Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T10:54:38.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ideography, Blissymbolics, standardization, and emergent conformity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2023

Harry Howard*
Affiliation:
Department of Spanish & Portuguese, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA howard@tulane.edu; https://www2.tulane.edu/~h0Ward/

Abstract

There is an extensive literature on the usage of Blissymbolics in augmentative and alternative communication that contradicts Morin's contention that it fails as an ideography. Morin's notion of “standardization” (target article, sect. X, para. X) is at odds with the highly developed understanding of this notion in linguistics. What Morin seems to have in mind corresponds to the notion of emergence in iterative and multiagent models of language learning.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, F. (2020). Global aphasia and the language of thought. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 35(1), 927.Google Scholar
Beck, A., & Fritz, H. (1998). Can people who have aphasia learn iconic codes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(3), 184196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burroughs, J. A., Albritton, E., Eaton, B., & Montague, J. (1990). A comparative study of language delayed preschool children's ability to recall symbols from two symbol systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6(3), 202206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, S., & Shen, Y. (1998). Semantic transparency and translucency in compound Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(3), 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. R. (1981). Learning words using traditional orthography and the symbols of Rebus, Bliss, and Carrier. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46(2), 191196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ecklund, S., & Reichle, J. (1987). A comparison of normal children's ability to recall symbols from two logographic systems. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18(1), 3440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funnell, E., & Allport, A. (1989). Symbolically speaking: Communicating with Blissymbols in aphasia. Aphasiology, 3, 279300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966a). Dialect, language nation. American Anthropologist, 68(6), 922935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, E. (1966b). Language conflict and language planning: The case of modern Norwegian. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S., Griffiths, T., & Smith, K. (2014). Iterated learning and the evolution of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 28, 108114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morin, O., Kelly, P., & Winters, J. (2020). Writing, graphic codes, and asynchronous communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(2), 727743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muter, P. (1986). Blissymbolics, cognition, and the handicapped (9, Trans.). In Hjelmquist, E. & Nilsson, L.-G. (Eds.), Communication and handicap: Aspects of psychological compensation and technical aid.Google Scholar
Okrent, A. (2010). In the land of invented languages: Esperanto rock stars, Klingon poets, Loglan lovers, and the mad dreamers who tried to build a perfect language. Random House.Google Scholar
Poupart, A., Trudeau, N., & Sutton, A. (2013). Construction of graphic symbol sequences by preschool-aged children: Learning, training, and maintenance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(1), 91109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Mol, M. (2003). Variation in modern standard Arabic in radio news broadcasts: A synchronic descriptive investigation into the use of complementary particles. Peeters.Google Scholar
Wood, C., Storr, J., & Reich, P. (1992). Blissymbol reference guide. Blissymbolics Communication International.Google Scholar