Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T13:56:18.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Old Tibetan contracts in the Sven Hedin collection1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Tsuguhito Takeuchi
Tsuguhito Takeuchi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University of Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the Tibetan texts in the Sven Hedin Collection now preserved in the Ethnographical Museum (Folkens Museum), Stockholm, there are three documents which are considered to belong to the Old Tibetan period. Their photos were first published in Bailey (1973), together with comments on a few Khotanese-related words, the texts being numbered Hedin 1, 2 and 3. But since then, they have not been paid due attention. In May 1990, I was able to examine these three manuscripts by courtesy of the Folkens Museum and Professor Staffan Rosén, secretary of the Hedin Collection.

On examination, I realized that all three texts are contracts, but of different kinds: that is, Hedin 1 is a sale contract, Hedin 2 a loan contract, and Hedin 3 a contract of hiring. Each exemplifies one of the three major types of Old Tibetan contract. Although different in kind, they show a close resemblance in both form and content: they are written on paper of similar size and quality. The left edge of each document is torn off in a similar way, but my attempts to join them together showed that they were not likely to have formed one piece. Paleographically, the three texts are written in similar styles, though apparently by different hands. They also have in common somenames of the persons concerned (cf. §IV). All these shared features clearly suggest that these three texts, even though they were not originally one, belong to the same period and location.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , October 1994 , pp. 576 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Abbreviations

Bailey, H. W. 1945–1963. Indo-Scythian studies, being Khotanese texts, edited by H. W. Bailey, 4 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (KT)Google Scholar
Bailey, H. W. 1968. Corpus Inscriptiorum Iranicarum. Part II. Vol. v: Saka documents, text volume. London: Percy Lund, Humphries & Co.Google Scholar
Bailey, H. W. 1973. ‘Taklamakan miscellany’, BSOAS, XXXVI, 2: 224–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, C. I. 1987. The Tibetan empire in Central Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eimer, H. 1972–1978. ‘Tibetica Stockholmiensia. Handliste der tibetischen Texte der Sven-Hedin-Stiftung und des Ethnographischen Museums zu Stockholm’, ZAS, VI, 603–81; VII, 301–52; VIII, 179–240; IX, 37–86; x, 625–74; XI, 507–54; XII, 315–58.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1967. Tibetan texts concerning Khotan. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1983. ‘Some more loanwords in Khotanese’, Die Sprache, 29/1: 43–9.Google Scholar
Emmerick, R. E. 1985. Tibetan loanwords in Khotanese and Khotanese loanwords in Tibetan’, Orientalia Iosephi Tucci Memoriae Dedicata, vol. I. Rome: ISMEO, 301–17.Google Scholar
Jäschke, H. A. 1881. A Tibetan-English dictionary. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner. (repr. 1975, Delhi)Google Scholar
KT Bailey, v. (1945–1963).Google Scholar
Kumamoto, H. 1990. ‘A new look at the chronology of the Khotanese documents’. Paper presented at the International Congress for Asian and North African Studies inToronto.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. 1916. ‘Loan-words in Tibetan’, TP, XVII: 403–552.Google Scholar
Moriyasu, T. 1984. ‘Toban no Chūōajia shinshutsu [Tibetan expansion to Central Asia]’, Kanazawa-daigaku Bungakubu-ronshū, 4: 1–85.Google Scholar
Sato, H. 1978. Chibetto Rekishi-chiri Kenkyū [Studies in the Historical Geography of Tibet], Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Schmid, T. 1954. ‘A Tibetan passport from 1714’, in Contributions to ethnography, linguistics and history of religion: reports from the scientific expedition to the north-western provinces of China under the leadership of Dr. Sven Hedin. Vol. VIII. Ethnography 6. Stockholm: Statens Etnogarfiska Museet, 59–68.Google Scholar
Simonsson, N. 1957. Indo-Tibetische Studien, I. Upsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Stein, M. Aurel. 1907. Ancient Khotan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stein, M. Aurel. 1928. Innermost Asia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, T. 1990. ‘Chūō-ajia shutsudo Ko-chibetto-go kachiku baibai-monjo [The Old Tibetan contracts for cattle sales], Studies on the Inner Asian languages, vol. 5 (Kobe), 33–67.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, T. 1992. ‘On the Old Tibetan sale contracts’, S., Ihara and Z., Yamaguchi (ed.), Tibetan studies/Narita 1989 (Narita), 773–92.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, T. (forthcoming). Old Tibetan contracts from Central Asia (in preparation).Google Scholar
Thomas, F. W. and Giles, L. 1948. ‘A Tibeto-Chinese word-and-phrase book’, BSOAS, XII, 3: 753–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, F. W. 1935, 1951. Tibetan literary texts and documents concerning Chinese Turkestan. [4 vols.] vols. I, II. London: Royal Asiatic Society. (TLTD).Google Scholar
TLTD Thomas, v. (1935, 1951).Google Scholar
Tucci, G. 1949. Tibetan painted scrolls, 3 vols. Rome: La Libreria della Stato. (repr. 1980, Kyoto)Google Scholar
Uebach, H. 1985. ‘An 8th century list of Thousand-districts in Ne'u Pandita's History’, in B., Aziz and M., Kapstein (ed.), Soundings in Tibetan civilization. New Delhi: Manohar, 147–51.Google Scholar
Uebach, H. 1987. Nel-pa Paṇḍitas Chronik Me-tog Phren-ba. Munich.Google Scholar
Unkrig, W. A. 1954. ‘Die Tollwut in der Heilkunde des Lamaismus nach Tibetisch = Mongolischen Texten im “Statens Etnografiska Museum” zu Stockholm’, in Contributions to ethno graphy, linguistics and history of religion: reports from the scientific expedition to the north-western provinces of China under the leadership of Dr. Sven Hedin. VIII: Ethnography 6. Stockholm: Statens Etnografiska Museet, 1–20.Google Scholar
Uray, G. 1988. ‘New contributions to Tibetan documents from the post-Tibetan Tun-huang’, in Uebach, H. and Panglung, L. (ed.), TibetanStudies (Munich), 515–28.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. and Rong, X. 1987. ‘Un manuscrit chinois découvert à Cira près de Khotan’, Cahiers d Extrême-Asie, 3 (Kyoto), 77–92.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. and Rong, X. 1988. ‘(On the dating of some Khotanese documents discovered in Khotan and related problems)’, Tōyō Gakuhō vol. 69: 59–86.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. and Rong, X. 1989. ‘ (On the dating of some Khotanese documents discovered in Dunhuang and related problems)’, in Festschrift for Professor Chen Yinke(),(PekingUniversity Press), 284–306.Google Scholar