Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T03:27:26.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Temperature, and some other Physical Conditions, on Calf Vaccine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Alan B. Green
Affiliation:
Bacteriologist-in-charge, Calf Vaccine Department, Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Temperature influences the rate at which glycerinated lymph deteriorates in accordance with the law of Arrhenius, expressing the effect of temperature upon chemical action; the rate of deterioration increasing three times per 10° rise in temperature.

2. Dry powdered calf vaccine in sealed glass capillary tubes still gave rise to typical vesicles after exposure to a temperature of 100°C. for from 5 to 10 minutes.

3. The vaccine virus can withstand positive osmosis for 24 hours or more, and negative osmosis for 8 weeks or more, at room temperature.

4. It appears doubtful whether the vaccine virus will pass through a Berkefeld V filter even when a stored vaccine emulsion is used for filtration. If any virus does pass through it only does so exceptionally and in small quantities.

5. When a glycerinated vaccine emulsion is filtered, white flocculi frequently form in the filtrate. These are at first minute, but subsequently adhere and form a macroscopic sediment. This sediment, when inoculated on calves, does not cause vesiculation.

Microscopically these flocculi, in hanging drop preparations, resemble the vaccine bodies described by one or more observers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1908

References

Blaxall, (1902). Report of the Medical Officer of the Local Government Board for 1900–1901.Google Scholar
Ballah, (1906). Notes upon experiments with Vaccine Lymph, Brit. Med. Journ., 1906, vol. II.Google Scholar
Blaxall, and Fremlin, (1906). Preliminary Report to the Local Government Board on the results of sustained subjection of glycerinated calf lymph to temperatures below freezing point (Government paper).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carini, (1906). Vergleichende Untersuchungen über den Einfluss hoher Temperaturen auf die Virulenz trockener und glycerinierter Kuhpockenlymphe. Centralbl. f. Bakt. etc. I. Abt. vol. XLI., Originale, p. 32.Google Scholar
Chick, Harriette (1908). An Investigation of the Laws of Disinfection. Journ. of. Hygiene, vol. VIII., p. 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfadyen, and Rowland, (1900). Influence of the temperature of liquid hydrogen on bacteria. Proc. Roy. Soc., vol. LXVI., p. 488.Google Scholar
Madsen, and Nyman, (1907). Zur Theorie der Desinfection. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, vol. XLVII., p. 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novy, and Knapp, (1906). Journ. of. Infectious Diseases, vol. III., p. 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remlinger, and Nouri, (1905). Le virus vaccinal traverse la bougie Berkefeld V. C. R. de la Soc. de Biol., 1905, vol. I., p. 895.Google Scholar
Remlinger, and Nouri, (1905). Sur le passage du virus vaccinal à travers la bougie Berkefeld V. C. R. de la Soc. de Biol., vol. I., p. 986.Google Scholar
Siegel, (1905). Ueber die Aetiologie der Pocken, etc. Berlin, 1905.Google Scholar