–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anonymous. 1984a. First Scots feta cheese Iran-bound. Fmrs' Wkly 100(2): 32.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1984b. Cholesterol: the killer is convicted. New Scient. 101(1393): 8.Google Scholar
Bailie, J. H. 1982. The influence of breeding management efficiency on dairy herd performance. Anim. Prod. 34: 315–323.Google Scholar
Bowman, J. 1977. Priorities in agricultural research. J. agric. Econ. 28: 233–242.Google Scholar
Brigstocke, T. D. A., Lindeman, M. A., Cuthbert, N. H., Wilson, P. N. and Cole, J. P. L. 1981. The dry-matter intake of Jersey cows. Anim. Prod. 32: 366 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Brinster, R. L., Chen, H. Y., Warren, R., Sarthy, A. and Palmiter, R. D. 1982. Regulation of metallothionein-thymidine kinase fusion plasmids injected into mouse eggs. Nature, Lond. 296: 39–42.Google Scholar
Burnside, E. B., Schaeffer, L. R. and Kennedy, B. W. 1982. Design, structure and economics of a national dairy cattle development scheme. Proc. 2nd Wld Congr. Genet. Appl Livest. Prod., Madrid, Session 6, pp. 357–369.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. G. 1977. Comparative dairy production of Jerseys and Friesian-Jersey crossbreds. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 37: 25–31.Google Scholar
Centre for Agricultural Strategy. 1978. A Strategy for the UK Dairy Industry, Rep. 4. Centre for Agricultural Strategy, Reading.Google Scholar
Centre for Agricultural Strategy. 1980. The Efficiency of British Agriculture, Rep. 7. Centre for Agricultural Strategy, Reading.Google Scholar
Clark, J. H. 1975. Lactational responses to postruminal administration of proteins and amino acids. J. Dairy Sci. 58: 1178–1197.Google Scholar
Crossley, G. 1984. CI milk looks set for a big revival. Fmrs' Wkly 100(2): 42.Google Scholar
Cunningham, E. P. 1974. The aims of breeding dairy cattle. Proc. 1st Wld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Madrid, Session 4, pp. 531–539.Google Scholar
Dastur, N. N. 1956. Buffaloes' milk and milk products. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 18: 967–1008.Google Scholar
Derrig, R. G., Clark, J. H. and Davis, C. L. 1974. Effect of abomasal infusion of sodium caseinate on milk yield, nitrogen utilization and amino acid nutrition of the dairy cow. J. Nutr. 104: 151–159.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P., Gibson, D. and Russell, W. S. 1977. Estimations of heterosis in crossbred dairy cattle. Anim. Prod. 25: 193–208.Google Scholar
Dunkley, W. L., Smith, N. E. and Franke, A. A. 1977. Effects of feeding protected tallow on composition of milk and milk fat. J. Dairy Sci. 60: 1863–1869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edinburgh School of Agriculture. 1983. Genetic improvement of dairy cows. A. Rep. Edinb. Sch. Agric, 1982, pp. 31–36.Google Scholar
El-Negoumy, A. M. 1974. Effect of polymorphism on casein stability in salt solutions of varying complexity before and after freezing. J. Dairy Sci. 57: 1170–1176.Google Scholar
Federation of United Kingdom Milk Marketing Boards. 1981. United Kingdom Dairy Facts & Figures. Federation of United Kingdom Milk Marketing Boards, Thames Ditton, Surrey.Google Scholar
Fogerty, A. C. and Johnson, A. R. 1980. Influence of nutritional factors on the yield and content of milk Future Research and Development fat: protected polyunsaturated fat in the diet. In Factors Affecting the Yields and Contents of Milk Constituents of Commercial Importance, Bull. int. Dairy Fed., Docum. 125, pp. 96–104.Google Scholar
Folman, Y., Neumark, H., Kaim, M. and Kaufmann, W. 1981. Performance, rumen and blood metabolites in high-yielding cows fed varying protein percents and protected soybean. J. Dairy Sci. 64: 759–768.Google Scholar
Gahne, B. 1982. Use of additional traits in dairy cattle breeding. Proc. 2nd Wld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Madrid, Session 6, pp. 387–398.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. P. 1984. Efficiency of food conversion for milk production in British Friesian and Jersey cattle. Proc. Br. Cattle Breed. Club, Winter Conf. Google Scholar
Gibson, D. and Russell, W. S. 1978. The performance of crossbred dairy cattle. What are their commercial merits? Rep. Anim. Breed. Res. Orgn, pp. 29–34.Google Scholar
Glueck, C. J. and Connor, W. E. 1978. Diet-coronary heart disease relationships reconnoitered. Am. J. clin. Nutr. 31: 727–737.Google Scholar
