Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:31:07.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘We get that’: Narrative indexicality and the construction of frustration in police stories about domestic violence victim/survivors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Jennifer Andrus Open the ORCID record for Jennifer Andrus [Opens in a new window]  and
Nicole Clawson
Jennifer Andrus*
Affiliation:
University of Utah, USA
Nicole Clawson
Affiliation:
University of Utah, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Jennifer Andrus, Associate Professor, University of Utah, Department of Writing and Rhetoric Studies, Languages & Communication Bldg., 255 S. Central Dr., RM 3700, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA j.andrus@utah.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers a particular set of cultural and ideological discourses—police discourse about domestic violence (DV) victim/survivors—in a study about indexicality. Via the processes of indexicality, victim/survivors are consistently described and constructed as frustrations for police officers and police work. We pinpoint two sociosemantic structures that index frustration—the use of the word frustration and statements that initially show understanding for the victim/survivors’ situation—and then mitigate that understanding with stories about being frustrated. In the process, we argue, DV victim/survivors become indexical forms that index the social meaning that victim/survivors are frustrating rather than compliant. Further, we show how such constructions are available for reiteration by different speakers in police discourse and different contexts. The linguistic features that signal ‘frustration’ thus function in police discourse as indexical features that can be accessed and animated by police officers when they describe encounters with victim/survivors and the victim/survivors themselves. (Indexicality, narrative, police discourse, domestic violence)*

Type
Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , April 2024 , pp. 239 - 260
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrus, Jennifer (2020a). Entextualizing and contextualizing the status quo in domestic violence narratives. Narrative Inquiry 31(2):263–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrus, Jennifer (2020b). Narratives of domestic violence: Policing, identity, and indexicality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Dawn (2000). The domestic violence sourcebook. Los Angeles, CA: Lowell House.Google Scholar
Blair, Janet; Fowler, Katherine; Betz, Carter; & Baumgardner, Jason (2016). Occupational homicides of law enforcement officers, 2003–2013: Data from the National Violent Death Reporting System. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 51(5):S188–S196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blommaert, Jan (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 2(2):115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breul, Nick, & Luongo, Desiree (2018). Making it safer: An analysis of U.S. law enforcement fatalities between 2010–2016. Online: https://cops.usdoj.gov/RIC/Publications/cops-w0858-pub.pdf.Google Scholar
Champion, David (2017). Policing as myth: Narrative and integral approaches to police identity and culture. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 10(1):1–13.Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia (2002). She say, she go, she be like: Verbs of quotation over time in African American Vernacular English. American Speech 77(1):3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dailey-O'Cain, Jennifer (2000). The sociolinguistic distribution of and attitudes toward focuser like and quotative like. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(1):60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arcy, Alexandra (2007). Like and language ideology: Disentangling fact from fiction. American Speech 82(4):386–419.10.1215/00031283-2007-025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette (2018). Personae and phonetic detail in sociolinguistic signs. Language in Society 47(4):513–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, Mercedes; Haddican, Bill; Zweig, Eytan; Johnson, Daniel; Baker, Zipporah; Cockeram, David; Danks, Esther; & Tyler, Louise (2012). Constant linguistic effects in the diffusion of be like. Journal of English Linguistics 40(4):316–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen, & Bell, Barbara (1995). Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of be + like. American Speech 70(3):265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Connie (1991). The police war story and the narrative of inequality. Discourse & Society 2(3):297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Joel, & Clemmer, Elizabeth (1986). Danger to police in domestic disturbances—A new look. National Institute of Justice: Research in Brief, November, 1–8. Online: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/102634NCJRS.pdf.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Susan; Zhang, Yan; Hayes, Brittany; & Bills, Matthew (2020). Mandatory arrest for domestic violence and repeat offending: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior 53:101430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Richard (2004). Police officer frustrations about handling domestic violence calls. The Police Journal 77(3):207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (2008). Discourse analysis. 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaminski, Robert, & Sorensen, David (1995). A multivariate analysis of individual, situational and environmental factors associated with police assault injuries. American Journal of Police 14(3/4):3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kercher, Cassandra; Swedler, David; Pollack, Keshia; & Webster, Daniel (2013). Homicides of law enforcement officers responding to domestic disturbance calls. Injury Prevention 19(5):331–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtz, Don, & Upton, Lindsey (2017). War stories and occupying soldiers: A narrative approach to understanding police culture and community conflict. Critical Criminology 25(4):539–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (n.d.). Learn more. Online: https://ncadv.org/learn-more.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald (2001). You're like ‘why not?’: The quotative expressions of Glasgow adolescents. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(1):3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Susan (1999). Police force or police service? Gender and emotional labor. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 561(1):111–26.10.1177/000271629956100108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (2012). Experiencing language. Anthropological Theory 12(2):142–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles (1940). Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In Justus Buchler (ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce, 98–119. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai; Maegaard, Marie; Møller, Janus S., & Kristiansen, Tore (2014). Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43(1):1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey; & Svartvik, Jan (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne, & Lange, Deborah (1995). The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66(3):227–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4):193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2005). Axes of evals. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, & D'Arcy, Alex (2004). He's like, she's like: The quotative system in Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(4):493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, & D'Arcy, Alex, &Hudson, Rachel (1999). Be like et al. beyond America: The quotative system in British and Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(2):147–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinch, Shonna (2001). The advocate as gatekeeper: The limits of politeness in protective order interviews with Latina survivors of domestic abuse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4):475–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinch, Shonna (2016). De-authorizing rape narrators. Exploring Language Aggression Against Women 86:37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard, & Tao, Hongyin (2007). A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English. Sociolinguistic Studies 1(2):241–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar