Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:59:42.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Symbolic powers of prime ideals with applications to hypersurface rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Sam Huckaba*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-3027, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let R be a commutative Noetherian ring and suppose q is a prime ideal of R. A fundamental problem is to decide when powers qn of q are primary (that is qn is its own primary decomposition). If q is generated by a regular sequence then powers of q are always primary, because G(q, R) (the associated graded ring of R with respect to q) is an integral domain (see [12 page 98] and also [5 (2.1)]). Let qn) denote the nth symbolic power of q-defined by q(n) = {rεR|there exists sεR\q such that sr ε qn}. Then qn is primary if and only if qn = q(n) If q is generated by a regular sequence then we call it a complete intersection prime ideal, so if q is a complete intersection prime ideal then qn ≠ q(n) for all n ≥ 1. If q is not a complete intersection then powers need not be primary. If R is a three-dimensional regular local ring and q is a non-complete intersection height two prime ideal for example, then Huneke showed [11 Corollary (2.5)] that qn = q(n) for all n ≥ 2. Thus, for such a prime q it is impossible for qn to occur in the primary decomposition of any ideal. This phenomena increases the difficulty in finding a primary decomposition for an ideal having q as an associated prime.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1989

References

[1] Cowsik, R. C., Symbolic powers and number of defining equations, Algebra and its Applications (Lecture notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics Series, Vol. 91) Decker, Marcel (1984).Google Scholar
[2] Cowsik, R. C. and Nori, , On the fibers of blowing up, J. Indian Math. Soc., 40 (1976), 217222.Google Scholar
[3] Griffith, P., Pathology in divisor class groups of hypersurfaces, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 41 (1986), 3749.Google Scholar
[4] Herrmann, M. and Ikeda, S., Remarks on lifting of Cohen-Macaulay Property, Nagoya Math. J., 92 (1983), 121132.Google Scholar
[5] Hochster, M., Symbolic powers in Noetherian domains, Illinois J. Math., 15 (1971), 927.Google Scholar
[6] Hochster, M., Criteria for equality of ordinary and symbolic powers of primes, Math. Z., 133 (1973), 5365.Google Scholar
[7] Huckaba, S., On linear equivalence of the P-adic and P-symbolic topologies, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 46 (1987), 179185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Huneke, C., Symbolic powers of prime ideals and special graded algebras, Comm. Algebra, 9 (1981), 339366.Google Scholar
[9] Huneke, C., On the associated graded ring of an ideal, Illinois J. Math., 26 (1982), 121137.Google Scholar
[10] Huneke, C., On the finite generation of symbolic blow-ups, Math. Z., 179 (1982), 465472.Google Scholar
[11] Huneke, C., On the primary components of and integral closures of ideals in 3-dimensional regular local rings, Math. Ann., 275 (1986), 617635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Matsumura, H., Commutative Algebra, 2nd Edition, Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, Mass., 1980.Google Scholar
[13] McAdam, S., Asymptotic Prime Divisors, Lecture Notes in Math., No. 1023, Springer-Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar
[14] Northcott, D. G. and Rees, D., Reductions of ideals in local rings, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 50 (1954), 145158.Google Scholar
[15] Ratliff, L. J. Jr., On asymptotic prime divisors, Pacific J. Math., 111 (1984), 395413.Google Scholar
[16] Ratliff, L. J. Jr., The topology determined by the symbolic powers of primary ideals, Comm. Algebra, 13 (1985), 20732104.Google Scholar
[17] Schenzel, P., Symbolic powers of prime ideals and their topology, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 93 (1985), 1520.Google Scholar
[18] Zariski, D. and Samuel, P., Commutative Algebra, vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
[19] Burch, L., On ideals of finite homological dimension in local rings, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 64 (1968), 949952.Google Scholar
[20] Kunz, E., Introduction to Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1985.Google Scholar
[21] Trung, N. V. and Ikeda, S., When is the Rees Algebra Cohen-Macaulay?, preprint.Google Scholar