Gordon, T. 1970. The Framingham Diet Study: diet and the regulation of serum cholesterol. In The Framingham Study: An Epidemiological Investigation of Cardiovascular Disease (ed. Kannel, W. B. and Gordon, T.), Section 24. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Groves, C. R. 1982. The marketing of milk and milk products in the United Kingdom—a review and assessment. Mkting Rep. West Scotl. Agric. Coll., No. 1. Google Scholar
Harper, A. E. 1983. Coronary heart disease—an epidemic related to diet? Am. J. clin. Nutr. 37: 669–681.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. G. and Bowden, D. M. 1971. Correlated genetic responses of feed efficiency, growth, and body size in cattle selected for milk solids yield. J. Dairy Sci. 54: 1848–1855.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G., Edwards, M. R., Ahmed, M.-K. A. and Thompson, R. 1983. Heritability of milk yield and composition at different levels and variability of production. Anim. Prod. 36: 59–68.Google Scholar
Hind, E. 1978. Efficiency of lean meat production by British Friesian and Jersey steers. Anim. Prod. 27: 181–189.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. 1978. Alternative breeding schemes for dairy cattle. Rep. Anim. Breed. Res. Orgn, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. J. M. 1983. Breeding Dairy Cattle. Farming Press, Ipswich.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. 1980. Protein degradation and synthesis within the reticulo-rumen in relation to milk protein synthesis. In Factors Affecting the Yields and Contents of Milk Constituents of Commercial Importance, Bull. int. Dairy Fed., Docum. 125, pp. 152–158.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. and Lüpping, W. 1982. Protected proteins and protected amino acids for ruminants. In Protein Contribution of Feedstuffs for Ruminants: Application to Feed Formulation (ed. Miller, E. L., Pike, I. H. and van Es, A. J. H.), pp. 36–75. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B. 1977. An introduction to cattle breeding in Britain. Proc. ASCAR Cattle Breed. Symp., Edinb. Google Scholar
Land, R. B. 1981. An alternative philosophy for livestock breeding. Livestock Prod. Sci. 8: 95–99.Google Scholar
Land, R. B., Osmond, T. J. and Tilakaratne, N. 1980. Physiological prediction of the dairy merit of bulls. Rep. Anim. Breed. Res. Orgn, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
McDowell, R. E. and McDaniel, B. T. 1968. Interbreed matings in dairy cattle. III. Economic aspects. J. Dairy Sci. 51: 1649–1658.Google Scholar
Maijala, K. and Hanna, M. 1974. Reliable phenotypic and genetic parameters in dairy cattle. Proc. 1st Wld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Madrid, Session 1, pp. 541–563.Google Scholar
Mepham, T. B. 1976. The Secretion of Milk. Studies in Biology, No. 60. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Milk Marketing Board. 1983. The New Pricing Package. Milk Marketing Board, Thames Ditton, Surrey.Google Scholar
Munro, G. L. 1978. Effect of genetic variants of milk proteins on yield and composition of milk. Brief Communs 20th int. Dairy Congr., Paris, p. 10.Google Scholar
Neilson, D. R. and Whittemore, C. T. 1981. Backfat area changes in high-yielding dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 32: 363 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Neufeld, H. N. and Goldbourt, U. 1983. Coronary heart disease: genetic aspects. Circulation 67: 943–954.Google Scholar
Nicholas, F. W. and Smith, C. 1983. Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splitting. Anim. Prod. 36: 341–353.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1982. Recent advances in knowledge of protein evaluation for ruminants. In Protein Contribution of Feedstuffs for Ruminants: Application to Feed Formulation (ed. Miller, E. L., Pike, I. H. and van Es, A. J. H.), pp. 1–3. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. E., Miller, R. H., Smith, J. W., Fulton, L. A., Rothschild, M. F., Balaine, D. S. and Coffey, E. M. 1981. Single and multiple trait sire selection. First lactation milk yield and composition, conformation, feed intake, efficiency, and net income. J. Dairy Sci. 64: 77–86.Google Scholar
Porter, J. W. G. 1980. The role of milk and milk constituents in the human diet. In Factors Affecting the Yields and Contents of Milk Constituents of Commercial Importance, Bull. int. Dairy Fed., Docum. 125, pp. 14–21.Google Scholar
Reiser, R. 1978. Oversimplification of dietxoronary heart disease relationships and exaggerated diet recommendations. Am. J. clin. Nutr. 31: 865–875.Google Scholar
