Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:28:20.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost of Biological Control of Weeds by Insects in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. Harris
P. Harris*
Affiliation:
Biol. Control, Agric. Canada, Res. Stn., Box 440, Regina Saskatchewan, Canada, S4P 3A2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to permit the calculation of prospective costs before starting the biological control of a weed. The cost of the Canadian program from its start in 1950 to the end of 1976 was tabulated in scientist-years by target weed, agent, and the type of study done. This information and international data on the number of agents required to control a weed were used to calculate expected costs. A complete biological control program is likely to cost 18.8–23.7 scientist-years or currently $1.2 to 1.5 million and thus is only economic for use against major weeds. However, it is often possible to capitalize on studies done elsewhere, and under these circumstances biological control may be economic for solving more minor weed problems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , March 1979 , pp. 242 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andres, L. A. 1977. The economics of biological control of weeds. Agn. Bot. 3:111–123.Google Scholar
2. Berube, D. 1978. Larval descriptions and biology of Tephritis dilacerata (Diptera:Tephritidae), a candidate for the biocontrol of Sonchus arvensis in Canada. Entomophaga 23:69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Berube, D. 1978. The basis for host plant specificity in Tephritis dilacerata and T. formosa (Diptera:Tephritidae), a candidate for the biocontrol of Sonchus arvensis in Canada. Entomophaga (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bucher, G. E. and Harris, P. 1961. Food plant spectrum and elimination of disease of cinnabar moth larvae, Hypocrita jacobaeae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) . Can. Entomol. 93:931–936.Google Scholar
5. Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the natural control of ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.) J. Ecol. 23:265–322.Google Scholar
6. Darwent, A. L., Lobay, W., Yarish, W., and Harris, P. 1975. Distribution and importance in Northwestern Alberta of toadflax and its insect enemies. Plant Sci. 55:157–162.Google Scholar
7. Debach, P. 1964. The scope of biological control. Pages 3–18 in Debach, P., ed. Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Reinhold Publ. Corp. New York.Google Scholar
8. Englert, W. D. 1974. Revision der Gattung Metzneria Zeller (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) mit Beitgragen zur Biologie der Arten. Z. angew. Entomol. 75:381–421.Google Scholar
9. Frick, K. E. 1970. Longitarsus jacobaeae (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae), a flea beetle for the biological control of tansy ragwort. 1. Host plant specificity studies. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 63:284–296.Google Scholar
10. Frick, K. E. and Andres, L. A. 1967. Host specificity of the ragwort seed fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 60:457–463.Google Scholar
11. Goeden, R. D. 1973. Phytophagous insects found on Salsola in Turkey during exploration for biological weed control agents for California. Entomophaga 18:439–448.Google Scholar
12. Goeden, R. D., Andres, L. A., Freeman, T. E., Harris, P., Pienkowski, R. L. and Walker, C. R. 1974. Present status of projects on the biological control of weeds with insects and plant pathogens in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci. 22:490–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Harley, K. L. S. 1973. Biological control of Lantana in Australia. Proc. Int. Symp. Biol. Control Weeds Pages 23–29. in Misc. Publ. No. 8, Common w. Inst. Biol. Control.Google Scholar
14. Harris, P. 1961. Control of toadflax by Brachypterolus pulicarius (L.) (Coleoptera:Nitidulidae), and Gymnaetron antirrhini (Payk.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Canada. Can. Entomol. 94:744–780.Google Scholar
15. Harris, P. 1963. Host specificity of Calophasia lunula (Hubn.) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae). Can. Entomol. 95:101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Harris, P. 1964. Host specificity of Altica carduorum Guer. (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae). Can. J. Zool. 42:857–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Harris, P. 1967. Suitability of Anaitis plagiata (Geometridae) for biocontrol of Hypericum perforatum in dry grassland of British Columbia. Can. Entomol. 99:1304–1310.Google Scholar
18. Harris, P., Peschken, D. and Milroy, J. 1969. The status of biological control of the weed Hypericum perforatum in British Columbia. Can. Entomol. 101:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Harris, P. and Piper, G. L. 1970. Ragweed (Ambrosia spp.:Compositae):its North American insects and the possibilities for its biological control. Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control. 13:117–140.Google Scholar
20. Harris, P., Wilkinson, A. T. S., Neary, M. E., Thompson, L. S. and Finnamore, D. 1975. Establishment in Canada of the Cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae (Lepidopera:arctiidae) for controlling the weed Senecio jacobaea . Can. Entomol. 107:913–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Harris, P., Thompson, L. S., Wilkinson, A. T. S. and Neary, M. E. 1978. Reproductive biology of tansey ragwort, climate and biological control by the cinnabar moth in Canada. Proc., Lit. Symp. Biol. Control Weeds:163–173.Google Scholar
22. Harris, P., Wilkinson, A. T. S., Thompson, L. S. and Neary, M. 1978. Interaction between the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae L. (Lep.: Arctiidae) and ragwort, Senecio jacobaeae L. Compositae) in Canada. Proc. Int. Symp. Biol. Control Weeds: 174–180.Google Scholar
23. Ivanova, T. S. 1966. Biological control of mountain bluet (Acroptilon picris C.A.M.) (In Russian) Izv. Acad. Nauk, Tadzhik SSR (Otdel. biol. Nauk.) 2:51–63. (Translation-Translation Bureau, Canada Dep. Sec. of State, No. 3793).Google Scholar
24. Johansson, S. 1962. Insects associated with Hypericum L. 1. Host plant and Coleptera. Opusc. Entomol. 27:128–146.Google Scholar
25. Johansson, S. 1962. Insects associated with Hypericum L. 2. Lepidoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera and general remarks. Opusc. Entomol. 27:175–192.Google Scholar
26. Johnston, T. H. and Tyron, H. 1914. Queensland: Report of the prickly pear travelling Commission, 1st Nov. 1912—30 April 1914. Brisbane: Gov. Printer. 131 pp.Google Scholar
27. Karny, M. 1963. The possibilities of Calophasia lunula Hufn. in the biological control of toadflax, Linaria vulgaris Mill. Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control. 3:1–26.Google Scholar
28. Kok, L. T. 1975. Host specificity studies on Ceutorhynchidius horridus (Panzer) (Coleoptera:Curculionidae) for the biocontrol of musk and plumeless thistle. Weed Res. 15:21–25.Google Scholar
29. Lawton, J. H. and Schroeder, D. 1977. Effects of plant type, size of geographical range and taxonomic isolation on the number of insect species associated with British plants. Nature 265:127–140.Google Scholar
30. Malicky, H., Sobhian, R., and Zwölfer, H. 1970. Studies on the possibilities for biological control of Rhamnus catbartica L. in Canada. Host ranges, feeding, sites, and phenology of insects associated with European Rhamnaceae. Z. angew. Entomol. 65:77–97.Google Scholar
31. Maw, M. G. 1976. An annotated list of insects associated with Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Canada. Can. Entomol. 108:235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Maw, M. G. 1976. Biology of the Tortoise beetle, Cassia hemisphaerica (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae), a possible biological control agent for bladder campion, Silene cucubalus, (Caryophyllaceae) in Canada. Can. Entomol. 108:945–954.Google Scholar
33. Mohyuddin, A. E. 1969. Insects from Calystegia spp. and Convolvulus spp. Tech. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control 11:93–104.Google Scholar
34. Myers, J. H. 1976. Distribution and dispersal in populations capable of resource depletion. A simulation model. Oecologia (Berl.) 23:255–269.Google Scholar
35. Myers, J. H. and Campbell, B. J. 1976. Distribution and dispersal in populations capable of resource depletion. A field study on cinnabar moth. Oecologia (Berl.) 24:7–20.Google Scholar
36. Myers, J. H. and Campbell, B. J. 1976. Indirect measures of larvel dispersal in the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Can. Entomol. 108:967–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Neser, S. R., Annecke, D. P. 1973. Biological control of weeds in South Africa. Entomol. Mem. Dep. Agric. Tech. Serv. Repub. S. Afr. No. 28, 27 pp.Google Scholar
38. Peschken, D. P. 1977. Host specificity of Tingis ampliata, (Tingidae:Heteroptera); a candidate for the biological control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Can Entomol. 109:669–674.Google Scholar
39. Peschken, D. P. 1977. Biological control of creeping thistle (Cirsium arvense): Analysis of the releases of Altica carduorum (Col: Chrysomelidae) in Canada. Entomophaga. 22:425–428.Google Scholar
40. Peschken, D. P. and Harris, P. 1975. Host specificity and biology of Urophora cardui (Diptera:Tephritidae). A biocontrol agent for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) . Can. Entomol. 107:1101–1110.Google Scholar
41. Peschken, D., Friesen, H. A., Tonks, N. V., and Banham, F. L. 1970. Releases of Altica carduorum (Chrysomelidae:Coleoptera) against the weed Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Canada. Can. Entomol. 102:264–271.Google Scholar
42. Schröder, D. 1969. Studies on phytophagous insects of Euphorbia spp. Chamaesphecia empiformis (Esp.) Prog. Rep. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, 23, 13 pp.Google Scholar
43. Schröder, D. 1973. The phytophagous insects attacking Sonchus spp. (Compositae) in Europe. Proc. Int. Symp. Biol. Control Weeds. Pages 89–96 in Mis. Publ. No. 8. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control. Google Scholar
44. Simmonds, F. J. 1967. The economics of biological control. J. R. Soc. Arts 115:880–898.Google Scholar
45. Smith, J. M. 1958. Biological control of klamath weed, Hypericum perforatum L., in British Columbia. Proc. Int. Cong. Entomol. 1956. 4:561–565.Google Scholar
46. Watson, A. K. and Renney, A. J. 1974. The biology of Canadian weeds. Centaurea diffusa and C. maculosa . Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:687–701.Google Scholar
47. Wilson, F. 1943. The entomological control of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) Bull. Coun. Sci. Ind. Res. Malb. 169:5–87.Google Scholar
48. Wilson, F. 1960. A review of the biological control of insects and weeds in Australia and Australian New Guinea. Tech. Commun. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control 1, 102 pp.Google Scholar
49. Zwölfer, H. 1965. Preliminary list of phytophagous insects attacking wild cynareae species in Europe. Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control 6:81–154.Google Scholar
50. Zwölfer, H. 1967. The host-range distribution and life-history of Rhinocyllus conicus Froel. Prog. Rep. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, 18, 21 pp.Google Scholar
51. Zwölfer, H. 1970. Investigations on the host specificity of Urophora affinis Frfld. Prog. Rep. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, 25, 28 pp.Google Scholar
52. Zwölfer, H. 1972. Investigations on Urophora stylata Fabr., a possible agent for the biological control of Cirsium vulgare in Canada. Prog. Rep. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control, 29, 20 pp.Google Scholar
53. Zwölfer, H. 1976. Investigations on Sphenoptera (Chilostetha) jugoslavica Obeb. (Col. Bupresitidea), a possible biocontrol agent of the weed Centaurea diffusa Lam. (Compositae) in Canada. Z. angew. Entomol. 80:170–190.Google Scholar
54. Zwölfer, H. and Harris, P. 1966. Ceutorhynchus litura (F.). (Col., Curculionidae) a potential insect for the biological control of thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., in Canada. Can. J. Zool. 44:23–38.Google Scholar
55. Zwölfer, H., and Harris, P. 1971. Host specificity determination of insects for biological control of weeds. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 16:159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar