Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:09:42.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

View from Below

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2022

Peter Ranis*
Affiliation:
York College and Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The majority of the working classes are divided into various factions that display a host of views and attitudes. As E. P. Thompson has portrayed the concept of class, it is at best not a permanent structure or category but something that emerges from time to time when workers band together for one reason or another. The complexity of this phenomenon has been compounded by the growth of various sectors of the working class, adding to its heterogeneity and amorphousness. Marx himself perceived that capitalism had “converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science into its paid wage labourers.”

Type
Research Reports and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

Research for this note was made possible by a Fulbright Senior Research Grant and three PSC/CUNY awards. My appreciation also goes to the Instituto Torcuato Di Telia of Buenos Aires for making its facilities available to me in July and August 1987. I also wish to thank FLACSO graduate student Olga Ventura for her help in compiling the survey data and Professor Anne Rothstein of Lehman College, CUNY, for computer programming assistance. I am grateful to Gil Merkx, Sharon Kellum, and the anonymous LAR readers for their helpful comments.

References

Adorno, Theodore W., Frenkel-Brunswick, Else, Levinson, Daniel J., and Sanford, R. Nevitt 1950 The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Argentina, Republica De 1986 Estructura sindical en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Trabajo, 1986.Google Scholar
ARGENTINA, REPUBLICA DE, INDEC (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTATISTICA Y CENSOS) 1984 Anuario Estadístico, 1981–1982. Buenos Aires: INDEC.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Eduard 1961 Evolutionary Socialism. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Boggs, Carl 1976 Gramsci's Marxism. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Booth, John A., and Seligson, Mitchell A. 1984The Political Culture of Authoritarianism in Mexico: A Reexamination.” LAR 19, no. 1:106–24.Google Scholar
Catterberg, Edgardo 1985Las elecciones del 30 de Octubre de 1983: el surgimiento de una nueva convergencia electoral.” Desarrollo Económico 25, no. 98 (July–Sept.):260–67.Google Scholar
Coleman, Kenneth M., and Davis, Charles L. 1986How Workers Evaluate Their Unions: Exploring Determinants of Union Satisfaction in Venezuela and Mexico.” Paper presented at the meetings of the Latin American Studies Association, Boston, 23–25 October.Google Scholar
Di Tella, Torquato 1965Populism and Reform in Latin America.” In Obstacles to Change in Latin America, edited by Veliz, Claudio. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich, ED. 1966 Marx's Concept of Man. New York: Frederick Ungar.Google Scholar
Garson, Barbara 1974 All the Livelong Day. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Germani, Gino 1962 Política y sociedad en una época de transición: de la sociedad tradicional a la sociedad de masas. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
Godio, Julio 1987La ideología de los cuadros sindicales intermedios.” La Ciudad Futura, no. 5 (June):811.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H., Lockwood, David, Bechhofer, Frank, and Platt, Jennifer 1968 The Affluent Worker: Political Attitudes and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halle, David 1984 America's Working Man: Work, Home, and Politics among Blue-Collar Property Owners. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric 1984 Workers: Worlds of Labor. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
James, Daniel 1988 Resistance and Integration: Peronism and the Argentine Working Class. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lamadrid, Alejandro F. 1987 El nuevo sindicalismo: opiniones y actitudes de su dirigencia media. Buenos Aires: CEPNA.Google Scholar
Lamadrid, Alejandro F. 1988 Política y alineamientos sindicales: opiniones del nuevo cuadro gremial. Buenos Aires: Puntosur.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert 1962 Political Ideology: Why the American Common Man Believes What He Does. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. 1969 What Is to Be Done? New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin 1960 Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Llovet, Juan Jose 1980 Las lustrabotas de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires: CEDES.Google Scholar
Low-Beer, John 1978 Protest and Participation: The New Working Class in Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucita, Eduardo 1985Elecciones sindicales y auto-organización obrera en Argentina.” Cuadernos del Sur, no. 3 (July–Sept.):554.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, Rosa 1970 Reform and Revolution. New York: Pathfinder.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1963 The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers. 1973 Grundrisse. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Frederick 1948 The Communist Manifesto. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Mora Y Araujo, Manuel 1986The Nature of the Alfonsín Coalition.” In Elections and Democratization in Latin America, 1980–1985, edited by Drake, Paul and Silva, Eduardo. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego, 1986.Google Scholar
Nun, Jose 1979Despidos en la industria automotriz argentina.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología 40, no. 1:55106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palomino, Hector 1986El movimiento obrero y sindical en una larga transición.” El Bimestre, no. 26:1220.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro 1985Latin American Class Structures: Their Composition and Change during the Last Decades.” LAR 20, no. 3:739.Google Scholar
Roxborough, Ian 1984 Unions and Politics in Mexico: The Case of the Auto Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrank, Robert 1978 Ten Thousand Working Days. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schvarzer, Jorge 1983 Martinez de Hoz: la lógica política de la política económica. Buenos Aires: Centro de Investigaciones Sociales sobre el Estado y la Administración (CISEA).Google Scholar
Senen Gonzalez, Santiago 1984 Diez años de sindicalismo argentino: de Perón al Proceso. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Corregidor.Google Scholar
Torre, Juan Carlos 1983 Los sindicatos en el gobierno, 1973–1976. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.Google Scholar
Terkel, Studs 1974 Working. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1968 The Making of the English Working Class. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ruth 1984The Limitations of Ideology in the Early Argentine Labour Movements: Anarchism in the Trade Unions, 1890–1920.” Journal of Latin American Studies 16, pt. 1 (May):8199.Google Scholar
Tiano, Susan 1986Authoritarianism and Political Culture in Argentina and Chile in the Mid-1960s.” LAR 21, no. 1:7398Google Scholar
Torre, Juan Carlos 1983 Los sindicatos en el gobierno, 1973–1976. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C. 1978 The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Villareal, Juan 1985Los hilos sociales de poder.” In Crisis de la dictadura argentina, edited by Jozami, Eduardo, Paz, Pedro, and VilLAReal, Juan, 245–81. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
Winn, Peter 1979Oral History and the Factory Study: New Approaches to Labor History.” LAR 14, no. 2:130–40.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C. 1986 Weavers of the Revolution: The Yarur Workers and Chile's Road to Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
WORLD BANK 1988 Argentina: Social Sectors in Crisis. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Maurice 1967 Revolutionary Politics and the Cuban Working Class. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar