Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:22:26.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allelopathic Effects of Lantana (Lantana camara) on Milkweedvine (Morrenia odorata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Nagi Reddy Achhireddy  and
Megh Singh
Nagi Reddy Achhireddy
Affiliation:
Univ. of Florida, IFAS, Citrus Res. and Educ. Ctr., Lake Alfred, FL 33850
Megh Singh
Affiliation:
Univ. of Florida, IFAS, Citrus Res. and Educ. Ctr., Lake Alfred, FL 33850
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Allelopathic effects of lantana (Lantana camara L. ♯3 LANCA) residues (root, shoot), foliar leachates, and the soil (where lantana was grown) on milkweedvine (Morrenia odorata Lindl. ♯3 MONOD) seed germination and growth over a 30-day period were examined. Foliar leachates or the soil collected from the field where lantana had been growing had no effect on the final germination percentage or the seedling growth of milkweedvine. Incorporation of dried lantana shoot or root material into soil had no effect on the final percentage germination but caused significant reductions in milkweedvine growth over a 30-day test period. Roots were more inhibitory than shoots. Fifty percent of milkweedvine seedlings died within 15 days after germination at 1% (w/w) dried lantana root incorporation into the soil, and higher concentrations increased seedling death. Lantana roots incorporated into the soil produced foliar symptoms such as wilting and desiccation, whereas lantana shoots incorporated into the soil produced yellowing of the foliage of milkweedvine. Allelopathic activity of lantana residues was still strong even after decomposition of lantana residues for 4 weeks prior to the planting of milkweedvine seeds.

Keywords

AllelopathygerminationLANCAMONOD
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 6 , November 1984 , pp. 757 - 761
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. AlSaadawi, I. S. and Rice, E. L. 1982. Allelopathic effects of Polygonum aviculare L. I. Vegetational patterning. J. Chem. Ecol. 8:993–1009.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, R., Katz, A. J., and Anderson, M. R. 1978. Allelopathy as a factor in the success of Helianthus mollis Lam. J. Chem. Ecol. 4:9–16.Google Scholar
3. Bell, D. T. and Koeppe, D. E. 1972. Noncompetitive effects of giant foxtail on the growth of corn. Agron. J. 64:321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Brown, R. L., Tang, C. S., and Nishimoto, R. K. 1983. Growth inhibition from guava root exudates. HortScience 18:316–318.Google Scholar
5. Colton, C. E. and Einhellig, F. A. 1980. Allelopathic mechanishms of velvetleaf (Abutelon theophrasti Medic., Malvaceae) on soybean. Am. J. Bot. 67:1407–1413.Google Scholar
6. DeCandolle, M. A. P. 1832. Physiologie Vegetale. III. Bechet Jeune. Lib. Fac. Med., Paris. 1474 pp.Google Scholar
7. Habeck, D. H. 1976. The case for biological control of lantana in Florida citrus groves. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 89:17–18.Google Scholar
8. Hardin, J. W. and Arena, J. M. 1974. Human Poisoning from Native and Cultivated Plants, 2nd ed. Duke Univ. Press, Durham, NC. 194 pp.Google Scholar
9. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Pages 299–302 in The Worlds' Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. The Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
10. Leather, G. R. 1983. Sunflowers are allelopathic to weeds. Weed Sci. 31:37–42.Google Scholar
11. Lehle, F. R., Frans, R., and McClelland, M. 1983. Allelopathic potential of Hope white lupine (Lupinus albus) herbage and herbage extracts. Weed Sci. 31:513–519.Google Scholar
12. Morton, J. F. 1971. Plants Poisonous to People in Florida and Other Warm Areas. Hurricane House, Miami. 116 pp.Google Scholar
13. Newman, E. I. and Rovira, A. D. 1975. Allelopathy among some British grassland species. J. Ecol. 63:727–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Phillips, R. L. and Tucker, D. P. H. 1970. Milkweed vine control in Florida citrus groves. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 83:26–29.Google Scholar
15. Phillips, R. L. and Tucker, D. P. H. 1976. Evaluation of herbicides for lantana control in citrus groves. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 89:19–20.Google Scholar
16. Putnam, A. R. and Duke, W. B. 1978. Allelopathy in agroecosystems. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 16:431–451.Google Scholar
17. Rasmussen, J. A. and Rice, E. L. 1971. Allelopathic effects of Sporobolus pyramidatus on vegetational patterning. Am. Midl. Nat. 86:309–326.Google Scholar
18. Rice, E. L. 1974. Allelopathy. Academic Press, New York. 353 pp.Google Scholar
19. Rice, E. L. 1979. Allelopathy–an update. Bot. Rev. 45:17–109.Google Scholar
20. Schon, M. K. and Einhellig, F. A. 1982. Allelopathic effects of cultivated sunflower on grain sorghum. Bot. Gaz. 143:505–510.Google Scholar
21. Tames, R. S., Gesto, M. D. V., and Vieitez, E. 1973. Growth substances isolated from tubers of Cyperus esculentus var. aureus . Physiol. Plant. 28:195–200.Google Scholar
22. Wilson, R. E. and Rice, E. L. 1968. Allelopathy as expressed by Helianthus annuus and its role in old field succession. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 95:423–448.Google Scholar