Rendel, J. 1981. US Holsteins show highest yield of all participating countries. World Anim. Rev., No. 41, p. 6.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. 1982. Genetics engineering in animal improvement. Prod., 2nd Wld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Madrid, Session 6, pp. 145–159.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. and Thomas, P. C. 1980. Principles involved in manipulating the yields and concentrations of the constituents of milk. In Factors Affecting the Yields and Contents of Milk Constituents of Commercial Importance, Bull. int. Dairy. Fed., Docum. 125, pp. 66–72.Google Scholar
Schwab, C. G., Satter, L. D. and Clay, A. B. 1976. Response of lactating dairy cows to abomasal infusion of amino acids. J. Dairy Sci. 59: 1254–1270.Google Scholar
Skjervold, H. 1974. Introduction (Dairy Cattle Plenary Session) . Proc. 1st Wld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Madrid, Session 1, pp. 523–530.Google Scholar
Stamler, J. 1982. Diet and coronary heart disease. Biometrics, Suppl. 38, pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
Steane, D. E. 1977. Performance testing dairy bulls. Proc. ASCAR Cattle Breed. Symp., Edinb. Google Scholar
Storry, J. E. 1980. Influence of nutritional factors on the yield and content of milk fat: non-protected fat in the diet. In Factors Affecting the Yields and Contents of Milk Constituents of Commercial Importance, Bull. int. Dairy Fed., Docum. 125, pp. 88–95.Google Scholar
Storry, J. E. 1981. The effect of dietary fat on milk composition. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition—1981 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 3–33. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Storry, J. E., Brumby, P. E. and Dunkley, W. L. 1980. Influence of nutritional factors on the yield and content of milk fat: protected non-polyunsaturated fat in the diet. In Factors Affecting the Yields and Contents of Milk Constituents of Commercial Importance, Bull. int. Dairy Fed., Docum. 125, pp. 105–125.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. 1980. Influence of nutritional factors on the yield and content of milk fat: dietary components other than fat. In Factors Affecting the Yields and Contents of Milk Constituents of Commercial Importance, Bull. int. Dairy Fed., Docum. 125, pp. 126–134.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Broster, W. H., Schuller, E., Smith, T. and Napper, D. J. 1977. Long-term effect of level of intake and diet composition on the performance of lactating dairy cows. 3. Milk composition and rumen fermentation. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 36: 147A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Taylor, R. 1983. Go on, butter-fat them up! Better Manage. 53: 1–2.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. 1980. Influence of nutrition on the yield and content of protein in milk: dietary protein and energy supply. In Factors Affecting the Yields and Contents of Milk Constituents of Commercial Importance, Bull. int. Dairy Fed., Docum. 125, pp. 142–151.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. L. 1981. Trends in milk flavors. J. Dairy Sci. 64: 1023–1027.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Rook, J. A. F. 1977. Manipulation of rumen fermentation. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition —1977 (ed Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 83–109. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Turton, J. D. 1981. Crossbreeding of dairy cattle—a selective review. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 49: 293–300.Google Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H., Pike, I. H. and Miller, E. L. 1982. Summary of discussion. In Protein Contribution of Feedstuffs for Ruminants: Application to Feed Formulation (ed. Miller, E. L., Pike, I. H. and van Es, A. J. H.), pp. 146–152. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Ward, K., Sleigh, M. J., Powell, B. C. and Rogers, G. E. 1982. The isolation and analysis of the major wool keratin gene families. Proc. 2nd Wld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Session 6, pp. 146–153.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Brigstocke, T. D. A. 1981. Improved Feeding of Cattle and Sheep: a Practical Guide to Modern Concepts of Ruminant Nutrition. Granada Publishing, London.Google Scholar
Wood, F. W., Murphy, M. F. and Dunkley, W. L. 1975. Influence of elevated polyunsaturated fatty acids on processing and physical properties of butter. J. Dairy Sci. 58: 839–845.Google Scholar
Wright, K. 1983. Securing the future. Better Manage. 53: 5.Google Scholar