Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:58:59.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Borja Herce, The typological diversity of morphomes: A cross-linguistic study of unnatural morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. Pp. x + 303.

Review products

Borja Herce, The typological diversity of morphomes: A cross-linguistic study of unnatural morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. Pp. x + 303.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2024

YANG QIN Open the ORCID record for YANG QIN [Opens in a new window]
YANG QIN*
Affiliation:
Department of English, School of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, P.R. China znuvqinyang@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , April 2024 , pp. 469 - 473
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2010. Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Bril, Isabelle (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 51–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Hodges, Adam & Rood, David S. (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2016. Thoughts on diagnosing morphomicity: A case study from Ulwa. In Luís, Ana R. & Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (eds.), The morphome debate, 89–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2018. The Romance verb: Morphomic structure and diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trommer, Jochen. 2016. A postsyntactic morphome cookbook. In Siddiqi, Daniel & Harley, Heidi (eds.), Morphological metatheory, 59–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar